Full Text
LPA 810/2015
BRIJ PAL & ORS Representedby:
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY &ANR Respondents Represented by: Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
MATHURA PRASAD & ANR Represented by:
RAJESH CHAUHAN & ANR Represented by:
Respondents Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA.
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR Respondents
Represented by: Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA.
HUKAM SINGH & ANR Appellants
2015:DHC:11327-DB Representedby:
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY &ANR Respondents Represented by: Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
Appellant Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
BRAHMANAND & ORS Representedby:
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
PARTAP SINGH & ANR Representedby:
SUSHIL KUMAR & ANR Represented by:
Kumar, Advocate for DDA.
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR Respondents
Page 2 of9 2015:DHC:11327-DB Represented by:
SHYAM SINGH & ANR Represented by:
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY &ANR Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, LPA 818/2015
MANUAL DAS & ORS Represented by:
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY &ANR Respondents Represented by: Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr^anjay
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
KESHAV CHAUHAN & ORS Represented by:
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
RAKESH KUMAR &ANR Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev
Page 3 of9 2015:DHC:11327-DB
Represented by: Mr.Amn Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA.
VED PRAKASH & ANR Represented by:
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
BALJEET SINGH &ANR 4!"'^ Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mi*.Ateev
Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
PRTIAM SINGH &ANR Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev
Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
Page 4 of9 2015:DHC:11327-DB Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, StandingCounseland Mr.Hem
Kumar, Advocate for DDA.
BABU SINGH &ANR Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev
Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
DALBIR SINGH &ANR Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev
Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
Singh, Advocates for DDA.
SUKHPAL SINGH & ANR Appellants Represented by: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev
Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel and Mr.Hem
Kumar, Advocate for DDA.
2015:DHC:11327-DB ANIL KUMAR & ANR Represented by:
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR Respondents
Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, LPA 828/2015
RAJ PAL SINGH & ANR Represented by:
Appellants Mr.Sumit Bansal, Mr.Ateev Mathur and Ms.Jagriti, Advocates.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY &ANR Respondents Represented by: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel andMr.Hem
Kumar, Advocate for DDA.
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
17.11.2015 CMNo.26871/2015 in LPA No.810/2015
CMNo.26874/2015 in LPA No.811/2015 CMNo.26877/2015 in LPA No.812/2015
CMNo.26881/2015 inLPANo.813/2015 CMNo.26884/2015 in LPA No.814/2015
CMNo.26889/2015 inLPANo.815/2015 CMNo.26892/2015 in LPANo.816/2015
2015:DHC:11327-DB CM No.26897/2015 inLPA No.817/2015 r,MNo.26Q03/2015 in T.PANo.818/2015 rMNo.2^Q0^/2015 in LPA No.819/2015 r.1VTNo.2(^Q11/2015 in LPANo.820/2015
CM No.26Q16/2015 in LPANo.821/2015 CMNO.26Q26/2015 in LPANo.822/2015
CM N0.26Q31/2015 in LPANo.823/2015 CMNO.26Q36/2015 in LPANo.824/2015 rMNo.26Q41/2015 in LPANo.825/2015 r.MNo.26946/2015 inLPA No.826/2015 rMNo.26Q49/2015 inLPANo.827/2015
CMNo.26954/2015 in LPANo.828/2015 For the reasons stated in the applications delay in filing the appeals is condoned.
Applications are allowed.
T.PA No.810/2015. LPA No.811/2015 , No,R13/2015. LPA_mM4Z2Q15amAM5^^
No.818/2015 T.PA No.826/2015 TPA No.824/2015. LPA No.825/2015
Nn.827/2015 TPA No.828/2015
ORDER
1. Having heard learned counsel for the appellant we do not find any case made out to interfere with the impugned decision dated May 19, 2015 for the reason while upholding the order passed in appeal by the District Judge, which in turn upheld the eviction order passed by the Estate Officer, the learned Single Judge has dealt with all the contentions advanced.
2. Same contentions are being advanced before us.
3. Though this is the first Intra-Court Appeal, but as amatter offact is a second appeal. The first appeal against the impugned order was under the Public Premises (Eviction ofUnauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 before the LPA 810/2015 & conn.matters Page 7 of[9] 2015:DHC:11327-DB District Judge. The order passed in appeal was challenged before the learned Single Judge. The Intra-Court Appeal is thus the third tier before ajudicial fora.
4. The undisputed position is that the lease in favour of the Delhi Peasants Co-Operative Multipurpose Society, granted by the erstwhile Delhi Improvement Trust, has expired. Delhi Development Authority is the successor-in-interest. The lease has not been renewed.
5. Resolution No.6 passed by a committee of officers of the Delhi Development Authority on which the appellants rely has been noted and considered by the District Judge as also the learned Single Judge. Correct view has been taken. Unless a resolution is formally notified and communicated to aparty, no rights are created thereunder. Besides, the learned Single Judge has rightly observed that the resolution only seeks to put in place an interim arrangement.
6. The contention that the land cannot be used for aBio-diversity Park is neither here nor there for the reason the land in question is part ofeither the bank or flood plain of river Yamuna. There are numerous authorities concerning environmental issues requiring the land to be maintained either as it is or used as aBio-diversity Park i.e. have aplantation ofakind where river Yamuna is rejuvenated.
7. The appeals are dismissed inlimine.
8. No costs. rMNn.2687Q/2015 & CMNo.26872/2015 in TTANo.810/2015 r.MNn.26873/2015 & CM No.26875/2015 inLPANo.811/2015 r.MNn.26876/2015 & CMNo.26878/2015 in LPANo.812/2015 r.MNo.2688Q/2015 & CMNo.26882/2015 in TPA No.813/2015 rMNn.26883/2015 & CMNo.26885/2015 inTTANo.814/2015 LPA 810/2015 &conmrnatters ^ 2015:DHC:11327-DB CM No 2688S/2015 &CM No.26890/201 Sin TPA No.815/2015 TM Nn.26891/?ni S&CMNo.?^«QV2015 in L?A No.816/2015 rMNo.26SQ6/2015 &CMNo.26898/2015 in LPA No.817/2015 rMNo.26902/2015 &CMNo.26904/2015 inLPANo.818/2015 CM No'.2690^/2015 &CM No.26907/201 Sin T PA No.819/2015 CM No.2<S910/2015fc CMNo.26912/2015 in LPA No.820/2015 CMNo.26915/2015 &CMNo.26917/2015 in LPA No.821/2015 CMNo.26925/2015 &CMNo.26927/2015 in LPA No.822/2015 CM No 26930/2015 &CMNo.26932/2015 in LPA No.823/2015 CM No'.26935/901 ^&CM No 9^^7/2015 in T PA No.824/2015 CM No 26940/2015 &CM No.26942/2015 in LPANo.825/2015 CM No.26945/901 -S &CM No 26947/2015 in TPA No.826/2015 CMNO.2694R/2015& CM No.26950/2015 inLPANo.827/2015 CMNo.26951/2015 &CM No.26955/2015in LPANo.828/2015. Dismissed as infructuous. ^ ^ PRADEEP NANBRMOG, J. - MUKTA GUPTA, J. NOVEMBER 17,2015 skb LPA 810/2015 &conn.matters ^