Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
S.C. Chugh v. N.T.P.C. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Power to consider the petitioner’s claim for counting ad-hoc and temporary service towards pension benefits under the 1986 Office Memorandum and pass a reasoned order.
Pranav Gandharv Chaudhary & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an independent inquiry into allegations of fake certificates and procedural irregularities in university faculty selection, without quashing the appointments outright.
Ravinder Kumar Jain v. The Director of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee who worked during the re-employment period is entitled to salary despite delayed approval by the Directorate of Education and directed payment accordingly.
S.B. Jain v. Indian Co-Chairperson (Secretary of Govt. of India and Anr.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a contractual employee appointed after 60 years, ruling that contract extension requires mutual consent and such employees are not covered by regular employment Byelaws.
Neeraj Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a Constable from ITBP service for desertion, affirming the authority of the Commandant and the rejection of a belated appeal.
PNB Finance and Industries Limited v. Late Shri Shital Prasad Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and decreed recovery of loan amounts with agreed 16% interest per annum based on promissory notes, setting aside the trial court's dismissal.
Unique Engineers Pvt. Ltd. v. Nitya Electrocontrols Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the admission of a winding up petition where delayed debit notes failed to establish a genuine dispute over outstanding payments, emphasizing timely claims and payment obligations under the Companies Act and Sale of Goods Act.
Raj Rani Garg v. Lt Governor, NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid and possession not taken, thereby restoring the petitioner's rights over the land.
Rajat Gupta v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of misbehavior under multiple IPC sections, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and protection of the complainant.
Brij Mohan & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction under Section 302/34 IPC, rejecting the applicability of Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC due to disproportionate and cruel attack causing fatal injuries.
Bal Kishan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid, granting relief to petitioners for land where these conditions were unmet.
Vijay Mohan v. Lt. Governor, NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse if physical possession and compensation are not effected, and quashed acquisition notifications accordingly.
M/S ABHIPRA CAPITAL LTD. v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION)
The Delhi High Court held that the one-time payment for acquiring stock exchange membership is capital expenditure as it creates an intangible asset of enduring benefit.
Cellular Operators Association of India v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that unutilized credit of abolished Education Cess and Secondary and Higher Education Cess cannot be utilized against excise duty or service tax, dismissing the petitioners' claim of vested rights based on budgetary statements and legislative amendments.
S P Babbar v. Romi Maggo & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the leave petition challenging dismissal of a complaint case for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to pay court-imposed costs.
Khadija Rafique v. Mohd. Naseem & Ors.
The Delhi High Court clarified that a money decree for damages against multiple defendants is joint and several, preventing multiple recoveries of the same amount from each defendant.
Naresh Kumar v. Nitin Luthra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that a defence claiming repayment of a cheque loan in cash without proof is frivolous and does not entitle leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.
Inderjeet v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, holding that prosecution failed to prove his connection with the premises where illegal abstraction occurred.
National Investor Forum Regd v. Golden Forests India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Committee’s rejection of investor claims lacking original receipts submitted by the cut-off date and dismissed the petition challenging the order.
Jaiveer Singh @ Jagira v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted three accused of murder due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and untrustworthy recoveries, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence for conviction.