Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sonvir @ Somvir v. State of NCT of Delhi

02 Jul 2018 · Ashok Bhushan; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that police can lawfully take fingerprints under Section 4 of the Identification of Prisoners Act without Magistrate's order, but acquitted the appellant due to insufficient circumstantial evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 Section 4 Section 5 fingerprint evidence

Sonvir @ Somvir v. State of NCT of Delhi

02 Jul 2018 · Ashok Bhushan; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that fingerprints taken by police under Section 4 of the Identification of Prisoners Act without Magistrate's order are admissible, but acquitted the appellant due to insufficient circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920 Section 4 Section 5 fingerprint evidence

Kishan Rao v. Shankargouda

02 Jul 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 561

The Supreme Court restored conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the High Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and wrongly setting aside the conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 presumption Revisional jurisdiction Section 397 CrPC

Kishan Rao v. Shankargouda

02 Jul 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court restored conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that the High Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by reappreciating evidence and wrongly setting aside the conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 139 presumption Revisional jurisdiction Criminal appeal

COMMON CAUSE v. UNION OF INDIA

02 Jul 2018 · ARUN MISHRA; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR · 2018 INSC 568

The Supreme Court upheld the appointments of the Central Vigilance Commissioner and Vigilance Commissioner, holding that the selection process complied with statutory and judicial standards of integrity and transparency, and dismissed petitions challenging their appointments.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Central Vigilance Commission Central Vigilance Commissioner Vigilance Commissioner appointment

COMMON CAUSE v. UNION OF INDIA

02 Jul 2018 · ARUN MISHRA; MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

The Supreme Court upheld the appointments of Mr. K.V. Chowdary as CVC and Mr. T.M. Bhasin as VC, holding that the selection process was lawful, transparent, and the allegations against them unsubstantiated.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Central Vigilance Commission Central Vigilance Commissioner Vigilance Commissioner impeccable integrity

Devidas Loka Rathod v. State of Maharashtra

02 Jul 2018 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Navin Sinha · 2018 INSC 560

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant on the ground of unsoundness of mind, holding that reasonable doubt about mental state at the time of offence entitles acquittal under Section 84 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unsoundness of mind insanity defence Section 84 IPC mens rea

Devidas Loka Rathod v. State of Maharashtra

02 Jul 2018 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant on the ground of unsoundness of mind, holding that the defence was established on a preponderance of probability and the prosecution failed to disprove it beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unsoundness of mind Section 84 IPC mens rea burden of proof

Union of India v. Ram Lakhan Sharma

02 Jul 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 558

The Supreme Court held that departmental inquiries are vitiated if the Inquiry Officer acts as both prosecutor and adjudicator, violating natural justice, and upheld reinstatement orders while allowing fresh inquiries.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry presenting officer principles of natural justice inquiry officer

Union of India v. Ram Lakhan Sharma

02 Jul 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the setting aside of CRPF dismissal orders due to Inquiry Officers acting as prosecutors, violating natural justice, and allowed fresh inquiries ensuring impartial adjudication.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry natural justice Presenting Officer Inquiry Officer

Shyam Narayan Prasad v. Krishna Prasad

02 Jul 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld that property allotted in partition retains ancestral character for male descendants, invalidated an unregistered exchange deed of immovable property, and denied protection under Section 53A without pleading possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant ancestral property coparcenary partition exchange deed

Shyam Narayan Prasad v. Krishna Prasad

02 Jul 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld that an unregistered exchange deed involving ancestral immovable property is invalid and inadmissible, affirming the coparcenary rights of male descendants and denying protection under Section 53A without pleaded possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant ancestral property coparcenary property partition exchange deed

The State of Punjab v. Soma Devi

02 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court set aside the impugned High Court orders and remitted the matters for fresh consideration along with similar cases previously remitted to ensure consistent adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed remand common order High Court impugned orders

The State of Punjab & Ors. v. Soma Devi through Lrs.

02 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court set aside the impugned High Court orders and remitted the matters for fresh consideration along with previously remitted cases, directing fresh notice to respondents.

civil appeal_allowed remand High Court impugned orders common order

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Jul 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 565

The Supreme Court upheld that Noida and Greater Noida are not local authorities under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, their interest income is exempt under a specific notification, and TDS is mandatorily deductible on annual lease rent payments under Section 194I.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10(20) Section 194I Section 194A(3)(iii)(f)

New Okhla Industrial Development Authority v. Union of India

02 Jul 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld that Noida and Greater Noida are not local authorities under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, but lessees must deduct tax at source on annual lease rent payments under Section 194-I, while interest income of these authorities is exempt under Section 194A(3)(iii)(f).

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 10(20) Section 194-I Section 194A(3)(iii)(f)

Director General, CRPF v. Janardan Singh

02 Jul 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that CRPF personnel posted in the North Eastern Region are entitled to Special (Duty) Allowance for the entire period of posting regardless of headquarters location, affirming the allowance's retrospective application and upholding the right to equality under Article 14.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Special Duty Allowance North Eastern Region Central Administrative Tribunal Article 14

Director General, CRPF v. Janardan Singh

02 Jul 2018 · Adarsh Kumar Goel; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld entitlement to Special (Duty) Allowance for CRPF personnel posted in the North Eastern Region for the entire period of posting, ruling that denial based on headquarters location violates Article 14.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Special Duty Allowance North Eastern Region Article 14 reasonable classification

The State of Haryana & Anr. v. Saroj & Ors.

02 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2018 INSC 567

The Supreme Court set aside the impugned judgment on land value fixation and remitted the matters to the High Court for joint consideration with connected cases.

civil appeal_allowed land value fixation remand connected matters condonation of delay

The State of Haryana & Anr. v. Saroj & Ors.

02 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's fixation of land value and remitted the connected matters for joint reconsideration.

civil appeal_allowed land value fixation remand connected matters High Court