Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

HETCHIN HAOKIP v. STATE OF MANIPUR AND ORS

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that a five-day unexplained delay in reporting a preventive detention order to the State Government violates the statutory requirement of 'forthwith' under Section 3(4) of the National Security Act, 1980, and vitiates the detention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention National Security Act, 1980 Section 3(4) forthwith

Hetchin Haokip v. State of Manipur and Ors.

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that under Section 3(4) of the National Security Act, 1980, the detaining authority must report the detention to the State Government 'forthwith'—within reasonable time and without undue delay—and failure to do so without justification vitiates the detention order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant preventive detention National Security Act, 1980 Section 3(4) forthwith

Currency Note Press & Anr v. N.N. Sardesai & Ors.

20 Jul 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 625

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against the High Court's order granting overtime wages to employees, declining to interfere given the factual circumstances and payment already made.

labor appeal_dismissed overtime wages Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Labour Court writ petition

Currency Note Press & Anr v. N.N. Sardesai & Ors

20 Jul 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the High Court's grant of overtime wages to employees who had performed overtime work, declining to interfere given the factual circumstances.

labor appeal_dismissed overtime wages Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Labour Court writ petition

Nayan Prasad v. State of Bihar

20 Jul 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to discharge accused and quashing of complaint, directing the Magistrate to decide the criminal complaint on merits within six months.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 245 CrPC Section 482 CrPC territorial jurisdiction quashing of complaint

Nayan Prasad v. State of Bihar

20 Jul 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to quash a criminal complaint and discharge accused, directing trial on merits and emphasizing limited scope of quashing under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 482 CrPC Section 245 CrPC quashing of complaint territorial jurisdiction

Col. IVS Gahlot v. Union of India

20 Jul 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the denial of promotion marks to an Armed Forces Medical Services officer for a Ph.D. degree not recognized by the Medical Council of India and validly amended promotion policy criteria.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant promotion policy Armed Forces Medical Services Ph.D. degree recognition Medical Council of India Act, 1956

University of Kerala & Anr v. Saiful Islam A. & Ors

19 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that experience for appointment as Reader must be post-Ph.D. but granted equitable relief on service and pension benefits to incumbents who retired during litigation.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Ph.D. qualification experience requirement appointment as Reader service benefits

Sarup Singh v. State of Haryana

18 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court disposed of multiple civil appeals by referring to a prior judgment in connected matters, after condoning delay and granting leave to appeal.

civil other Procedural civil appeal Special Leave Petition delay condoned leave granted

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. T. Natarajan

17 Jul 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that an arbitral award upholding termination but granting liberty to seek reconsideration does not reinstate a dealership, and administrative decisions on restoration are not subject to writ court interference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant dealership agreement arbitral award termination of dealership administrative discretion

The State of Gujarat v. Navinbhai Chandrakant Joshi

17 Jul 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court restored convictions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, holding that demand and acceptance of bribe were proved by credible evidence and recovery of marked currency, and that the High Court erred in acquitting the accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 offence Section 13(1)(d) offence demand and acceptance of bribe

Kalpana Majumder & Ors v. Lakshmi Priya Shaw & Ors

17 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court allowed a civil appeal by enforcing a mediated settlement, quashing related criminal cases, directing property transfer registration with historical stamp duty, and cancelling prior conflicting deeds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement mediation quashing criminal cases property transfer

Kalpana Majumder & Ors v. Lakshmi Priya Shaw & Ors

17 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court allowed a civil appeal by enforcing a mediated settlement, quashing related criminal cases, directing property transfer registration, and cancelling a prior deed to end prolonged litigation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mediation settlement quashing of criminal cases property transfer

Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India

17 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court condemned lynching and mob violence, held vigilantes have no authority to punish, and issued binding guidelines directing States to prevent, investigate, and prosecute such crimes to uphold the rule of law and protect fundamental rights.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant lynching mob violence vigilantism rule of law

Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union of India

17 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed Central and State Governments to take comprehensive preventive, remedial, and punitive measures to curb lynching and mob violence, emphasizing that no citizen or group can take law into their own hands and that the State has a constitutional duty to uphold the rule of law.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant lynching mob violence vigilantism cow protection

Udita Nabha v. Ranjeet Nabha

16 Jul 2018 · N. V. Ramana; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court allowed the wife to withdraw Rs. 2 crores from the deposited permanent alimony as interim relief during the pendency of matrimonial appeals, balancing interests of both parties.

family appeal_allowed Significant permanent alimony interim maintenance Special Marriage Act, 1954 matrimonial dispute

National Highways Authority of India v. Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited

13 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that a party cannot exercise right of first refusal to match the lowest bid without participating in the tender process as mandated by the tender documents, quashing the Arbitral Tribunal and High Court orders allowing such exercise.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right of First Refusal Tender Process Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 Application

National Highways Authority of India v. Gwalior Jhansi Expressway Limited

13 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that a party cannot exercise Right of First Refusal to match the lowest bid without participating in the tender process as mandated by the tender documents, quashing the Arbitral Tribunal and High Court orders allowing such exercise without participation.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Right of First Refusal Tender process Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 application

M. Aamira Fathima v. Annamalai University

13 Jul 2018 · Arun Mishra; Uday Umesh Lalit · 2018 INSC 611

The Supreme Court held that Annamalai University must have its medical course fees fixed by the statutory Fee Fixation Committee under the Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions Act, 1992, and cannot independently fix fees exceeding those prescribed.

education appeal_allowed Significant Fee Fixation Committee Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions Act 1992 Annamalai University Act 2013 tuition fees

M. Aamira Fathima v. Annamalai University

13 Jul 2018 · Arun Mishra; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that Annamalai University must have its medical course fees fixed by the statutory Fee Fixation Committee under the Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions Act, 1992, and cannot fix fees independently.

education appeal_allowed Significant Fee Fixation Committee Tamil Nadu Educational Institutions Act 1992 Annamalai University Act 2013 Medical course fees