Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India & Anr.

23 Jul 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 635

The Supreme Court held that repeated prohibitory orders under Section 144 Cr.P.C. imposing a continuous ban on peaceful assembly in Central Delhi are illegal, affirming the constitutional right to peaceful protest subject to reasonable restrictions in emergent situations.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Section 144 Cr.P.C. Right to peaceful assembly Article 19(1)(b) Reasonable restrictions

Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India & Anr.

23 Jul 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that repeated blanket bans on peaceful assemblies under Section 144 Cr.P.C. in Central Delhi violate the fundamental right to peaceful assembly under Article 19(1)(b) and must be limited to genuine emergencies with due procedural safeguards.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Section 144 Cr.P.C. Right to peaceful assembly Article 19(1)(b) Fundamental rights

Shyam Sunder Agarwal v. P. Narotham Rao

23 Jul 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that Clause 12 of the MoU is not an arbitration agreement but an escrow arrangement, dismissing the appellant's appeal to invoke arbitration.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement escrow agents Memorandum of Understanding Section 11 petition

SH. MARWADI RAJASTHAN EDUCATION SOCIETY, LATUR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR

23 Jul 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; SANJAY KISHAN KAUL · 2018 INSC 636

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant to withdraw 50% of the compensation amount deposited in land acquisition proceedings without security, subjecting the balance to security conditions.

civil appeal_allowed land acquisition compensation withdrawal of deposited amount Reference Court

Sh. Marwadi Rajasthan Education Society v. The State of Maharashtra

23 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court permitted the appellant to withdraw 50% of the land acquisition compensation deposited without security and the balance upon furnishing security, disposing of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed land acquisition compensation withdrawal of deposit Reference Court

Mohammed Zakir v. Shabana & Ors.

23 Jul 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that Section 362 Cr.P.C. cannot be used by a High Court to recall or correct an order on merits and set aside the recall order, directing the lower court to dispose of the pending criminal appeal expeditiously.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 362 Cr.P.C. clerical error recall of order correction of order

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation

23 Jul 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 not inconsistent with the Electricity Act, 2003 continue to apply for tariff determination, affirming the Appellate Tribunal's order and upholding the partial exemption of the Corporation under the 2003 Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Damodar Valley Corporation Electricity Act 2003 Damodar Valley Corporation Act 1948 Tariff determination

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation

23 Jul 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 not inconsistent with the Electricity Act, 2003 continue to apply for tariff determination, and the Tariff Regulations cannot override such statutory provisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Damodar Valley Corporation Electricity Act 2003 Tariff determination Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation

23 Jul 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi

The Supreme Court held that certain provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 continue to apply in tariff determination under the Electricity Act, 2003, affirming partial exemption of DVC and upholding the Appellate Tribunal’s tariff order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Damodar Valley Corporation Electricity Act 2003 Tariff determination fourth proviso to Section 14

Shalu Ojha v. Prashant Ojha

23 Jul 2018 · A. K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that disputes over maintenance under the DV Act requiring detailed evidence should be adjudicated under the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act or Section 125 CrPC, maintaining the interim maintenance at Rs. 50,000 per month pending such proceedings.

family petition_dismissed Significant maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12 DV Act Section 125 CrPC

Shalu Ojha v. Prashant Ojha

23 Jul 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court held that maintenance disputes under the DV Act require detailed evidence and cross-examination under other statutes, directing continuation of interim maintenance at Rs. 50,000 per month pending such proceedings.

family petition_dismissed Significant maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 125 CrPC Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956

Bhaskar Shrachi Alloys Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation

23 Jul 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that provisions of the Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 not inconsistent with the Electricity Act, 2003 continue to apply for tariff determination of DVC, and the Tariff Regulations cannot override such statutory provisions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Damodar Valley Corporation Electricity Act 2003 Damodar Valley Corporation Act 1948 Tariff determination

State of Assam v. Union of India and Ors

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court allowed the State of Assam to produce additional topographical maps during witness examination despite earlier orders, emphasizing the Court's discretion to permit document production in the interest of justice.

civil appeal_allowed production of documents Order VII Rule 14 CPC topographical maps examination of witness

State of Assam v. Union of India and Ors

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court allowed the State of Assam to produce additional topographical maps during evidence despite earlier orders, emphasizing procedural flexibility in the interest of justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant production of documents topographical maps Order XI Rule 13 CPC Order VII Rule 14 CPC

Kanika Goel v. State of Delhi

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court’s order directing the return of a minor child to the USA in an international custody dispute, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child over foreign custody orders and balancing parental rights.

family appeal_dismissed Significant habeas corpus child custody international custody dispute best interest of child

Kanika Goel v. State of Delhi

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court’s order directing the return of a minor child to the USA in an international custody dispute, emphasizing the paramount welfare of the child over foreign court orders and recognizing lawful custody with the biological mother except in exceptional cases.

family appeal_dismissed Significant habeas corpus child custody international jurisdiction best interest of child

INDIAN BANK & ANR v. K PAPPIREDDIYAR & ANR

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud · 2018 INSC 626

The Supreme Court held that whether land is agricultural for the SARFAESI Act's applicability is a question of fact based on use and nature, not mere revenue classification, and remitted the case for fresh determination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act agricultural land security interest Section 31(i)

INDIAN BANK & ANR v. K PAPPIREDDIYAR & ANR

20 Jul 2018 · DIPAK MISRA; A M KHANWILKAR; Dr D Y CHANDRACHUD
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that applicability of the SARFAESI Act to agricultural land depends on factual determination of the land's nature and use, not merely its revenue classification, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act agricultural land security interest Section 31(i)

Nutan Rani and Anr. v. Gurmail Singh and Ors.

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud · 2018 INSC 621

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by including future prospects and fixed interest at 9%, affirming principles from Pranay Sethi.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 compensation future prospects

Nutan Rani and Anr. v. Gurmail Singh and Ors.

20 Jul 2018 · Dipak Misra; A M Khanwilkar; Dr D Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying future prospects addition and fixed interest at 9%, allowing the appeal against the High Court's reduced award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Accident Claims Compensation Future Prospects Personal Expenses Deduction