Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Manphool Singh & Ors v. State of Haryana

16 Aug 2018 · R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court modified murder convictions to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC, recognizing the accused acted in self-defence but exceeded its limits, and dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal of other accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant self-defence Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part II IPC unlawful assembly

Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab

16 Aug 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Navin Sinha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in NDPS cases carrying a reverse burden of proof, the informant and investigating officer must be different persons to ensure a fair investigation, and set aside the conviction due to procedural irregularities and unfair investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act fair investigation informant as investigating officer reverse burden of proof

Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab

16 Aug 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Navin Sinha
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that in NDPS cases carrying a reverse burden of proof, the informant and investigating officer must be different persons to ensure a fair investigation and trial, setting aside conviction due to procedural irregularities and unfair investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act fair investigation reverse burden of proof informant as investigating officer

State of Kerala v. A.A. Ali

14 Aug 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's deletion of the bank guarantee condition and directed release of the vehicle under Section 451 Cr.P.C. without onerous security.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 451 Cr.P.C. release of vehicle bank guarantee security for alleged loss

Lalli Patel v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others

14 Aug 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2018 INSC 706

The Supreme Court held that a treasury deposit made in the name of the Specified Officer satisfies the security deposit requirement under election rules, allowing the election petition to proceed.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant election petition security deposit Rule 7 Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Rules

Lalli Patel v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Others

14 Aug 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that a treasury deposit made in the name of the Specified Officer satisfies the security deposit requirement under election rules, allowing the election petition to proceed.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant security deposit election petition Madhya Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rule 7

Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab

14 Aug 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Navin Sinha · 2018 INSC 705

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under Section 18 NDPS Act due to lack of proof of production of seized contraband before the Magistrate and held that non-compliance of Section 50 is not fatal when contraband is recovered from a bag on a vehicle.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 18 NDPS Section 50 NDPS production of contraband

Mohinder Singh v. State of Punjab

14 Aug 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; R. Banumathi; Navin Sinha
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the conviction under the NDPS Act due to lack of documentary proof of production of seized contraband before the Magistrate, emphasizing the necessity of such production to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 18 NDPS Section 50 NDPS production of contraband

Ram Chandra Singh v. Rajaram

14 Aug 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an insurer is not absolved from liability merely because the driver had a fake licence unless the vehicle owner knowingly permitted the driver to drive with such licence, and remanded the case for fresh consideration on this limited issue.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurer liability fake driving licence vehicle owner duty

Swadeshi Commercial Co. Ltd. and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors

14 Aug 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court disposed of a civil appeal concerning possession and dues based on the respondents' undertaking to surrender possession and clear dues, leaving legal questions open.

civil other vacant possession use and occupation charges undertaking disposal of appeal

Union Bank of India v. C.G. Ajay Babu

14 Aug 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that gratuity forfeiture under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, is not automatic on dismissal and requires either financial loss or a criminal conviction for an offence involving moral turpitude, upholding the employee's entitlement to gratuity absent such conditions.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 forfeiture of gratuity dismissal from service moral turpitude

K. Kishan v. M/s Vijay Nirman Company Pvt. Ltd.

14 Aug 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that insolvency proceedings under the IBC cannot be initiated against an operational debtor when a pre-existing dispute, including a pending Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, exists.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Operational debt Arbitral award Section 34 petition

STATE OF ORISSA AND OTHERS v. STATE (TRYSEM) LIVE STOCK INSPECTOR SANGHA AND OTHERS

14 Aug 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that for direct recruitment, the prescribed qualification must be as per the rules in force at the time of recruitment, not the date of vacancy occurrence, and set aside the High Court's contrary decision.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant direct recruitment educational qualification date of recruitment date of vacancy

Imtiyaz Ramzan Khan v. State of Maharashtra

14 Aug 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Uday Umesh Lalit · 2018 INSC 712

The Supreme Court upheld murder convictions in two cases and mandated video conferencing facilities between counsel and accused to enhance legal aid in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder conviction eyewitness testimony sudden fight defense

Imtiyaz Ramzan Khan v. State of Maharashtra

14 Aug 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against murder convictions under Section 302 IPC and directed all State Legal Services Authorities to facilitate video conferencing between counsel and accused to enhance legal aid.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC murder conviction eyewitness testimony sudden fight defense

Bhagwan Dass & Anr v. State of Haryana

14 Aug 2018 · R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran · 2018 INSC 704

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of police officers for custodial torture but reduced their sentence to the period already served considering their advanced age and delay since the incident.

criminal sentence_modified illegal detention custodial torture Section 326 IPC Section 331 IPC

Bhagwan Dass & Anr. v. State of Haryana

14 Aug 2018 · R. Banumathi; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of police officers for custodial torture but reduced their sentence to the time already served considering the delay and their advanced age.

criminal sentence_modified illegal detention custodial torture Section 326 IPC Section 331 IPC

M/s Alagu Pharmacy & Ors. v. N. Magudeswari

14 Aug 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that eviction decrees based on compromise must satisfy statutory grounds under Rent Control law and allowed condonation of delay where compromise was allegedly obtained under police coercion.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction compromise decree coercion police pressure

M/s Alagu Pharmacy & Ors. v. N. Magudeswari

14 Aug 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Uday Umesh Lalit

The Supreme Court held that eviction decrees on compromise must satisfy statutory grounds under Rent Control Acts and condoned delay in appeal where coercion by police was alleged in entering the compromise.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction compromise decree Rent Control Act coercion

STATE BANK OF INDIA v. V. RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR.

14 Aug 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 applies only to corporate debtors and does not extend to personal guarantors, allowing creditors to proceed against guarantors despite ongoing insolvency proceedings against the corporate debtor.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 14 moratorium personal guarantor corporate debtor