Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India

06 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court decriminalized consensual sexual acts between adults in private by reading down Section 377 IPC, affirming the fundamental rights of the LGBT community to privacy, dignity, and equality under the Constitution.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Section 377 IPC LGBT rights Right to privacy Constitutional morality

NAVTEJ SINGH JOHAR v. UNION OF INDIA

06 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that Section 377 IPC criminalizing consensual sexual acts between adults in private violates fundamental rights and must be read down, affirming constitutional morality and LGBT rights.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Section 377 IPC LGBT rights constitutional morality right to privacy

State of Karnataka v. Yenkareddy & Ors.

06 Sep 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of some accused for lack of specific overt acts and confirmed modification of murder convictions to culpable homicide not amounting to murder with reduced sentences.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part-II IPC Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly

Shivaraj v. Rajendra

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that while breach of insurance policy absolves the insurer from direct liability to the owner, the insurer must pay compensation to the injured claimant with liberty to recover from the owner, and upheld the compensation amount awarded without enhancement.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 insurance policy breach compensation permanent disability

SK Raju @ Abdul Haque @ Jagga v. State of West Bengal

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under the NDPS Act, holding that Section 43 governs searches in public places and that strict compliance with Section 50's safeguards during personal searches is mandatory.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 42 Section 43 Section 50

C.R.KARIYAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

05 Sep 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court modified the conviction from Section 326 IPC to Section 325 IPC, holding that tutoring a child witness on court procedure does not discredit testimony and that absence of a dangerous weapon reduces the offence to voluntarily causing grievous hurt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 326 IPC Section 325 IPC child witness tutoring

C.R.KARIYAPPA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

05 Sep 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court modified the conviction from Section 326 IPC to Section 325 IPC, upheld the appellant's guilt for voluntarily causing grievous hurt, and reduced the sentence considering the evidence and passage of time.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child witness tutoring contradictions in eyewitness testimony Section 325 IPC

Devi Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Sep 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal by reducing the sentence under Section 324 IPC while affirming conviction and sentence under Section 326 IPC based on corroborated evidence including the deceased's diary statement.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 324 IPC Section 326 IPC Diary statement Hostile witness

Devi Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

05 Sep 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 324 and 326 IPC but reduced the sentence under Section 324 IPC, affirming the admissibility of a deceased victim's diary statement corroborated by medical and oral evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 324 IPC Section 326 IPC Diary statement Medical evidence

Radhakrishnan Varenickal v. Union of India

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court upheld the freedom of creative expression in the novel 'Meesha', dismissing the petition to ban it as the impugned content did not violate constitutional restrictions under Article 19(2).

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant freedom of speech and expression Article 19(1)(a) Article 19(2) obscenity test

R. S. Sehrawat v. Rajeev Malhotra

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the contempt conviction of a Junior Engineer for filing a false affidavit, emphasizing the need for specific charges and proof beyond reasonable doubt in contempt proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court false affidavit quasi-criminal proceedings standard of proof

R. S. Sehrawat v. Rajeev Malhotra

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the contempt conviction of a Junior Engineer for filing a false affidavit, emphasizing the need for specific charges and verification of contemporaneous evidence in contempt proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court false affidavit quasi-criminal proceedings standard of proof

State of Maharashtra v. Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · 2018 INSC 783

The Supreme Court held that a writ of habeas corpus cannot be issued against lawful police custody under judicial remand and expunged adverse High Court remarks against police officials for lack of opportunity to explain.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant writ of habeas corpus judicial remand police custody Section 41-A CrPC

State of Maharashtra v. Tasneem Rizwan Siddiquee

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that a writ of habeas corpus cannot be issued against lawful police custody granted by a Magistrate's remand order and expunged adverse remarks against police officials made without opportunity to explain.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant habeas corpus police custody judicial remand Section 41-A CrPC

State of M.P. v. Ratan Singh & Ors.

05 Sep 2018 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused due to unexplained FIR delay, suppression of earliest information, and contradictory eyewitness accounts, emphasizing that framing of issues is not applicable in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant delay in FIR suppression of evidence contradictory eyewitness testimony framing of issues

Kavita v. State of Uttar Pradesh

05 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud · 2018 (7) SCALE 605

The Supreme Court held that the Collector's role in no confidence motion notices under Section 15 of the U.P. Panchayat Act is limited to a summary check of validity and dismissed the appeal challenging the notice on grounds of signature fraud and insufficient notice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant no confidence motion Section 15 U.P. Kshettra Panchayats and Zila Panchayats Adhiniyam Collector's jurisdiction validity of signatures

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shriram & Anr.

05 Sep 2018 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar · 2018 INSC 787

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry cruelty and abetment of suicide case due to lack of cogent evidence and improper trial procedure.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC Section 113-A Indian Evidence Act Section 313 CrPC

M.P. POORVA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITARAN CO. LTD. v. UMA SHANKAR DWIVEDI

05 Sep 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court held that pay revision benefits under the Fifth Pay Commission are not mandatory for employees absorbed from societies excluded by a specific notification, but if benefits are extended to others similarly situated, parity must be maintained, and Sixth and Seventh Pay Commission benefits must be uniformly applied.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Fifth Pay Commission Rural Electrification Cooperative Societies pay revision terms of absorption

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Shriram

05 Sep 2018 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a dowry cruelty and abetment of suicide case due to lack of cogent evidence and improper trial procedure.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC Section 113-A Indian Evidence Act Section 313 CrPC

Haribhau v. The State of Maharashtra

04 Sep 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Uday Umesh Lalit · 2018 INSC 778

The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal by reducing the appellant's jail sentence already served and enhancing the fine, balancing punishment with the appellant's age and antecedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 353 IPC Section 294 IPC Section 504 IPC Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act