Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Omprakash @ Manta v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

01 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court allowed suspension of the appellant's sentence during appeal on the ground of parity with co-accused whose sentences were suspended.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant suspension of sentence parity criminal appeal bail conditions

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited v. Union of India and Another

01 Oct 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 916
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld findings of cartelisation and bid rigging by LPG cylinder manufacturers in tenders to IOCL, affirming penalties under the Competition Act, 2002.

competition appeal_dismissed Significant cartelisation bid rigging Competition Act 2002 Section 3(3)(d)

Rajasthan Cylinders and Containers Limited v. Union of India and Another

01 Oct 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld findings of cartelisation and bid rigging by LPG cylinder manufacturers in tenders to IOCL, affirming penalties under the Competition Act, 2002.

competition appeal_dismissed Significant cartelisation bid rigging Competition Act 2002 Section 3(3)(d)

Kodungallur Film Society & Anr v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Oct 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed strict implementation of guidelines and legislative reforms to prevent mob violence disrupting certified film exhibitions, uphold freedom of expression, and ensure accountability for destruction of public and private property.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant mob violence freedom of speech and expression destruction of public property Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984

Kodungallur Film Society & Anr v. Union of India & Ors.

01 Oct 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court directed strict implementation of guidelines to prevent mob violence against artistic expression, holding organizers and leaders liable for damages and emphasizing the State's duty to uphold constitutional freedoms.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant mob violence freedom of speech and expression destruction of public property Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984

Dr. S.K. Jhunjhunwala v. Dhanwanti Kaur

01 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court held that a surgeon who exercises reasonable skill and obtains valid consent, including for substitute procedures, is not negligent merely because adverse outcomes occur, and set aside a compensation award for alleged medical negligence.

consumer_protection appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence Bolam test consent for surgery consumer protection

Amrish Rana v. State of Himachal Pradesh

28 Sep 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure of prosecution to prove his presence at the crime scene beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the material omission in the FIR and contradictions in witness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt presence of accused omission in FIR contradiction in witness testimony

Romila Thapar v. Union of India

28 Sep 2018 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2018 INSC 912
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that accused persons have no right to choose the investigating agency and dismissed the petition seeking independent or court-monitored investigation into the arrests of five human rights activists in the Bhima Koregaon case, directing them to pursue remedies before jurisdictional courts.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant investigating agency UAPA human rights activists Bhima Koregaon violence

Romila Thapar v. Union of India

28 Sep 2018 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition seeking transfer of investigation and independent inquiry into the arrest of five human rights activists, holding that accused have no right to choose investigating agency and remedies lie before jurisdictional courts.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant investigation accused rights independent investigating agency writ petition

P.S. AYUB v. ASIF JAGIRDAR

28 Sep 2018 · R. BANUMATHI; INDIRA BANERJEE

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to set aside the ex-parte eviction decree upon deposit of rent arrears, restoring the suit and directing the trial court to proceed in accordance with law.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree eviction suit Order IX Rule 13 CPC condonation of delay

P.S. AYUB v. ASIF JAGIRDAR

28 Sep 2018 · R. BANUMATHI; INDIRA BANERJEE

The Supreme Court allowed the tenant's appeal to restore an ex-parte eviction suit upon deposit of arrears and future rent, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural defaults.

civil appeal_allowed Significant eviction suit ex-parte decree condonation of delay arrears of rent

Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi v. State of Gujarat

28 Sep 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld conviction for sexual assault relying on T.I.P. identification corroborated by medical and forensic evidence despite hostile witnesses and procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Test Identification Parade sexual assault hostile witness serological report

Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi v. State of Gujarat

28 Sep 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for sexual assault relying on T.I.P. identification, medical and forensic evidence despite hostile witnesses and procedural lapses regarding serological report.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Test Identification Parade sexual assault hostile witness serological report

Indian Young Lawyers Association v. The State of Kerala

28 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that the exclusion of women aged 10 to 50 years from Sabarimala Temple is unconstitutional discrimination violating fundamental rights and directed that women must be allowed entry.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Sabarimala Temple women's entry gender discrimination Article 14

Indian Young Lawyers Association v. State of Kerala

28 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that the exclusion of women aged 10 to 50 years from Sabarimala Temple is unconstitutional discrimination violating fundamental rights and directed their entry to be allowed.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark Sabarimala Temple exclusion of women Article 14 Article 15

Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency

28 Sep 2018 · Uday Umesh Lalit; K. M. Joseph · 2021 INSC 295
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that house arrest does not constitute custody under Section 167 CrPC for default bail calculation, affirming the High Court's exclusion of the house arrest period from custody and dismissing the appellant's appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant house arrest Section 167 CrPC default bail transit remand

Gautam Navlakha v. National Investigation Agency

28 Sep 2018 · Uday Umesh Lalit; K. M. Joseph
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

House arrest without magistrate-authorized detention under Section 167 CrPC does not count as custody for default bail calculation, and such period must be excluded.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant default bail Section 167 CrPC house arrest transit remand

Pattipati Venkateswarlu Naidu v. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.)

27 Sep 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court condoned delay conditionally and enhanced compensation for pomegranate trees in land acquisition cases to Rs. 3000 per tree, denying statutory benefits for the delay period.

property appeal_allowed Significant enhancement of compensation delay condonation statutory benefits land acquisition

Padmini Singha v. State of Assam

27 Sep 2018 · Dipak Misra; A.M. Khanwilkar; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud

The Supreme Court held that procedural irregularity in convening a No Confidence Motion meeting under the Assam Panchayat Act is waived if the concerned President participates and votes, validating the resolution passed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant No Confidence Motion Assam Panchayat Act, 1994 Section 15(1) delegation of authority

GOPAL NAGAR COOPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD v. MOHD. ASLAM @ ABU BAKAR

27 Sep 2018 · R. BANUMATHI; INDIRA BANERJEE · 2018 INSC 906

The Supreme Court held that a well reasoned trial court order setting aside ex parte decrees due to improper service must be upheld and the High Court's remand was unwarranted, directing trial courts to proceed with the suits fairly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree partition suit service of summons sale deed