Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Dwarika Das Rathi v. State of Chhattisgarh

09 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court granted absolute anticipatory bail with conditions including attachment of properties to recover alleged deficit in a rice mill fraud case, allowing investigation to proceed and directing trial court to consider recovery at trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. Section 420 IPC Section 409 IPC

Sushil Kumar Agarwal v. Meenakshi Sadhu & Ors.

09 Oct 2018 · A M Khanwilkar; Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a developer's suit for specific performance under a development agreement is barred under Section 14(3)(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 unless the contract is precise, the developer has a substantial interest, and possession conditions are met, interpreting possession requirement purposively to avoid absurdity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 14(3)(c) development agreement specific performance

Prakash Chand Meena v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

09 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court upheld anticipatory bail and held that regular bail and modification of bail conditions are within the Trial Court's jurisdiction, refusing to interfere with bail granted or direct deposits.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. regular bail trial court jurisdiction

Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Pvt. Ltd. v. The Official Liquidator of Mahendra Petrochemicals Ltd.

08 Oct 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal holding that an assignee cannot claim secured creditor status under the SARFAESI Act by taking contradictory stands and that only specified entities qualify as secured creditors under the Act.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act secured creditor assignment of debt Section 130 Transfer of Property Act

Suzuki Parasrampuria Suitings Pvt. Ltd. v. The Official Liquidator of Mahendra Petrochemicals Ltd.

08 Oct 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; Navin Sinha; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal holding that it cannot claim substitution as a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act after taking inconsistent stands, affirming the rejection of its application and recall petition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant secured creditor SARFAESI Act Transfer of Property Act Section 130 assignment of debt

Madan Mohan v. Jawahar Lal

05 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court disposed of inheritance dispute appeals based on a binding amicable settlement, disallowing non-contesting respondents from pursuing claims at the final stage.

civil appeal_allowed amicable settlement inheritance dispute family harmony mediation

ArcelorMittal India Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Gupta & Ors.

04 Oct 2018 · R.F. Nariman; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court clarified that eligibility under Section 29A of the IBC is determined at the resolution plan submission date, and mere share transfers do not cure ineligibility unless overdue amounts are paid, directing reconsideration of resolution plans with opportunity to cure.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 29A Resolution Plan Eligibility Non-Performing Asset

Hindustan Antibiotics Limited v. Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority

04 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer · 2018 INSC 934

The Supreme Court held that disputes between public undertakings and State agencies involving land matters are not maintainable by writ petition and directed reference to arbitration for resolution.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant writ petition maintainability civil remedy public undertakings land dispute

Hindustan Antibiotics Limited v. Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority

04 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition appeal and referred the land dispute between a public undertaking and MHADA to arbitration, emphasizing the preference for civil remedies and amicable settlement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant writ petition maintainability civil suit remedy public undertaking disputes land disposal

Samir Ahmed Rafiqahmed Ansari v. The State of Gujarat

04 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from illegal manufacture under Section 25(1AA) to illegal possession under Section 25(1B)(a) of the Arms Act and reduced the sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1AA) Section 25(1B)(a) possession of arms without licence

Samir Ahmed Rafiqahmed Ansari v. The State of Gujarat

04 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court modified the conviction from illegal manufacture under Section 25(1AA) to illegal possession under Section 25(1B)(a) of the Arms Act and reduced the sentence to the period already served.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Arms Act, 1959 Section 25(1AA) Section 25(1B)(a) possession of firearm without licence

KANAILAL SARKAR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

04 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee · 2018 INSC 930

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide based on the dying declaration and evidence of harassment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC dying declaration harassment

KANAILAL SARKAR v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

04 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide based on harassment and a reliable dying declaration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC dying declaration harassment

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Naveen Kumar

04 Oct 2018 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused due to lack of corroborative evidence and held that improved statements under Section 161 CrPC require independent corroboration for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly ocular testimony Section 161 CrPC disclosure statement

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Naveen Kumar

04 Oct 2018 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused due to lack of corroborative evidence and improper reliance on subsequent statements and common object recovery.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly ocular evidence corroboration disclosure statement

Sunny Khanna v. State of Chhattisgarh

04 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court modified the appellants' murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC in a case arising from a sudden fight, reducing their sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 Part I IPC Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC

Punjab State Power Supply Corporation Ltd. v. Kulwant Singh

03 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that payment of back-wages for violation of Section 25-F is not automatic and allowed a lump sum compensation in lieu of full back-wages in the peculiar facts of the case.

labor appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 25-F Industrial Disputes Act back-wages termination of service industrial dispute

Pappu @ Hans Raj v. State of Punjab & Anr.

03 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court upheld the life imprisonment convictions of appellants for murder under Section 302 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, dismissing their appeals.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 302 IPC murder life imprisonment eyewitness testimony

Union of India v. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd

03 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's order limiting penalty and interest on unauthorized telecom usage, allowing recalculation based on actual payments and granting liberty to the appellant to seek review with valid legal backing.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant unauthorized telecom resource usage penalty and interest UASL license OSP registration

Union of India v. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd

03 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's interim order limiting penalty and interest on unauthorized telecom use, allowing the appellant to seek review with valid material, and ordered refund of amounts if no review is filed.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant show cause notice unauthorized telecom resources penalty and interest UASL license