Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/Retired Employees Association v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

26 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul · 2018 INSC 1002
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that retirees under the SVRS-2004 Scheme are not entitled to the additional five years of qualifying service benefit under the 1995 Pension Scheme, affirming strict adherence to the statutory scheme's explicit terms.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme 2004 General Insurance Employees Pension Scheme 1995 additional qualifying service pension calculation

National Insurance Special Voluntary Retired/Retired Employees Association v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.

26 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that employees retiring under the SVRS-2004 Scheme are not entitled to the five-year additional notional service benefit under the 1995 Pension Scheme due to explicit exclusion in the SVRS-2004 Scheme.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme 2004 General Insurance Employees Pension Scheme 1995 notional service addition pension calculation

Amit Kumar v. Sonila

26 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; Sanjay Kishan Kaul

The Supreme Court upheld the custody arrangement in a mutual consent divorce decree granting custody to the father, emphasizing the binding nature of consent terms and the paramount welfare of the children.

family appeal_allowed Significant custody of children mutual consent divorce Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 financial obligations

Ali Akbar v. State of Kerala

26 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that a High Court remand for land acquisition compensation must be open, allowing both parties to present evidence and contentions afresh before the Reference Court, which shall decide independently.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation fixation open remand Reference Court

Ramvir v. State of Uttar Pradesh

26 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder and unlawful assembly charges due to lack of evidence and upheld the finality of acquittal under Sections 148 and 149 IPC not challenged by the State.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly

Ramvir v. State of Uttar Pradesh

26 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder and unlawful assembly charges due to lack of evidence and upheld the finality of his prior acquittal under Sections 148/149 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 148 IPC Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly

RAGHUBIR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

26 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the intra court appeal to the High Court Division Bench for fresh consideration on merits due to the appellate court's failure to address the issues raised.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act Section 4 notification intra court appeal procedural impropriety

Raghubir Singh v. Rajasthan State

26 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the Rajasthan High Court's summary dismissal of an intra-court appeal challenging land acquisition notifications and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of all issues.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act Section 4 notification intra-court appeal Division Bench

RAGHUBIR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

26 Oct 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court set aside the Division Bench's order dismissing the intra court appeal without merit-based adjudication and remanded the case for fresh disposal on all issues under the Land Acquisition Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act Section 4 notification intra court appeal Division Bench

Ali Akbar v. State of Kerala

26 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court held that a High Court remand for fixation of compensation in land acquisition cases is an open remand allowing both parties to adduce evidence and raise all contentions afresh before the Reference Court.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation fixation open remand Reference Court

Dalip Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

25 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld lawful resumption of an industrial plot by HUDA due to prolonged non-compliance with allotment conditions, dismissing the heirs' appeal seeking revocation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial plot allotment HUDA Act 1977 Resumption of land Non-compliance of allotment conditions

Dalip Singh and Others v. State of Haryana and Others

25 Oct 2018 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld lawful resumption of an industrial plot by HUDA for prolonged non-compliance with allotment conditions, dismissing the appeal of the legal heirs.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial plot allotment HUDA Act 1977 Resumption of land Non-compliance of allotment conditions

State of Rajasthan v. Madan @ Madaniya

25 Oct 2018 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to major contradictions in prosecution evidence and lack of reliable corroboration, emphasizing the benefit of doubt principle.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant benefit of doubt child witness evidence contradictions in prosecution evidence acquittal

State of Rajasthan v. Madan @ Madaniya

25 Oct 2018 · N. V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the accused in a murder case due to material contradictions in prosecution evidence and lack of independent corroboration, reinforcing the benefit of doubt principle.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant benefit of doubt child witness evidence contradictions in prosecution evidence acquittal

EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD v. BIBHAS CHANDRA BAKSHI

25 Oct 2018 · KURIAN JOSEPH; A.M. KHANWILKAR

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals challenging service-related orders concerning a retired employee, declining interference and leaving the question of law open.

civil appeal_dismissed service law retirement judicial restraint civil appeal

The Kelvin Jute Co. Ltd. Workers Provident Fund and Anr. v. Krishna Kumar Agarwala and Others

25 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; R. F. Nariman

The Supreme Court dismissed applications seeking modification of its order on provident fund dues, directing parties to seek review before the High Court on fraud allegations and ordered transfer of deposited funds as per prior directions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Provident Fund Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Article 142 Constitution of India Review petition

Gopal Jha v. Supreme Court of India

25 Oct 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan · 2018 INSC 998

The Supreme Court upheld the eligibility criteria and SCBA membership requirement for allotment of chambers, fixed a proximate block period for active practice, and directed periodic invitations for applications, dismissing challenges to the allotment rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Lawyers Chambers Allotment Supreme Court Bar Association Advocate-on-Record Eligibility Criteria

Gopal Jha v. Supreme Court of India

25 Oct 2018 · A.K. Sikri; Ashok Bhushan

The Supreme Court upheld the eligibility criteria and SCBA membership requirement for allotment of chambers, modified the block period to ensure active practice, and referred residency issues for further consideration.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Supreme Court Lawyers’ Chambers Allotment Rules Advocates-on-Record Supreme Court Bar Association Eligibility criteria

Vasudevan Embranthiri v. Gopalakrishnan & Ors.

25 Oct 2018 · Kurian Joseph; A. M. Khanwilkar

The Supreme Court exercised its Article 142 jurisdiction to equitably divide disputed properties, superseding prior wills and ending a three-decade-long property dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 142 Constitution of India letters of administration property dispute equitable division

Government of India and Others v. V. Shanmuganathan

25 Oct 2018 · N.V. Ramana; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court modified the disciplinary punishment from removal to compulsory retirement and granted retiral benefits from the date the Government withheld reinstatement, emphasizing proportionality in service penalties.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings removal from service compulsory retirement unauthorized absence