Supreme Court of India
14,826 judgments
SRI RAMNARAYAN MILLS LTD v. SECRETARY COIMBATORE DISTRICT TEXTILE WORKERS UNION
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the employer's attempt to add "break in service" as a ground for punishment in Certified Standing Orders, holding it arbitrary and detrimental to employees' gratuity rights.
SRI RAMNARAYAN MILLS LTD v. SECRETARY COIMBATORE DISTRICT TEXTILE WORKERS UNION
The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of the employer's application to add "break in service" as a ground for punishment in Certified Standing Orders, holding it unreasonable and detrimental to employees' gratuity rights.
Dr. Ramesh Badlani v. State of M.P.
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the High Court’s refusal to grant bail, directing the petitioner to seek relief from the Sessions Judge on medical grounds.
Dr. Ramesh Badlani v. State of M.P.
The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner's bail plea, upholding the High Court's refusal and directing the petitioner to seek relief from the Sessions Judge on medical grounds.
Pratap Mehta v. Sunil Gupta & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the invalidation of two disputed elections for the State Bar Council's representative to the Bar Council of India due to non-compliance with statutory procedural requirements and directed fresh elections.
Sivasankar V.K. v. V.K. Sivan and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court and High Court decisions interpreting the Will to grant the plaintiff a one-third share in the suit property, dismissing the appellant's claim for equal shares among male descendants.
Sivasankar V.K. v. V.K. Sivan and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the lower courts' decision granting the plaintiff a one-third share in the suit property under the Will, dismissing the appellant's claim for equal shares among male descendants.
North East Karnataka Road Transport Corporation v. Smt. Sujatha
The Supreme Court upheld the compensation awarded under the Workmen's Compensation Act but clarified that interest on the awarded amount is payable from the date of the accident, not from the date of the award.
Geeta Devi & Anr v. State of Rajasthan
The Supreme Court appointed an Arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act to mediate disputes overlapping with criminal proceedings and granted interim protection from arrest to the petitioner pending further hearing.
Geeta Devi & Anr v. State of Rajasthan
The Supreme Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes and granted interim protection from arrest to the petitioners pending further hearing.
Arun Kumar Jha v. Ranvir Singh
The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal for enhanced compensation recognizing 100% functional disability for leg amputation, directing the Insurance Company to pay Rs. 10 lakhs with interest if delayed.
Arun Kumar Jha v. Ranvir Singh
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and enhanced the compensation to Rs. 10 lakhs for 100% functional disability due to leg amputation, applying precedents and permitting retrospective benefit of amendments.
Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court held that death penalty cases require reasoned orders and genuine hearing under CrPC provisions, commuted the appellant's death sentence to life imprisonment while upholding conviction.
Babasaheb Maruti Kamble v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment with a 20-year minimum term, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders and genuine hearing in death penalty cases.
Jitendra @ Jeetu v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction but commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment with a 20-year minimum term, emphasizing reasoned orders and deeper scrutiny in capital punishment cases.
M/S HINDON FORGE PVT. LTD. v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
The Supreme Court held that a borrower can file an application under Section 17(1) of the SARFAESI Act only after the secured creditor takes actual physical possession of secured assets under Section 13(4), and not at the stage of symbolic possession or issuance of possession notice.
Mukhtyar Jabbar Tadvi v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including a reliable dying declaration and recovery of the weapon, dismissing the appellant's challenge.
Mukhtyar Jabbar Tadvi v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the murder conviction based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including a reliable dying declaration, recovery of weapon, and abscondence of the accused.
Kamil v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC despite omission to formally frame the charge, holding no failure of justice or prejudice occurred.
Kamil v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC despite omission to frame a specific charge, holding no failure of justice or prejudice occurred.