Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Geeta v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 CrPC application for quashing criminal proceedings under Section 498-A IPC and remanded the case for fresh consideration on merits after notice to respondents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing petition High Court jurisdiction Section 498-A IPC

Sangeeta Agrawal v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 CrPC application for quashing criminal proceedings, directing a fresh merit-based hearing with proper factual and legal analysis.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of charge sheet High Court powers criminal proceedings

Surjeet Singh & Anr. v. Sadhu Singh & Ors.

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals and upheld the High Court's remand of the case to the first Appellate Court for fresh consideration on merits, emphasizing non-interference with justified remand orders.

civil appeal_dismissed remand order High Court revision petition first Appellate Court interference by Supreme Court

Surjeet Singh & Anr. v. Sadhu Singh & Ors.

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeals and upheld the High Court's order remanding the case to the first Appellate Court for fresh consideration on merits, emphasizing non-interference with remand orders.

civil appeal_dismissed remand first Appellate Court High Court revision civil appeal

Dr. Jagdish Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 CrPC application for quashing criminal proceedings, remanding the case for fresh consideration of facts and law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing order High Court powers inherent powers

Dr. Jagdish Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra
Cites 0 · Cited by 71

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 CrPC application for quashing criminal proceedings, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of facts and law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing petition inherent powers High Court jurisdiction

Omveer Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 CrPC application for quashing criminal proceedings, remanding the matter for fresh consideration of facts and law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing order High Court powers factual matrix

Omveer Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a Section 482 CrPC application for quashing criminal proceedings, remanding the case for fresh consideration with proper factual analysis.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC inherent powers quashing order High Court jurisdiction

Meera Mishra v. Satish Kumar

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court remanded the case for fresh adjudication by the Commissioner after holding that an unreasoned appellate order must be reconsidered with a reasoned decision addressing all issues.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fair price shop license unreasoned order remand writ petition

Meera Mishra v. Satish Kumar

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court remanded the case for fresh consideration by the appellate authority after holding that an unreasoned order is legally unsustainable and parties are entitled to a reasoned decision on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fair price shop license unreasoned order remand appellate authority

Roshina T v. Abdul Azeez K.T.

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked to decide private property possession disputes where civil remedies exist, setting aside the High Court's order restoring possession via writ.

civil appeal_allowed Significant writ petition Article 226 possession dispute civil suit

Damodar Valley Corporation v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission

03 Dec 2018 · Ranjan Gogoi; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph · 2018 (8) SCC 281

The Supreme Court upheld the tariff order denying double benefit of interest on capital under Section 38 of the DVC Act, affirming that return on equity and interest on loan under tariff regulations suffice, and rejected reopening of the cumulative depreciation issue.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Damodar Valley Corporation Act, 1948 Section 38 interest on capital Electricity Act, 2003

Kanubhai Bhagvanbhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's confirmation of a murder conviction for failure to properly examine evidence and remanded the case for fresh consideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 386(b) CrPC appellate jurisdiction evidence appreciation

Kanubhai Bhagvanbhai Nayak v. State of Gujarat

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's confirmation of murder conviction for failure to independently examine evidence and remanded the case for fresh consideration on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 386(b) CrPC criminal appeal appellate jurisdiction

Shri H.D. Sharma v. Northern India Textile Research Association

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that a one-time ex gratia payment does not constitute wages under Section 6E(2) of the UP Industrial Disputes Act, and the employer’s payment of full wages excluding such ex gratia satisfies the statutory condition for dismissal approval.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 6E(2) UP Industrial Disputes Act wages definition ex gratia payment dismissal approval

Shri H.D. Sharma v. Northern India Textile Research Association

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that an isolated ex gratia payment does not constitute wages under Section 6E(2) of the UP Industrial Disputes Act, and the employer's payment of full wages for one month validated the dismissal approval, dismissing the workman's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Section 6E(2) UP Industrial Disputes Act wages definition ex gratia payment dismissal approval

Mallappa Dead by L.Rs. & Ors. v. Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr.

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court restored the Reference Court's compensation award for land acquisition at Rs. 18,900 per Gunta, rejecting the High Court's reduction and emphasizing evidence-based market valuation.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation market value Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966

Masroor Ahmad Khan v. State of Uttarakhand

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that the appellant's possession of municipal property without legal title was unauthorized trespass, dismissed his appeal, ordered eviction, and fixed damages for wrongful occupation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant possession unauthorized occupation trespass auction

Masroor Ahmad Khan v. State of Uttarakhand

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the appellant's possession of municipal quarter No.6 was unauthorized trespass, dismissed his appeal, and ordered eviction with damages payable from June 1990.

property appeal_dismissed Significant unauthorized possession trespass auction sale deed

Manju Saxena v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Dec 2018 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

Refusal to accept reasonable alternate employment constitutes abandonment of service, negating continuous service status and entitlement to enhanced severance under the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25F abandonment of service continuous service