Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

Sushil Thomas Abraham v. M/s Skyline Build. Thr.

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that a prior rejection of indigent status at trial does not bar an appellant from seeking indigent status at the appellate stage under Order 44 CPC, mandating an inquiry into indigency before allowing appeal without court fees.

civil appeal_allowed Significant indigent person Order 33 Rule 1 CPC Order 44 Rule 1 CPC Order 44 Rule 3 CPC

Sushil Thomas Abraham v. M/s Skyline Build. Thr.

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that rejection of indigent status at trial does not bar a fresh inquiry at the appellate stage under Order 44 CPC, and remanded the case for such inquiry before proceeding with the appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant indigent person Order 33 Rule 1 CPC Order 44 Rule 1 CPC Order 44 Rule 3 CPC

Deputy Executive Engineer v. Kuberbhai Kanjibhai

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that illegal termination of a daily wage worker due to procedural defects warrants monetary compensation instead of automatic reinstatement with back wages, especially after long delay.

labour appeal_allowed Significant daily wage worker illegal termination reinstatement back wages

Birla Institute of Technology v. The State of Jharkhand

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that teachers are not "employees" under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and thus not entitled to gratuity under the Act, allowing the appellant's appeal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 2(e) definition of employee teacher gratuity

Rajasthan State v. Gram Vikas Samiti, Shivdaspura

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's summary dismissal of a second appeal concerning disputed land ownership and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant second appeal Section 100 CPC substantial question of law permanent injunction

State of Rajasthan v. Gram Vikas Samiti

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of the State's second appeal without reasons and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on substantial questions of law relating to title and possession of State land.

civil appeal_allowed Significant second appeal Section 100 CPC substantial question of law permanent injunction

Kamal Kumar v. Premlata Joshi

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract precludes the grant of specific performance.

civil appeal_dismissed specific performance readiness and willingness equitable relief concurrent findings

Mahadevappa v. State of Karnataka

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a husband for dowry-related cruelty and homicidal death of his wife caused by pouring kerosene oil and setting her on fire.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 498-A IPC Section 302 IPC homicidal death

Ragini Sinha v. State of Bihar

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court dismissed the employer's appeals against wage and penalty orders under the Minimum Wages Act, affirming concurrent findings of fact and procedural requirements including impleadment of necessary parties.

labor appeal_dismissed Minimum Wages Act, 1948 minimum wages penalty concurrent findings of fact

Ragini Sinha v. State of Bihar

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court dismissed the employer's appeal against wage and penalty awards under the Minimum Wages Act, affirming concurrent findings of fact and emphasizing the necessity of impleading legal representatives of deceased workers.

labor appeal_dismissed Minimum Wages Act, 1948 claim petition wages penalty

Deputy Executive Engineer v. Kuberbhai Kanjibhai

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that illegal termination of a daily-wage worker due to procedural defects warrants monetary compensation instead of automatic reinstatement with back wages, modifying the award accordingly.

labour appeal_allowed Significant daily-wage worker illegal termination reinstatement back wages

M/s Wine Kornder v. Inspector State Excise

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court upheld the Commissioner State Excise’s authority to hear pending appeals, expunged adverse High Court remarks against her, and held that anticipatory stay orders are impermissible, emphasizing judicial restraint and the need for substantial material to prove bias.

administrative appeal_allowed and appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 Commissioner State Excise appellate authority bias plea

Digi Cable Network (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra · 2019 INSC 27

The Supreme Court upheld the cancellation of MSO permission due to denial of mandatory security clearance, ruling that in national security matters, denial without prior hearing does not violate natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant security clearance Cable Television Network Rules Rule 11C natural justice

State of Uttarakhand v. Raj Kumar

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that monetary compensation, not reinstatement with back wages, is appropriate for daily wage workers illegally terminated due to procedural defects after a long delay.

labor appeal_allowed Significant daily wage worker illegal termination reinstatement monetary compensation

State of Uttarakhand v. Raj Kumar

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; Indu Malhotra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a daily wage worker terminated illegally due to procedural defects is entitled to monetary compensation instead of reinstatement with back wages, especially after a long delay in raising the dispute.

labor appeal_allowed Significant daily wage worker reinstatement monetary compensation Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Punjab Financial Corporation v. M/s Paulbro Leathers Pvt. Ltd.

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; R. Subhash Reddy · 2019 INSC 26

The Supreme Court allowed the appellant's appeal and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on the disputed loan liability arising post-settlement, emphasizing merits-based examination over summary quashing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loan default one-time settlement Chartered Accountant report writ petition

Punjab Financial Corporation v. M/s Paulbro Leathers Pvt. Ltd.

07 Jan 2019 · Abhay Manohar Sapre; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the case for fresh adjudication on the disputed loan liability arising from a settlement, emphasizing the need for merits-based examination before quashing demands.

civil appeal_allowed Significant one-time settlement loan default Chartered Accountant report writ petition

National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Vedic Resorts and Hotels Pvt. Ltd.

07 Jan 2019 · Ajay Rastogi; Bela M. Trivedi
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the consumer commission's order directing the insurer to pay the claim, holding that the insurer failed to prove the loss was excluded under the malicious damage clause.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance claim exclusion clause malicious damage burden of proof

Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v. Central Bureau of Investigation

04 Jan 2019 · A. K. Sikri; S. Abdul Nazeer

The Supreme Court held that the power under Section 311 CrPC to summon witnesses must be exercised cautiously and refused to allow repeated belated summons of a witness whose attendance was not procured for over a decade, thereby quashing the lower courts' orders permitting such examination.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 CrPC summoning witness abuse of process delay in trial

M/S MDDA RAMKY ISBT LTD. v. OMBIR SINGH TOMAR

04 Jan 2019 · R. Banumathi; Indira Banerjee · 2019 INSC 13

The Supreme Court dismissed the contempt petition against the respondent for non-payment of licence fees, holding that pending execution proceedings preclude a finding of intentional violation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt petition execution petition licence fee common area maintenance charges