Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Shri Siddhi Vinayak Medical College and Hospital Sambhal U.P. v. Union of India

08 Oct 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 5883
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking approval for additional MBBS seats by holding it lacked territorial jurisdiction and that the appropriate forum was the High Court of Uttar Pradesh under the doctrine of forum conveniens.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 cause of action forum conveniens

Singh v. Pawan Kumar Lal

08 Oct 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7942

The High Court upheld the setting aside of an interim maintenance order passed after adjournment, holding that the court becomes functus officio upon granting adjournment and must decide maintenance applications based on pleadings and affidavits.

family petition_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 adjournment functus officio

Seema Lal v. Pawan Kumar Lal & Anr.

08 Oct 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:7941

The Delhi High Court held that inconsistencies in statements during matrimonial proceedings do not amount to perjury warranting Section 340 CrPC proceedings, especially when the underlying order is set aside.

family appeal_allowed Significant Section 340 CrPC perjury matrimonial dispute maintenance

Dalmia Family Office Trust & Anr. v. Getamber Anand & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:7895-DB

The Delhi High Court held that arbitral tribunals have powers akin to civil courts to initiate contempt proceedings for baseless allegations and misconduct during arbitration, accepted the apology of Respondent No.1 with costs, and cautioned against repetition of such conduct.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 27(5) Section 17(2) Contempt of Court

Shree Shyam Enterprises v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.

08 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7838

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes where the respondent failed to initiate arbitration despite the petitioner exhausting the dispute resolution mechanism.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of Arbitrator Arbitration Clause

Shree Shyam Enterprises v. Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation Ltd.

08 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7837

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the respondent's objection regarding a third party and directing arbitration to resolve contractual payment disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Arbitration clause

M/S Dropadi Foods v. Government of NCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:7872

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of kiosk licenses at Anand Vihar ISBT for redevelopment, holding that explicit contractual termination clauses override claims of legitimate expectation and that the termination was lawful and not arbitrary.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant license termination redevelopment Inter State Bus Terminal legitimate expectation

Shabnam Burney v. Union of India and Ors

08 Oct 2024 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7867-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the stay applications, holding that unauthorised constructions in ecologically sensitive Zone 'O' and flood plains without statutory permissions are liable to demolition to protect river Yamuna's environment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unauthorised colonies flood plains Zone O river Yamuna

Good Year Security Services v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · MANMOHAN, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7857-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld stringent eligibility criteria and evaluation parameters in a security services tender, dismissing the petitioner's challenge of arbitrariness and unfair exclusion.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender conditions eligibility criteria arbitrariness judicial review

Brij Mohan Singh v. Inderjeet Kaur

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7862
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated appeal challenging dismissal of an interim application, holding that a delay of over five years without sufficient cause cannot be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC sufficient cause

Upinder Kaur v. Harish Kumar Jawa

08 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7861

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief by keeping the eviction order in abeyance subject to the petitioner paying user and occupation charges, following the principle that tenants must pay market rent during pendency of eviction appeals.

property appeal_allowed Significant eviction user and occupation charges leave to defend landlord-tenant relationship

W/SI Dipika v. Manpal & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7829
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in an attempted rape case due to material contradictions and admissions of a false complaint by the prosecutrix, emphasizing the need for reliable testimony and caution against frivolous prosecution.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant attempt to rape prosecutrix testimony contradictions in evidence leave to appeal

Jyotsna v. Baldev Raj Madan & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7855

The Delhi High Court granted the plaintiff one final opportunity to cross-examine a witness through counsel after her right was closed for irrelevant questioning, imposing costs and directing expeditious trial continuation.

civil appeal_allowed cross-examination irrelevant questions trial court discretion perpetual injunction

Shailendra Kumar Singh v. HCL Comnet Systems Services Ltd

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7854

The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising from employer-employee relationships do not fall within the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and Consumer Fora lack jurisdiction to entertain such complaints.

consumer petition_dismissed Consumer Protection Act, 2019 consumer definition employer-employee relationship jurisdiction of Consumer Fora

Subhash Chandra Das & Ors. v. Afaq Ahmad

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7853

The High Court dismissed the petition seeking directions for arrest of the Judgment Debtor as the Executing Court had already issued adequate orders for execution.

civil petition_dismissed Execution Petition Decree Holder Judgment Debtor Warrant of Arrest

Sushma Nanda & Ors. v. Axis Bank Limited & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7852

The High Court directed the Trial Court to hear the petitioners' application for interim relief afresh after rectifying procedural irregularities caused by non-compliance and erroneous order publication.

civil other Procedural Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC interim injunction vacation of interim order procedural irregularity

Lords Creative Infrasolution Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Dr. Abhishek Bhatnagar

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7851

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte order and allowed the parties to record their amicable settlement under Order XXIII CPC, disposing of the civil suit accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed ex parte order civil suit settlement Order XXIII CPC

Kuldeep Singh & Ors. v. Attar Singh & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7850

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside the order of abatement and permitted the legal representatives of the deceased defendant to be brought on record in a partition suit, condoning delay due to procedural transfer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit legal representatives order of abatement condonation of delay

M/S PARAMOUNT INDENTORS AND SALES v. M/S EMERALD MULTIVENTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

08 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7847

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner liberty to seek recall of the Trial Court's order directing fresh service on the company and imposition of costs, emphasizing procedural compliance and discretion of the Trial Court.

civil other service of summons company representation authorization cost imposition

Vinod Kumar Bali v. Ashish Bali & Anr

08 Oct 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:7842

The Delhi High Court upheld a senior citizen's right to evict his son and daughter-in-law for ill-treatment under the Senior Citizens Act, holding that such eviction rights coexist with, but are not overridden by, the daughter-in-law's residence rights under the Domestic Violence Act.

family petition_allowed Significant Senior Citizens Act 2007 Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules 2009 eviction ill-treatment