Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sandeep Kumar Gautam & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7846

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS Section 498A IPC mutual consent divorce

Lal Bahadur Pandey @ Santosh Pandey v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

09 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7860

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 380, 411, and 34 IPC on the basis of amicable settlement and the minor nature of the offence, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

M.S. Balakrishnan and Anr v. Registrar of Coop Societies and Ors

09 Oct 2024 · Chief Justice Manmohan; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7910-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Financial Commissioner's order setting aside an invalid Inquiry Report and dismissed the petition challenging the subsequent inquiry proceedings and summons under the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Inquiry Officer appointment Financial Commissioner order Section 62 inquiry

BCC Developers & Promoters Pvt. Ltd. v. Bhupender Singh & Anr

09 Oct 2024 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7909-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act restraining the appellant from alienating disputed property pending arbitration, emphasizing prima facie satisfaction and protective jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration Act interim relief Agreement to Sell property alienation

Union of India v. Shri Waryam Mast & Ors.

09 Oct 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:7906-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to avoid compliance with Tribunal directions on cadre restructuring, emphasizing judicial consistency and directing adherence to earlier orders subject to a pending related petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Tribunal directions Programme Officers cadre judicial consistency Coordinate Bench

Hemant Gaur & Anr v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

09 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7848

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under minor IPC offences following an amicable settlement between cousins, emphasizing the scope of Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process in criminal proceedings involving civil disputes.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 528 BNSS quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Satish Sharma v. State (GNCTD) and Ors.

09 Oct 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8672

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging dismissal of a complaint alleging illegal detention by police, holding that the lower courts rightly found no prima facie case and that inherent jurisdiction should be exercised sparingly.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 528 BNSS Section 200 CrPC illegal detention police misconduct

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -3 v. Dharam Raj Construction & Infrastructure Private Limited

08 Oct 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7816-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the 2015 amendment to Section 153C of the Income Tax Act applies retrospectively, permitting proceedings based on documents that 'pertain to' the assessee even if they do not strictly 'belong to' them.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act Finance Act 2015 amendment belongs to vs pertains to search and seizure

ITC Limited v. Arpita Agro Products Pvt Ltd & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:7796

The Delhi High Court upheld an ad interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'POWRNYM' and similar trade dress, holding it infringed the plaintiff's assigned trademarks 'NIMYLE' and 'JOR-POWR' and constituted passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off assignment of trademark trade dress

Satish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:7810-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the dismissal of a CISF Sub-Inspector falsely implicated in a sexual harassment case, directing his reinstatement with benefits and partial back wages.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry sexual harassment dismissal from service reinstatement

Amarjit Singh Kohli v. Ashok Kumar Sapra

08 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8486

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for specific performance based on an oral agreement to sell immovable property is maintainable and cannot be summarily rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if the plaint discloses a cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Oral Agreement to Sell Specific Performance Order VII Rule 11 CPC Cause of Action

Ashish Azad v. The National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8484

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Ashish Azad, upholding the MACT's finding that he was the driver liable to pay compensation for a motor vehicle accident despite his claim of being a passenger.

motor_vehicles appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driver liability compensation FIR

KANBE WATER TECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. DOMUS GREENS PRIVATE LIMITED

08 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7878

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s notice satisfied Section 21 requirements and appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, deleting respondent no.2 from the parties.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 notice Appointment of Sole Arbitrator

KANBE WATER TECH PRIVATE LIMITED v. ANAND DEVINE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

08 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7879

The Delhi High Court held that the notice dated 18.03.2024 constituted a valid invocation under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed an independent Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

other appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 notice Appointment of arbitrator

Raj Kumar Wadhera v. Canara Bank

08 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:8367
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that AVSD with severe pulmonary hypertension is not a recognized disability under the Disabilities Acts but ordered restoration of salary deducted without due process during the COVID-19 pandemic.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disability definition Persons with Disabilities Act 1995 Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 AVSD

Abhijit Kumar Ravidas v. The National Insurance Company Limited & Ors.

08 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8324

The Delhi High Court held that a registered owner remains liable to third-party compensation for a motor vehicle accident until ownership is officially transferred in RTO records, even if the vehicle was sold and possession delivered prior to the accident.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant registered owner liability motor vehicle accident transfer of ownership RTO records

M/S Adams International Exports (P) Ltd & Anr. v. Vishan Dass Narang

08 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8193

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting tenants' plea of defective summons and delay in filing leave to defend, and held tenants liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of revision.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25B eviction leave to defend

M/S Adam Paper Products Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Vishan Dass Narang

08 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8192

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, rejecting tenants' plea of defective summons and delay in filing leave to defend, and held tenants liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of revision petition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction leave to defend user and occupation charges

Mohan Singh v. Vishan Dass Narang

08 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8191

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, dismissed the tenant's revision petition for defective service and delay, and held the tenant liable to pay user and occupation charges during pendency of the revision petition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend eviction user and occupation charges

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 v. ESYS Information Technologies Ltd

08 Oct 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7812-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, affirming that goodwill paid as part of asset acquisition is an intangible asset eligible for depreciation and rejecting the Revenue’s contention on arm’s length price adjustments involving a foreign associated enterprise.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant goodwill intangible asset depreciation Section 37(1) Income Tax Act