Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Prem Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the executing court's order directing personal appearance of MCD officers to assist in execution of a 1996 decree, dismissing the petition challenging it.
Manju Rani v. Shiv Property Dealer and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that when a deceased defendant has no legal representative, the Court should exercise its discretion under Order XXII Rule 4A CPC to appoint a court official to represent the estate, ensuring effective conduct and enforcement of the suit.
Diamond Modular Pvt. Ltd. v. Vikash Kumar & Anr.
Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted permanent injunction protecting the registered 'DIAMOND' trademark against the respondent's use of the deceptively similar 'DIAMOND GOLD' mark for electrical goods.
Jitender Gupta v. Ritu Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over distribution of assets between legal heirs of a deceased partner and the surviving partner after automatic dissolution of the partnership do not constitute commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act.
Punjab and Sind Bank v. Sh Saspal Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the extension of New Pension Scheme benefits to the respondent and directed return of CPF dues with enhancement and interest, dismissing the bank's appeal.
COURTS ON ITS OWN MOTION IN RE: SUICIDE COMMITTED BY SUSHANT ROHILLA v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court mandated constitution of student grievance committees and initiated consultations on mandatory attendance norms in higher education following a student's suicide, directing institutional compliance and further submissions.
Dr. Rakesh Kishore v. Mr. Naresh Saxena & Ors.
Contempt petition against cooperative society officers for illegal entry fees dismissed as barred by limitation and petitioner cannot represent other members; Registrar of Cooperative Societies to adjudicate.
M/S Savita Oil Technologies Limited v. M/S North Eastern Carrying Corporation Limited
The High Court held that objections on limitation and territorial jurisdiction must be framed and tried, not summarily dismissed, and directed the Trial Court to proceed accordingly.
Raj Bala Garg v. Naveen Bhatia & Ors.
The High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to reject a suit for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, holding that averments in the plaint must be accepted as true at the Order VII Rule 11 CPC stage.
Nitin Arora v. Ritu Seth
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant to rely on additional documents regarding the landlady's other properties during arguments on leave to defend in an eviction petition based on bona fide requirement, emphasizing procedural fairness without prejudging merits.
Alcatel Lucent India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr
The Delhi High Court remanded transfer pricing appeals for fresh consideration of comparability of certain companies, emphasizing the need for functional similarity and proper segmental data in determining Arm's Length Price under the Income Tax Act.
Rajnibhai H Doshi v. Mahendra Kumar Narrottam Das Gandhi
The Delhi High Court held it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition under Article 227 challenging NCDRC orders and allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court.
Sushil Kumar Sahdev v. M/S S.K Finance and Leasing Co. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the respondent's Section 8 arbitration application and the petitioner's amendment application within three months, emphasizing party cooperation.
S.B. Enterprises v. Shree Ganesh Steel Traders
The High Court allowed the petitioner to examine an additional witness contrary to an earlier undertaking, subject to conditions and costs, to prevent prejudice and delay in a recovery suit.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Sterlite Power Transmission Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory limitation period for filing a reply under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 cannot be extended, and negligence of counsel does not justify condonation of delay.
Amrit Pal Kaur; Harpreet Kaur; Simarpreet Kaur v. Harcharan Singh Josh
The Delhi High Court upheld a possession decree in favor of a co-owner of leasehold property based on an oral family settlement dividing possession without a formal partition suit.
Roshan Lal Dhanka v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expert re-evaluation of a candidate’s disability to determine eligibility for MBBS admission, emphasizing individualized assessment over categorical exclusion under disability rights law.
St. Stephen's College v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that St. Stephen's College must adhere to the University's fixed seat matrix and admission policies for Christian minority quota seats, affirming that Article 30 rights are subject to reasonable regulations and directed admission of eligible minority students accordingly.
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Samsung Patent License Agreement must be disclosed to defendants' in-house representatives under a confidentiality club, as court-ordered disclosure is permitted under the agreement's confidentiality clause with adequate safeguards.
Interdigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed plaintiffs to file additional documents with expert evidence in a SEP infringement suit, holding that inadvertent omission due to technical glitches constitutes reasonable cause under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC, and admissibility will be tested at trial.