Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Okinawa Autotech International Private Limited & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that interference with a Show Cause Notice is rare and dismissed the appeal challenging the issuance of a blacklisting notice against a company already de-registered under the FAME-II Scheme.
Vinod Mengwal v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s medical categorization affecting promotion eligibility, emphasizing the need for a reasoned order on representation.
Ashok Leyland Ltd v. The Commissioner Value Added Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing refund of Rs. 3.5 crore with interest under the DVAT Act, holding the refund claim was not barred by limitation and the respondent acted arbitrarily in rejecting it.
Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. The Commissioner, Value Added Tax
The Delhi High Court held that delayed refund of excess tax under the DVAT Act mandates payment of interest at the statutory rate from the date refund became due, ordering the respondent to pay interest on the petitioner’s refund amount.
Devadarsini Umapathy v. Medical Counselling Committee
The Delhi High Court held that OCI Cardholders who obtained their cards prior to 04.03.2021 may be considered under both Indian National and Foreign National categories for MBBS admission at AIIMS, dismissing the petition challenging the eligibility criteria and upholding the respondents' clarificatory notification.
Mahesh Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioners' belated representation against recovery of training allowance and stayed recovery pending decision, without expressing opinion on merits.
The Director General All India Radio and Ors. v. Akashvani and Doordarshan Administrative Staff Association
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioners' application and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of recovery of excess pay based on employee undertakings.
M/S. CWHEC-HCIL (JV) v. M/S. CALCUTTA HALDIA PORT ROAD COMPANY LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the decree holder to withdraw execution petitions following settlement, with liberty to re-approach the court and ordered release of deposited documents.
All India Association of Central Excise Gazetted Executive Officers and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The High Court held that the tribunal must consider claims for extension of NFU benefits on merits and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, rejecting dismissal solely on policy grounds.
M/S Innovative Crafts v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing defreezing of the petitioner's bank account, holding that third party payments backed by a tripartite agreement and realized within FEMA timelines entitle the exporter to duty drawback under the Customs Act.
Jiwaji Rao v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the release of family pension to a disabled petitioner, allowing adjustment of excess pension drawn without requiring upfront repayment, emphasizing expeditious relief under Article 226.
Azad Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a service transfer order, holding that vague and unsubstantiated threat perceptions do not justify stalling transfers made in the exigency of service.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. COL (TS) Shyama Nand Jha
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired Colonel, holding that his disabilities were attributable to or aggravated by military service despite occurring during peace tenure.
Asish Mohapatra & Ors. v. Slowform Media Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an ad interim injunction restraining defendants from publishing a defamatory article that went beyond the scope of an FIR, holding that media must ensure accuracy and cannot claim privilege without credible sources and absence of malice.
Parduman Kumar Handa v. Rajan Handa & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for injunction filed by a non-senior citizen over property and vehicles is not barred by Section 27 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, affirming civil court jurisdiction where the Act does not provide an effective remedy.
Ravi Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to an accused under serious charges, holding that mere allegations without material evidence do not justify cancellation of bail.
Ravi Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused, holding that no cogent grounds or material evidence justified revocation of bail under settled legal principles.
Commissioner of Customs (Export), ICD Tughlakabad v. Shri Manish Singhal
The High Court upheld the CESTAT's order setting aside confiscation and penalties for failure to allow cross-examination under Section 138B of the Customs Act, emphasizing procedural fairness in customs adjudications.
Purshottam Chopra v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking further extension of furlough for a life convict, holding that furlough is discretionary and the ground for extension had already been considered and granted.
Vivek Kumar v. Income Tax Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order initiating reassessment proceedings for failure to consider the taxpayer's reply and remanded the matter for a reasoned fresh order, while allowing reassessment proceedings to continue subject to jurisdictional challenges.