Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Anuradha Kapoor & Ors. v. M/S. Prime Time India Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to permit the petitioner to summon the ROC official to prove documents already on record, reserving the question of their admissibility for final arguments.
Anantha Biotechnologies v. B. Venkata Ramanamma
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that challenges to NCDRC orders must be filed in the High Court where the cause of action arose.
Atam Prakash Kaushik thr LRs v. Amit Kumar Khattar
The Delhi High Court held that in a Section 6 Specific Relief Act suit, legal representatives of a deceased defendant cannot belatedly amend pleadings or lead new evidence to raise fresh pleas inconsistent with the original defense, affirming the summary nature of such proceedings focused solely on possession and illegal dispossession.
Shakti Kumar Pawar v. Smt Shashi Gosain
The High Court allowed the defendant time to file an amended written statement strictly in conformity with the limited amendment allowed to the plaint, refusing inconsistent or new pleas.
Deepasri Multispecialities Hospital v. MS Anupama NH
The Delhi High Court directed the NCDRC to reconsider the petitioners' pre-2020 application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement on merits, clarifying that the limitation ruling in New India Assurance applies prospectively.
son of the v. ANAND PRAKASH GOYAL
The Delhi High Court disposed of a tenancy revision petition on the basis of a settlement whereby the tenant agreed to vacate the premises by June 2025 and pay monthly user charges, with the landlord waiving prior claims.
Commissioner of Police and Ors v. Manju Devi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as not pressed by the petitioners, applying the precedent set in Usha Devi v. Union of India.
Punjab National Bank v. Manoj Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that reinstatement with full back wages is not automatic for illegally terminated ad-hoc workers and denied regularization absent due appointment process, awarding monetary compensation instead.
Kiran & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the State Adoption Agency to prioritize a bona fide petitioner couple for adoption of a child adopted from an illegal centre, balancing legal mandates with the child's welfare and humanitarian grounds.
Ramesh Kumar Yadav & Ors. v. Manan Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioners' application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint discloses a cause of action and the issues raised require trial.
Union of India & Ors. v. Raman Kumar Mehta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Union of India, holding that the issue was conclusively settled against them by binding Division Bench precedents.
A. S. Ismail v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court modified the custody parole granted to a senior PFI leader accused under UAPA, denying interim bail but extending parole duration with State-borne expenses to attend his daughter's wedding.
Farman v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that mere reliance on CDR without corroborative evidence is insufficient to deny bail under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act.
Rohit Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity ganja case due to prolonged custody and trial delay, holding that procedural lapses in sampling under the NDPS Act do not automatically vitiate the trial or entitle bail.
Pawan Gupta v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the pre-execution challenge to a COFEPOSA detention order against an absconding Nepalese citizen, holding that delay or non-service abroad does not vitiate the order and directing the petitioner to surrender for execution.
Achla Malhotra v. Delhi State NPEF CGHS Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a money recovery suit as barred by limitation, holding that the limitation period commenced from the date of partial refund and promise to pay the balance, and oral requests cannot extend limitation.
National Highways Authority of India v. Guruvayoor Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld its interim order enforcing arbitral directions requiring the respondent to maintain escrow funds and pay Negative Grant, dismissing modification applications despite the respondent's financial constraints and lenders' objections.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Mahesh Agarwalla & Akshaya Mohapatra
The Delhi High Court held that an accused cannot invoke Section 91 CrPC to seek production of documents at the pre-charge stage, setting aside orders directing CBI to supply interception request letters.
DR GEETANJALI AGGARWAL v. DR MANOJ AGGARWAL
The Delhi High Court Full Bench held that orders under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, though termed interlocutory, are appealable under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, as they affect substantive rights and the welfare of the minor child.
Disruptive Health Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the bank's assignment of an overdraft facility to an ARC after the account was classified as stressed loan under RBI Master Directions, dismissing the appellants' challenge and directing them to seek remedy under the SARFAESI Act.