Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
M/S. Hardicon Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed service tax audit proceedings to continue but restrained enforcement of any final order pending adjudication of the validity of Rule 5A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994.
Ethos Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Department of Trade and Taxes & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to properly consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity for personal hearing.
RR BALAJI AD v. COMMISSIONER OF SGST DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration must be based on objective reasons with prior opportunity to the taxpayer, setting aside a mechanically passed retrospective cancellation order and restoring the petitioner’s registration.
Rajkumar Singhal v. The Goods and Services Tax Network
The Delhi High Court set aside a defective GST Show Cause Notice and related communication for non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements including proper service under Rule 21A of the CGST Act.
G & S International v. Commissioner of Customs; Raj International v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of customs appeals for non-compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement under Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, affirming that the right to appeal is conditional and non-deposit justifies rejection of the appeal.
Usha Rani v. Kanta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in substitution of legal heirs under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC, set aside the abatement of suit, and directed the trial court to proceed with the case.
Bloomberg Television Production Services India Private Limited & Ors. v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining publication of a defamatory article, affirming the trial court's discretionary order after applying the triple test and procedural safeguards.
Kailash Aggarwal v. Ashwani Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for consultancy fees under a contingent contract is not premature merely due to an unfulfilled condition on a cheque, but preliminary issues require trial evidence and cannot be decided on an Order VII Rule 11 CPC application alone.
Surinder Kumar Pawan Kumar v. Shri Laxman Das Dhanwaria
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that summons were duly served by deemed service despite tenant's claims of non-service and that failure to file leave to contest justified eviction.
Manoj v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted furlough to a life convict with a satisfactory jail record despite prior parole violations, emphasizing corrective objectives and imposing strict conditions.
State v. Raja Ram
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual assault case due to failure to prove the victim's minority and inconsistencies in prosecution evidence.
Ravinder Kumar @ Ravi and Ors. v. The State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Narender Kumar & Anr. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Seagull Maritime Agencies Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders passed without proper service and hearing, remanding the matter for re-adjudication in accordance with natural justice principles.
Deepali Panwar & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 506, 509, 323, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Naresh Arya v. Savitri Kukreja
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discretionary order directing interim compensation under Section 143A NI Act where the petitioner admitted issuance of dishonoured cheques and execution of sale deed, finding no ground for interference.
Shree Girirajji and Co. v. Gagan Pagrani Proprietor of Plastica Industries
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of the Commercial Court over a trademark infringement suit involving sales through an interactive website accessible in Delhi, dismissing the appellant’s challenge to the injunction and jurisdiction.
M/S MAGNUM RESOURCES PVT LTD v. M/S INDIA SEWING MACHINE COMPANY & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing the respondents to summon additional witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C in a cheque dishonor case, emphasizing the discretionary power to ensure justice.
Bala Devi & Ors. v. Hukum Chand
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an ex-parte order awarding earned wages under the Shops & Establishment Act, holding that non-appearance and unrebutted evidence justified the Authority's decision.
Shahid v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for theft under Sections 379/34 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already undergone by the petitioner, considering the nature of the offence and jail conduct.