Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Bikanervala Foods Pvt Ltd v. M/S. Namaste Foods & Ors.

14 Mar 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2310

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a substitute Arbitrator following the death of the sole Arbitrator, affirming the Court's jurisdiction under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to ensure continuation of arbitration proceedings.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 15 Substitute Arbitrator Death of Arbitrator

Amrit Pal Singh Gambhir v. Inderjeet Singh Gambhir & Ors.

14 Mar 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2229

The Delhi High Court allowed Defendant No.2’s application to amend the Written Statement at the initial stage to incorporate estoppel plea and other facts, emphasizing no prejudice and timely completion of pleadings.

civil other amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC Section 151 CPC estoppel

Praveen Jain v. Financial Commissioner and Others

14 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2119
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking restitution of possession over disputed land, holding that writ jurisdiction is not available for disputed factual issues and parties must approach civil courts for resolution.

property petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 writ jurisdiction disputed questions of fact

Akash Solanki & Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

14 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2117

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging recruitment of additional contractual Cath Lab Technicians, holding that replacement without regular selection was not established as the new posts were additional.

constitutional petition_dismissed contractual employees replacement regular selection writ petition

Kirpal Singh v. Guru Harkrishan Public School and Ors.

14 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2121

Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to terminal benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC and directed payment with interest, rejecting respondents' contention of withholding benefits.

labor petition_allowed Significant terminal benefits 6th Central Pay Commission 7th Central Pay Commission unaided minority schools

Bijender Singh Lather v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

14 Mar 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2277

The Delhi High Court set aside coercive proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. against accused who joined investigation post chargesheet, while upholding proclamation against the accused who evaded investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 82 Cr.P.C. Non-Bailable Warrants chargesheet proclaimed offender

DR GHANSHYAM CHOURASIYA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

14 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2122

The Delhi High Court directed the government to consider the petitioner's claim for last increment and retirement benefits in light of binding Supreme Court rulings and dispose of it within six weeks.

administrative other Significant writ petition Article 226 last increment retirement benefits

Sushila Vel v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.

14 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2118

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition on pay anomaly and seniority by directing the Competent Authority to consider the petitioner's representation within six weeks after hearing her.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 pay anomaly seniority list

M/s Lumax Auto Pvt Ltd v. Official Liquidator

14 Mar 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2207

The Delhi High Court dissolved M/s Lumax Auto Pvt. Ltd. under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 and discharged the Official Liquidator as winding up could not proceed due to lack of assets.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Companies Act 1956 Section 481 company dissolution winding up

Ashok Mehra v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors

14 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2120

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a rejected alternate plot allotment application after finding the Recommendation Committee failed to properly consider official acquisition records and the petitioner’s representation.

administrative other Significant Land Acquisition Policy Alternate plot allotment Recommendation Committee Tehsildar report

M/S Supreme Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax North Delhi

14 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2242-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires objective reasons and proper notice, and modified the cancellation date to the actual business closure date.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act Show Cause Notice

Three Ess Industries v. Commissioner of VAT and Anr.

14 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2218-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to consider and decide the petitioner’s claim for statutory interest on delayed VAT refund under Section 42 of the DVAT Act, mandating payment or a reasoned order.

tax petition_allowed Delhi Value Added Tax Act Section 42 refund statutory interest

Delhi Development Authority and Anr. v. Surjit Singh and Anr.

14 Mar 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:2051-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing DDA to reckon the respondent's past MES service for pension and ACP benefits despite procedural formalities and an earlier undertaking.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant past service benefits pension ACP scheme technical resignation

State v. Rohit

14 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2067

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case due to failure of prosecution to prove the victim's minority and inconsistencies in her statements.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant minor age proof sexual offence POCSO Act Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement

Bihar State Backward Classes Finance and Development Corporation v. National Backward Classes Finance and Development Corporation & Anr.

14 Mar 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:2104

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral Award due to unilateral appointment of the Arbitrator without express written consent and lack of valid consent to the settlement, reaffirming strict compliance with Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unilateral appointment arbitrator disqualification Section 12(5) Arbitration Act waiver of objection

Commissioner of Police v. Meena Kumari

14 Mar 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:2070-DB

The High Court remanded dismissal without departmental enquiry under Article 311(2)(b) for fresh consideration, emphasizing the need for objective reasons and judicial scrutiny before dispensing with enquiry.

administrative other Significant Article 311(2)(b) departmental enquiry dismissal without enquiry judicial review

Chandani v. State (NCT of Delhi)

14 Mar 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2112-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a major daughter living voluntarily with her husband cannot be compelled to return to her parents via habeas corpus petition.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ of habeas corpus majority personal liberty right to choose residence

Currymia Foods Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Mar 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2108

The Delhi High Court held that a company succeeding a sole proprietorship contractor must obtain fresh registration to supply meat to the Army, upholding removal of the predecessor for failure to notify change.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant successor-in-interest registration of contractors government procurement amalgamation

Gaurav Kumar v. Nirmal Singh & Ors

14 Mar 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2029
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that the appellant failed to prove rash and negligent driving by the truck driver and that the accident was caused due to the tractor trolley losing control, with contributory negligence by the appellant.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 rash and negligent driving res ipsa loquitur

JAI OPTICAL v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

14 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2246-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of personal hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant CGST Act 2017 Section 73 Show Cause Notice Input Tax Credit