Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Employees State Insurance Corporation v. Anil Katyal & Ors.

18 Mar 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2354-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of ESIC's seniority lists for Social Security Officers, directing their redrawing in line with the Supreme Court's ruling in K. Meghachandra Singh that seniority attaches only after completion of recruitment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant seniority list direct recruits limited departmental competitive examination K. Meghachandra Singh

Vishal Swara & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

18 Mar 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2177

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a civil-commercial dispute following an amicable settlement, directing residual disputes to arbitration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR civil dispute settlement agreement

Mamta Verma v. Sonmati Verma & Ors.

18 Mar 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:2142

The Delhi High Court expunged derogatory remarks against the petitioner's advocate from a trial court order and waived imposed costs, emphasizing that judicial orders must avoid irrelevant personal criticisms.

civil petition_allowed Significant judicial remarks professional competence of advocate expungement of judicial order derogatory observations

Pavni Alagh v. Central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.

18 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2539

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing a female private candidate to appear in remaining Class XII board exams despite submitting the Domicile Certificate after the CBSE's cut-off date, holding that arbitrary administrative deadlines without statutory basis cannot bar examination rights.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Domicile Certificate CBSE Board Examinations Private Candidate

GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED v. M/S ANDHRA PRADESH GAS POWER CORPORATION LTD

18 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5703

The Delhi High Court held that payment of correct stamp duty suffices to treat an arbitral award as properly stamped without prior Collector adjudication and allowed enforcement proceedings despite a pending challenge petition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award stamp duty Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Section 31(1)

Manish Kumar Singh; Sgt. Mritunjay; Sgt. Pankaj Sharma v. Ex JWO Dharmendra Prasad

18 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2740-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Coronary Artery Disease, emphasizing the burden on the military to prove non-attributability and the necessity of reasoned decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Coronary Artery Disease military service Release Medical Board

Union of India v. 617797 HFO MWO Raj Bhanu Singh MTD Retd

18 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3058-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II and Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces tribunal Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Primary Hypertension

Union of India & Ors. v. GP Capt Santosh Kumar Tripathi Retd

18 Mar 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3057-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Diabetes Mellitus Type-II Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Dr. Huma Baqa & Ors. v. University of Delhi & Ors.

15 Mar 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:2081
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions by ad hoc Assistant Professors challenging their non-regularization and the University’s selection process, affirming that ad hoc employment does not confer a right to permanent appointment without employer assurance and that courts should not interfere absent clear illegality.

labor petition_dismissed Significant regularization ad hoc employment legitimate expectation selection process

Vikash Kumar v. NTPC Limited & Ors.

15 Mar 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:2332
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of an NTPC employee following fair disciplinary proceedings, affirming limited judicial review over departmental inquiries and emphasizing adherence to natural justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings natural justice judicial review writ petition

Shailly Upadhyay v. Union of India and Ors.

15 Mar 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:2197-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the medical boards' decisions declaring the petitioner medically unfit for recruitment, emphasizing limited judicial interference in expert medical fitness determinations under recruitment guidelines.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical fitness recruitment armed forces paramilitary forces

Amit Kumar & Ors. v. State & Ors.

15 Mar 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2095

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 323, 341, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement abuse of process

Technical Construction Company v. Engineering Project (India) Limited

15 Mar 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2130
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an express written acknowledgment of liability restarts the limitation period for filing a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, allowing appointment of an arbitrator despite delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Limitation Act, 1963 Section 18 acknowledgment

Akshat Baldwa & Ors. v. Yash Raj Films & Ors.

15 Mar 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2417

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional and statutory right of persons with disabilities to accessible audio-visual content, directing the government to notify mandatory accessibility guidelines and ensuring interim measures for inclusion of audio description and captions in films.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant accessibility persons with disabilities audio description subtitling

Asit Mukherjee v. State

15 Mar 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:2163

The Delhi High Court set aside charges under Sections 354A and 509 IPC against the petitioner, holding no prima facie case was made out and discharging him to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant charge framing Section 354A IPC Section 509 IPC prima facie case

M/S APEX BUILDSYS LIMITED v. IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED

15 Mar 2024 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2024:DHC:2113
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator, holding that procedural objections and delay in invoking arbitration are to be decided by the arbitrator, and invalid appointment procedures violating neutrality principles are severable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 21 Appointment of arbitrator

Ramesh Chandra v. Directorate of Enforcement

15 Mar 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2080
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court extended interim bail on medical grounds to an elderly accused in a PMLA case, holding that bail is justified only if the medical condition is serious and not treatable in jail, with directions for adequate medical care in custody.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim bail medical grounds Section 482 CrPC Section 45 PMLA

Sakshi v. Jawaharlal Nehru University Through Its Registrar & Anr.

15 Mar 2024 · Sachin Datta, J. · 2024:DHC:2170

The Delhi High Court directed election grievances in JNU Students Union polls to a Grievance Redressal Cell and appointed an observer, refusing to quash the election process despite procedural challenges.

administrative other Significant Election Committee Students Union Elections Jawaharlal Nehru University Grievance Redressal Cell

Harish Yadav v. Union of India

15 Mar 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:2065-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an OBC certificate issued by a State authority based on a certificate from another State does not qualify for reservation in the domicile State, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for appointment under the OBC category.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant OBC certificate domicile certificate reservation competent authority

MS UNISSI INDIA PVT LTD v. MS HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION CO

15 Mar 2024 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2024:DHC:2086

The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction over a contract dispute lies in Mumbai where the contract was made and performed, and thus returned the plaint for filing in Mumbai courts.

civil other Significant territorial jurisdiction cause of action contract performance Section 20 CPC