Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
NTPC Limited v. M/S Surya Day Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the reduction of a three-year ban on a bidder by NTPC to the period already served, emphasizing proportionality and rejecting the characterization of fraudulent conduct.
Mohd Arshad & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Ranbir Singh Yadav v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's dismissal of a pension claim where the petitioner consumed his CPF corpus and failed to opt for pension in writing, holding he was not entitled to pension benefits.
SH YOGESH KUMAR v. SH RAJESH KUMAR & ORS
The Delhi High Court rejected the counter-claim challenging property ownership and mutation on grounds of res judicata and limitation, affirming the finality of earlier adjudication.
Satish Kumar & Anr. v. The Tehsildar and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that post urbanization under Section 507A DMC Act, land demarcation jurisdiction shifts from Revenue Authorities to the DDA and directed the DDA to consider the petitioners' representation for demarcation with all relevant records.
Raju @ Raju Rajput & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and resumption of cohabitation between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Raj Kumar Jajodia v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over alleged encroachment on Reserve Forest Land must be decided by the Deputy Conservator of Forests and stayed coercive action pending such decision.
Mr. Hreesh Kenth & Anr. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a notarized Will executed in the UK in favour of the petitioners as executors and beneficiaries, relying on uncontested no objection affidavits from all legal heirs.
Manoj Khera & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Saurabh Kashyap v. Sunil Goswami
The Delhi High Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act against an individual authorized signatory, holding that the company drawer must be impleaded and served notice for prosecution to be maintainable.
Link Engineers (P) Limited v. Bielomatik Leuze GmbH + Co. KG
The Delhi High Court held that a subsequent suit based on a distinct cause of action arising from a settlement during the pendency of an earlier suit is not barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC.
Aditya Birla Finance Ltd. v. Anjali Nag and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to appoint a Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration Act, holding that arbitration proceedings can coexist with SARFAESI enforcement proceedings when the petitioner is not notified under the RDB Act.
Adept Power Pvt Ltd v. Beaux Arts Construction Services Company
The Delhi High Court held that Section 29A time limits do not apply to arbitration proceedings initiated before the 2015 amendment and dismissed the petition seeking termination of the arbitral tribunal's mandate.
Smt Phoolwati (Deceased) through LRs and Ors. v. Shri Devinder Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interlocutory order refusing summary judgment on oral partition, holding such orders are not appealable and directing the parties to proceed with trial.
Akhilesh Kumar Gupta v. Ms. Gupta Snizhana Grygorivna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s dismissal of a guardianship petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, affirming that custody jurisdiction lies where the minor ordinarily resides and a parent cannot benefit from unlawfully removing the child from a foreign country.
R8 SPACE DESIGN PVT LTD. v. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER STATE TAX DELHI & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction, cogent reasons, and proper notice, and modified the cancellation date to the date of the Show Cause Notice.
Devender Singh Rawat v. M/S Vian Infrastructure Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to produce additional original documents to substantiate his land ownership claim in liquidation proceedings, setting aside the earlier order rejecting his claim.
M/S VEETRAG TRADERS v. THE COMMISIIONER OF SGST DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and opportunity to the taxpayer, modifying the cancellation date to the petitioner's application date.
Jagbir Singh @ Tony v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed furlough to a life convict who had absconded during earlier parole but subsequently maintained good conduct, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of furlough under prison rules.
Niraj Kumar v. Common University Entrance Test through its Directors & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of an erroneously entered subject code in an LLM entrance exam application by directing issuance of a revised admit card, disposing of the writ petition as withdrawn.