Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Shankar Kumar v. Ancy Alphonso
The High Court allowed the revision petition to permit the petitioner to file a delayed reply in a maintenance proceeding under Section 125 Cr.P.C., imposing costs for the delay.
Bejon Kumar Misra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking 100% deposit insurance and protective measures for PMC Bank depositors, holding that prior judgments and statutory measures render the petition infructuous and that policy matters lie beyond judicial intervention.
M/s Sachdeva Enterprises v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that the presumption of liability was rebutted due to lack of documentation and contradictory evidence.
Devender Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of multiple cheque bounce offences under Section 147 NI Act after conviction, directing payment of reduced costs and ordering the petitioner's release.
Devender Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of cheque bounce offences under Section 147 NI Act after settlement, directed payment of reduced costs, and ordered the petitioner's release, treating compounding as acquittal under Section 320(8) CrPC.
MS. Renu Kumari (Khanna) v. Sh. Ravi Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an ad-interim order in a property dispute, clarifying that restraint orders bind only parties and directing expeditious disposal of pending interlocutory applications.
Daljeet Singh Saini v. The State and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to recall the complainant for further cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, holding that such power must be exercised sparingly and not on vague grounds like change of counsel.
Aakash Educational Services Ltd v. Parvesh Kumar Dhiman
The Delhi High Court held that a unilateral arbitrator appointment clause is unenforceable and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve the dispute.
Aakash Educational Services Limited v. Vivek Srivastava
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of an arbitrator is impermissible and directed reference of employment disputes to arbitration under DIAC with a neutral arbitrator appointed by the institution.
Sumita Rastogi v. Gaurav Rastogi
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a family law case to consolidate interconnected proceedings before one court to ensure expeditious justice.
M/S Hotline Fashion India Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S Sentinel Consultants Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a transferee pendente lite challenging execution of a decree for possession of a basement, holding that such a transferee cannot resist execution under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC and Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act.
M/S Chehak Fashions v. Commissioner, Delhi GST
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, modifying the cancellation date to the Show Cause Notice date and allowing the petition.
Vishal Banga v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of probate for NRE fixed deposits under a Will, holding that the condition of maintaining bank guarantees ceased upon loan repayment, validating the bequest to the beneficiary.
Sandeep Pawar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court denied interim bail on medical grounds but directed the accused to be admitted to AIIMS for specialized treatment under custody, balancing his health rights with the gravity of the offence.
M/S COSMOS INFRABUILD PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S KALYAN JEWELLERS INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court upheld the injunction restraining the lessor from interfering with the lessee's possession, holding that the security deposit must be refunded subject only to specified deductions before possession can be handed over.
GSK Consumer Healthcare S.A. v. Celebrity Biopharma Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the trademark “OTRINIR” for being deceptively similar to GSK’s prior registered marks “OTRIVIN” and “OTRINOZ”, affirming the petitioner’s exclusive rights and rejecting the respondent’s claim of genericness.
Union of India v. M/S PNSC Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal against the dismissal of a delayed Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, holding that the limitation period restarts upon return of the petition and delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.
Union of India v. M/S. Tech Mahindra Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the award did not suffer from patent illegality and the arbitrator's contract interpretation and factual findings were justified.
MUFG Bank Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax 2 & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, an assessee can settle individual appeals independently without settling all appeals for the same assessment year.
MUFG BANK LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, a taxpayer can settle one or more disputes arising from an assessment year without settling all pending appeals or petitions.