Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

E5 Infrastructure Private Limited v. National Highways Authority of India

28 Mar 2024 · Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:2543-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against debarment of a contractor implicated in a murder case, holding that writ relief under Article 226 is barred due to blameworthy conduct and availability of alternative contractual remedies.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India writ petition maintainability blameworthy conduct alternative remedy

Dr. Tabassum Saifi v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Mar 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2423

Anticipatory bail was denied to a BUMS doctor accused of impersonating an MBBS doctor and forging documents, as the court held that serious allegations of impersonation and forgery require thorough investigation beyond mere medical negligence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail impersonation forgery medical negligence

Kulwant Singh v. Vikas Ahuja

28 Mar 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:2445

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order where the tenant failed to file an application for leave to contest despite valid service of summons in the prescribed format under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) eviction service of summons

Banadik v. State

28 Mar 2024 · Navin Chawla

The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a murder conspiracy case, holding that call data records alone do not preclude bail and prolonged pre-trial detention without charges violates the right to liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail call data records conspiracy pre-trial custody

Promila Anand v. Guru Nanak Public School & Anr.

27 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2656

The Delhi High Court quashed the suspension order against the petitioner for non-compliance with statutory procedural requirements and lack of material evidence of embezzlement.

administrative petition_allowed Significant writ petition suspension order Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 8

Hena Dutta v. The Director of Education and Ors.

27 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2511

Delhi High Court held that a retired teacher entitled to automatic re-employment must receive arrears of salary and benefits from the date of the binding court order directing re-employment, despite not working during the interim period.

administrative petition_allowed Significant automatic re-employment writ petition no work no pay arrears of salary

Ashok Chandra v. Government of NCT of Delhi

27 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2504

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of a long-pending appeal under the Delhi Land Reforms Act following urbanization of the land, emphasizing timely justice and adherence to natural justice principles.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 urbanization Article 226

Garg Builders v. Hindustan Prefab Limited & Anr.

27 Mar 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:3069

The Delhi High Court held that failure of a designated authority to appoint an arbitrator with required consent does not bar arbitration and the court can appoint an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Conditional arbitration clause

Rubinder Kaur v. Guru Nanak Public School & Anr.

27 Mar 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2657

The Delhi High Court quashed a suspension order issued without prior approval of the Director of Education, holding such suspension invalid under Section 8(4) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973.

administrative petition_allowed Significant suspension Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Section 8(4) prior approval

Sh. Sat Narain and Anr v. Nalanda Modern Public School and Ors

27 Mar 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:2419

The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's order permitting installation of an iron gate on a disputed common passage, emphasizing adherence to the existing status quo order and proper exercise of interim relief powers under Section 151 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant status quo order Section 151 CPC Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC interim relief

Mohd Shakeel @ Shakeel Ahmed v. Sabia Begum & Ors.

27 Mar 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2452

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging execution orders for maintenance arrears, affirming strict enforcement of final maintenance orders under Section 125 Cr.P.C.

family appeal_dismissed maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. execution petition arrears

ICICI Bank Ltd v. Anirudh Chauhan

27 Mar 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:2413

The Delhi High Court held that in commercial suits, courts cannot condone delay in filing written statements beyond 120 days from summons service, setting aside the order that allowed such condonation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay written statement Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015

Union of India v. M/S Sanoj Kumar Modi

27 Mar 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:2482-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act starts from receipt of the award and internal delays cannot extend limitation, dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act limitation period condonation of delay arbitral award

Baljeet Singh @ Aman v. State

27 Mar 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:2483
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a Charge Sheet filed within the statutory period without the FSL report is not incomplete and does not entitle the accused to default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant default bail Charge Sheet FSL report Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.

Priyanka Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi

27 Mar 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:2602

The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate’s refusal to register an FIR in a property dispute, holding that police investigation is not mandatory when the complainant possesses all relevant documents and the matter can be inquired into by the Court.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. FIR registration Police investigation Section 200 Cr.P.C.

M/S T.G. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. v. M/S Agarwal Agencies Pvt. Ltd.

27 Mar 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:2603
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging cheating in a real estate transaction, holding that mere breach of contract without dishonest intention does not constitute an offence under Section 420 IPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 420 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of criminal complaint breach of contract vs cheating

A v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 Mar 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2567

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail, holding that vague and unsubstantiated allegations do not warrant revocation of bail without cogent evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail cancellation of bail Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Devender Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 Mar 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2435

The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of cheque bounce offences after conviction based on a settlement, directing payment of reduced cost and ordering the petitioner's release.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Compounding of offences Section 147 NI Act

Harjit Singh Kent v. Shri Balbir Singh Kainth

27 Mar 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:2545-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking re-opening of defendant’s evidence after it was closed by proxy counsel, holding that delay and lack of relevance do not justify reopening evidence in civil proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed re-opening evidence civil procedure Section 151 CPC Letters Patent appeal

M A Suresh v. State of NCT of Delhi

27 Mar 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2442

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against the petitioner, holding that at the charge framing stage, the court must only determine if a prima facie case exists without delving into defence or conducting a mini trial.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant framing of charges prima facie case Section 408 IPC Section 409 IPC