Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Avadh Kaushik v. Anant Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking enforcement of slip road construction, holding that it will not interfere with the expert administrative decision to adopt a comprehensive traffic decongestion plan.
Director General of Works (CPWD) v. Laljeet Yadav and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award reinstating contract labourers as employees with 50% back wages for illegal termination without notice under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act.
Maya Ram Semwal v. Hotel Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition for non-compliance with a 2008 order as barred by the one-year limitation period under Section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Rahul Sachdeva Sole Proprietor, M/S V.K. Pipe Traders
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause in tax invoices is binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while directing ongoing mediation before arbitration proceedings.
Kiran D. Patki & Anr. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside probate granted on a Will containing uncountered alterations and directed payments from the estate while emphasizing the necessity to examine all attesting witnesses to establish a Will's authenticity.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Sanjeev Sehgal Proprietor of M/s. Radiant Industries
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause contained in tax invoices is binding and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate payment disputes, directing mediation before arbitration proceeds.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Shree Chaitnya Industries
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause in tax invoices is binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, while allowing mediation to continue.
Swastik Pipe Ltd v. Mr. Rohit Sharma Sole Proprietor, M/s. Star Industries
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in tax invoices are binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes, while also referring the matter to mediation.
Sh Adesh Jain & Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed eviction orders issued under the East Punjab Holdings Act over land within the Extended Lal Dora area, holding that revenue authorities lack jurisdiction and the Civil Court has exclusive jurisdiction to decide title and possession disputes.
Swastik Pipe Ltd. v. Sachinav Arora Proprietor of Roohani Engg Works
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration clauses in tax invoices are binding and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes between the parties.
Jaipali v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of family pension for a disabled petitioner upon affidavit of non-employment, emphasizing sympathetic treatment under disability law and procedural fairness.
Sharad Nagre v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused of orchestrating a large-scale cheque forgery and fraud, emphasizing the strict approach required for economic offences and rejecting parity with co-accused granted bail.
Karan Dua v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking directions on record maintenance, reduction of conversion charges, and stay of eviction notices in JJ Colonies, holding the petition motivated and lacking merit.
M/S NHPC LIMITED v. M/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award allowing rate revisions under contract clauses, holding the tribunal’s interpretation plausible and not warranting judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rohitash Mahur and Others v. The State and Another
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Sh. Anuj Malhotra v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest petition seeking a ban on cross-gender massages in spas, holding that the issue is already sub judice before a Single Judge and the petition is not maintainable.
Gautam v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
Nikhil Pandit & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Parijat Sarkar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 323 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
STCI Finance Ltd. v. Sukhmani Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside a 'Nil Award' in a loan recovery arbitration, holding that invocation of pledged shares does not constitute an actual sale under the Contract Act, preserving the pledgor's redemption rights until sale to a third party.