Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Haldiram India Pvt. Ltd. v. Berachah Sales Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declared 'HALDIRAM' a well-known trademark, granted permanent injunction against defendants' infringing use, and awarded damages for trademark infringement and passing off.
Yogesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted bail and suspended sentence of a convicted appellant in a POCSO case pending appeal, citing material contradictions, unexplained FIR delay, and incomplete investigation without expressing final opinion on merits.
Gupta v. Ekta Kapur
The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal granting divorce on the ground of mental and physical cruelty by the wife under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, setting aside the Family Court's dismissal.
Suman Kumar Bhan v. Durga Bhan Nee Haifz
The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal seeking divorce on grounds of cruelty and desertion, holding that he failed to prove the respondent wife's cruelty or desertion, and that his own conduct amounted to cruelty compelling her to leave.
State v. Virender @ Billu & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused for gang rape under Section 376G IPC due to unreliable prosecutrix testimony and insufficient corroborative evidence.
State v. Afroz @ Sharib & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in an acid attack case due to contradictions and investigative deficiencies but directed victim compensation and rehabilitation.
Anupam Trivedi v. Ram Singh Rathwa and Another
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for non-compliance with an order that did not expressly permit the petitioner to continue in TRIFED, holding that the Chairman lacked authority to override the Ministry’s repatriation order.
Sunil Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a jail superintendent accused of facilitating an organized crime syndicate operating from inside Rohini Jail, holding that the stringent conditions under Section 21(4) of MCOCA were not met.
Maple ODC Movers Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, directing re-adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity to respond.
M/S A. B TRADERS v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST demand order for failing to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with proper examination and hearing.
Canara Bank v. Assistant Commissioner, DGST
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity for hearing.
KAILASH INTERNATIONAL v. COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICE TAX & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication after affording opportunity of personal hearing.
Bona Vita Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. The Sales Tax Officer Class-II Avato Ward 94 Zone 8 New Delhi 110002
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for non-consideration of the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity to be heard.
Manpowergroup Services India Pvt Ltd v. The Sales Tax Officer Class-II Ward-I Zone-I Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to respond to show cause notices alleging irregular input tax credit with procedural safeguards, without adjudicating merits.
Safe Fly Aviation Services Private Limited v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication after providing an opportunity of personal hearing.
CHARU OVERSEAS PVT. LTD. v. THE UNION OF INDIA REVENUE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication after providing an opportunity of hearing.
Kamlesh Sharma v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition under the 1894 Act does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is taken and compensation paid, and a subsequent purchaser cannot challenge such acquisition.
Sirajuddin Qureshi v. Matloob Ahmad and Others
The Delhi High Court held that the General Body of a society has the exclusive right to amend its Memorandum of Association and to requisition meetings, quashing the restraint on holding the Special General Body Meeting and setting aside directions for financial audit.
Dr. Vikas Gupta v. Dr. Rajni Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of mental cruelty and desertion, emphasizing the cumulative effect of repeated separations and abandonment over 19 years of marriage.
Atul Punj v. IDBI Bank & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under RBI Master Directions, fraud classification in multiple banking requires consortium consensus and full disclosure of forensic audit reports to the borrower, directing IDBI Bank to furnish complete reports and reconsider its proceedings against the petitioner.