Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
PACE SETTERS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of reverse charge tax provisions and denial of input tax credit to recovery agent service providers, dismissing the challenge under Article 14 of the Constitution.
Rakesh Chandra Saxena v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking habeas corpus for Ashish Saxena, holding his detention under a valid Look Out Circular lawful and proper procedures followed.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central-1 v. Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi High Court held that the 2017 Finance Act's extended limitation period for reopening income tax assessments applies prospectively and does not revive assessments barred before its commencement, while upholding reopening within permissible periods under Section 153C.
Mypreferred Transformation and Hospitality Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the condonable delay period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act is not extended by Section 10 of the General Clauses Act when it expires during court vacation, dismissing the appeal against rejection of condonation application.
Delhi Development Authority v. Roshanara Club Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld interim protection to Roshanara Club against eviction pending final adjudication, directing consideration of a management scheme and lease renewal policy by DDA.
MMTC Ltd v. L.C. Madan
The Delhi High Court held that arbitration proceedings abate and rights extinguish if the claimant fails to timely implead legal representatives of a deceased party under Order XXII CPC and Limitation Act, dismissing MMTC Ltd.'s petition for appointment of an arbitrator.
Ravinder Kumar v. M/S Gigantic Impex Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that suits challenging registered sale deeds on grounds of unpaid consideration and retention of possession are maintainable and cannot be summarily dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial to determine parties' intention.
Prof Dr. Mohan Rao & Ors. v. Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Non-Practicing Allowance cannot be withdrawn or recovered from MBBS-qualified university faculty without valid rescission of the Executive Council Resolution granting it, quashing the stoppage and recovery demand by JNU.
Raj Kumar Verma & Ors. v. Late Nanak Chand Thr Lrs
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on the landlord's bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the limited scope of revision under Section 25B(8).
Gannon Dunkerley and Company Limited v. Union of India Ministry of Road Transport and Highways
The Delhi High Court held that filing writ petitions challenging contract termination does not waive the right to arbitration and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving all jurisdictional and merit issues to the arbitral tribunal.
M/S RG REFINERIES PVT. LTD. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GROUP III), NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court quashed the denial of duty-free tariff preference due to non-consideration of updated certificates of origin and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
M S Abhay Traders v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Another
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration under Section 29(2) CGST Act must be based on objective satisfaction with proper reasons and opportunity, modifying cancellation to the date of proprietor's death instead of an earlier retrospective date.
Rajat Kapoor v. Commissioner, State Tax, GST, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and proper notice, modifying the cancellation date to the proprietor's death date instead of an arbitrary earlier date.
M/S D S S BUILDTECH PVT LTD v. MANOJ KAYAL
The Delhi High Court set aside the NCDRC's order directing 100% deposit for stay, holding that only 50% or Rs. 35,000 deposit is permissible under Section 19 of the Consumer Protection Act and remanded the matter for reconsideration.
Dr Shashi Bhushan v. University of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a vacancy arising from resignation after appointment is a fresh vacancy requiring fresh advertisement and cannot be filled from the waiting list.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Promila Prabhakar
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation based on UK minimum wages for a British national deceased in a motor accident, holding the registered owner and insurer jointly liable despite unregistered vehicle transfer and rejected insurer's plea of non-liability due to permit and policy transfer issues.
Shiv Raj Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of accused in a criminal case involving alleged forged transfer of company shares, holding that the trial court must consider the chargesheet and investigation material rather than relying solely on NCLT orders at the charge framing stage.
Guriqbal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that upgraded below benchmark ACRs must be considered retrospectively for promotion and seniority restoration, quashing the denial based on a DoP&T OM applicable only prospectively.
Aney Pal Singh v. Ashok Kumar Kholi
The Delhi High Court set aside dismissal of eviction petitions under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that lease expiry alone does not bar eviction if no dispossession steps were taken, and remanded for fresh adjudication.
Chanpreet Singh Bammi v. Sukhmani Kaur Oberoi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the respondent for non-compliance with a family court order that was subsequently modified and no longer subsisted, holding that contempt requires willful disobedience of a subsisting order.