Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Shishpal Singh v. Govt. of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of land reform proceedings post urbanization notification is legally ineffective and permitted the petitioner to seek civil remedies.
Megha Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the termination of the petitioner’s consultancy contract by EdCIL was non-stigmatic and did not restrict her from seeking future employment in government or private sectors.
Ravi and Singh Communication v. Sify Technologies Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant's application to amend its Written Statement based on final forensic audit findings, holding that such amendments are permissible if they do not alter the defence's nature or prejudice the plaintiff.
Shyam Singh and Another v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash attempt to murder proceedings under Section 307 IPC despite settlement and compensation, emphasizing the serious societal impact of such offences and limited scope of quashing powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Md. Adil v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused in an acid attack case under section 326A IPC after considering the nature of injury, forensic evidence, stage of trial, and prolonged custody, subject to stringent conditions.
M/S OM SHYAM TRADERS AND OTHERS v. SMFG INDIA CREDIT COMPANY LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging recovery proceedings under SARFAESI Act, vacated interim stay on auction of mortgaged property, and directed repayment within four weeks or else allowed auction.
Tobias Christian v. Narcotic Control Bureau
Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused of possessing intermediate quantity of heroin under NDPS Act, holding that non-filing of FSL report does not entitle default bail and Section 50 NDPS Act is inapplicable when recovery is from accused directly.
Md. Adil v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a rape case after considering the prosecutrix's delayed complaint, contradictions, and the stage of trial, emphasizing the need for credible evidence and reasonable custodial detention.
Gagan Gupta & Ors. v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.
Ravinder Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for condonation of a 1277-day delay in filing a restoration application, holding that no sufficient cause was shown to justify the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Sh. Manish Soni and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 506 and 509 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Lokesh Sharma @ Sonu v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail to the applicant, holding he is not a relative of the deceased's husband and thus not liable under Sections 498A and 304B IPC, with custodial interrogation deemed unnecessary.
Dhruv @ Laddu v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to young accused in a grievous injury case, emphasizing the need to balance the gravity of offence with prolonged pre-trial detention and imposing conditions to safeguard trial integrity.
Mahboob Khan v. State Through SHO Chhawla
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the applicant accused of aiding kidnapping and sexual offences, emphasizing parity with co-accused bail and absence of risk to witnesses or trial.
I S v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 376 IPC after the parties solemnized marriage during investigation, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
M/S Jai Durga Industries v. Phool Chand Bhagat Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking reopening of cross-examination in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, holding that repeated adjournments and delay justified closure of cross-examination to uphold the summary nature of proceedings.
Manish Soni and Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Birender @ Beeru@Veerpal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the Court's process.
Alok Jolly and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Alok Singhal v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354B, 506, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.