Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Union of India & Ors. v. Amit Kumar Yadav

05 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 8234
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting certiorari review to legal errors only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Vandana Rana v. Manjeet Singh

04 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2162

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial dispute case from Saket Courts to Dwarka Family Courts to ensure impartiality and consolidate related proceedings.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition matrimonial dispute family courts domestic violence

Ram Milan Yadav Gulba Devi Private ITI v. Directorate General of Training

04 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2503

The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate General of Training to inspect the petitioner’s institution and decide the affiliation application within a specified timeframe, addressing undue administrative delay.

administrative petition_allowed writ of mandamus affiliation inspection administrative delay

M/S JAIN CEMENT UDYOG v. CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS

04 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2750-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order passed without hearing the petitioner who was unable to respond due to retrospective cancellation of GST registration, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice ex-parte order

Archit Khandelwal Proprietor M/s Archit Enterprises v. Pr. Commissioner of DGST Delhi

04 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2816-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and due process, modifying the cancellation date to when the petitioner ceased business.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act natural justice

M/S DEEP PLASTIC GRANULES TRADING COMPANY v. UNION OF INDIA

04 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2759-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a detailed response and directed the authorities to dispose of the GST cancellation Show Cause Notice after personal hearing, without deciding on merits.

tax other GST registration Show Cause Notice cancellation non-existence

Harinder Singh Butola v. Premier Security Services Pvt Ltd and Anr

04 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3133

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s award dismissing the petitioner’s claim for reinstatement and back wages, holding no employer-employee relationship existed between the petitioner and respondents.

labor appeal_dismissed employer-employee relationship burden of proof industrial dispute termination of service

M/s Samrat Constructions Company v. Union of India

04 Apr 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:2763-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the arbitral award's counter claim portion for lack of reasons and held that the limitation period for filing the Section 34 petition was extended by the Supreme Court's COVID-19 orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition Limitation period extension Reasoned arbitral award

Sadhu Charan Datta v. The Delhi Safe Deposit Co. Ltd.

04 Apr 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:3075

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act against a former Director who resigned before the cheque issuance, holding that mere directorship without control over company affairs is insufficient for liability.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Director liability Quashing of complaint

Religare Finvest Limited v. Widescreen Holdings Private Limited and Ors.

04 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3004

The Delhi High Court held that the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator had not terminated de jure or de facto and extended her mandate to complete arbitration proceedings, dismissing the petition for substitution.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 Section 15 Section 29A

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd v. Reliance Industries Ltd & Anr.

04 Apr 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:2924-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the APTEL's order allowing Reliance Industries Limited's impleadment as a party with limited rights in appeals challenging PNGRB's declaration of ATF pipelines as common carriers, dismissing the appellants' challenge to the impleadment.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant impleadment Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board Act, 2006 common carrier Aviation Turbine Fuel pipeline

First Crush Cafe Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Amit Kumar Goyal

04 Apr 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:3015

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint under Section 138 NI Act and set aside the summoning order due to attachment of an incorrect demand notice and lack of proper judicial scrutiny.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dishonour of cheque statutory demand notice summoning order

MS. RADHIKA S. ICHHPUNIANI & ANR v. M/S SUDVIN FINVEST FAIRDEALS (P.) LTD. & ORS

04 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2914

The Delhi High Court directed transfer of nascent winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT in accordance with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

corporate other Significant winding up Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013 Section 434

First Crush Cafe Pvt. Ltd & Anr. v. Shubham Jain

04 Apr 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:3014

The High Court quashed a cheque dishonour complaint and summoning order due to attachment of an incorrect statutory demand notice and lack of judicial scrutiny by the trial court.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act statutory demand notice cheque dishonour summoning order

Harish Verma v. Joginder Pal Singh

04 Apr 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:3036-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a commercial suit plaint cannot be dismissed at the threshold for failure to comply with mandatory pre-litigation mediation without a thorough examination of whether the suit contemplates urgent interim relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pre-litigation mediation Section 12A Commercial Courts Act Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC urgent interim relief

M/S ALOK INDUSTRIES v. M/S JAI SHREE POLYPLAST PVT. LTD.

04 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2913

The Delhi High Court transferred a nascent winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT in light of the Companies Act, 2013 and Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, emphasizing the new insolvency regime's primacy.

corporate other Significant winding up Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013 Section 434

Sunny Tiwari and Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

04 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2735

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 308 IPC amicable settlement

Lakshay Jaiswal v. State NCT of Delhi

04 Apr 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:2908

The Delhi High Court set aside a revisional order passed without notice to the accused, emphasizing the mandatory right to be heard before prejudicial orders under Sections 399 and 401 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 82 CrPC Section 438 CrPC Section 399 CrPC Section 401 CrPC

Sonny Sarna & Anr v. Urmil Wadhawan & Ors

04 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2872

The Delhi High Court allowed limited additional documents to be filed in a suit for possession, holding that only documents relevant to ownership claims are admissible while excluding those supporting admitted facts.

civil other Section 151 CPC Order 8 Rule 1A(3) CPC additional documents possession

Janata Party v. Election Commission of India & Anr.

04 Apr 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:2825

The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission of India cannot adjudicate internal disputes of unrecognized political parties and recognition of office bearers requires a civil court order.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Election Commission of India unrecognized political party internal dispute office bearers recognition