Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Naveen Kumar v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2805

The Delhi High Court held that a director who signed a dishonoured cheque cannot avoid liability under Section 138 NI Act merely by claiming resignation before the cheque was dated, and quashing of complaint is not warranted without compelling evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC vicarious liability

North Delhi Power Limited v. Dr. U.K. Priyadarshi

05 Apr 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:2724-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an ad hoc appointee without open competitive recruitment has no right to regularization, setting aside the order reinstating the respondent and upholding his termination.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization ad hoc appointment open competitive recruitment Union Public Service Commission

Rakesh Chander Chadda v. Shri Vinod Kumar Aggarwal

05 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2785

The Delhi High Court upheld conditional leave to defend in a suit for recovery on a dishonoured cheque, emphasizing that admission of signatures and prima facie evidence suffice to impose conditions for defence under Order XXXVII CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend conditional leave negotiable instruments act

The Bhaktivedanta Book Trust India v. WWW.FRIENDWITHBOOKS.CO

05 Apr 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:3083

The Delhi High Court held that a sanyasi does not lose copyright ownership by renunciation and upheld the valid assignment of copyright by Srila Prabhupada to the plaintiff Trust, granting summary judgment against copyright infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant sanyasi renunciation copyright ownership intellectual property

Tasleem v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.

05 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2832-DB

The Court held that a major daughter who has married of her own free will cannot be compelled to return to her parents through a writ of Habeas Corpus.

family petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus adult daughter marriage personal liberty

Honey Verma v. Piyush Nautiyal

05 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2796

The Delhi High Court quashed a Section 138 NI Act complaint for non-compliance of the statutory requirement that the legal notice must demand the exact cheque amount.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act legal notice cheque dishonour strict compliance

Anuradha Kashyap v. Dr Sushil Kumar

05 Apr 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:2787-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal to cross-examine the respondent despite prior adjournments, granted condonation of delay, imposed costs for procedural delay, and directed the Family Court to proceed without further adjournments.

family appeal_allowed condonation of delay cross-examination adjournment costs

Chetan Garg v. Avato Ward 105 State Goods and Service Tax and Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2881-DB

The Delhi High Court held that pending GST recovery proceedings do not bar cancellation of GST registration and directed cancellation effective from the date sought by the petitioner.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation Show Cause Notice GST DRC-01 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017

Laxmi Traders Proprietor Dipanshu Garg v. Principal Commissioner of GST Department of Trade and Taxes & Anr

05 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:2798-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a GST demand order passed without issuing a mandatory show cause notice, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness under Section 73 of the CGST Act.

tax petition_allowed Section 73 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 show cause notice demand order principles of natural justice

Mohd. Amin v. Mohd. Iqbal

05 Apr 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:2767

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing redelivery of disputed land and compensation, holding that the claims were not barred by limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act and that the award did not violate principles of natural justice or public policy.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 Limitation Act Section 34 challenge Compromise Agreement

Dinesh Chauhan v. Sitwat Khalid; Ram Pratap v. Shahid Ahmed Ferozie

05 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2762

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of defendants' applications to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that permission under the Slum Areas Act is required only for eviction of tenants and that disputed title and tenancy issues must be decided at trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1956 Section 19 Slum Areas Act

MS. P v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

05 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2795

The Delhi High Court set aside a bail order granted without serving the victim notice or hearing her, emphasizing the victim’s right to participate in bail proceedings as per Supreme Court directives.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail victim rights notice of bail application right to be heard

Anil Metre v. Pooja Press and Prakashan Pvt. Ltd

05 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla

The Delhi High Court set aside a revisional court order passed without hearing the petitioner, restored the revision petitions for fresh hearing, and stayed trial proceedings pending decision.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 CrPC Negotiable Instruments Act revision petition right to be heard

Pankaj Singh v. Bashir Ahmed Haroon & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2024:DHC:2923
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator, holding that subsequent partnership deeds without arbitration clauses superseded earlier agreements and the petitioner cannot invoke arbitration after filing civil suits.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Partnership deed Arbitration clause

Dheeraj Rastogi v. Dnata International Pvt Ltd.

05 Apr 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:2945-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the arbitral award upholding the validity of the appellant's termination for concealment of fraud, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration awards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 termination of employment

Dr Shashi Bhushan v. University of Delhi

05 Apr 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2847

The Delhi High Court held that a waitlisted candidate has no right to appointment to a post vacated by resignation of a selected candidate after joining, and such vacancies must be filled by fresh advertisement and selection.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant waitlist appointment vacancy due to resignation fresh advertisement right to appointment

Janak Datwani v. CNA Exports Pvt Ltd & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:2928-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the designation of the oldest consolidated suit as the lead suit, holding such procedural orders are not appealable under Section 10 of the Delhi High Court Act, 1966.

civil appeal_dismissed lead suit consolidation of suits designation of lead suit Section 10 Delhi High Court Act

Sanjay Goel v. Majestic Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

05 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3772

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a commercial suit, holding that mere dissatisfaction with interlocutory orders does not justify transfer absent clear evidence of bias or manifest injustice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 24 CPC transfer of suit jurisdictional competence commercial courts

Sanjay Goel v. BKR Capital Pvt. Ltd.

05 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3773
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a commercial suit, holding that mere dissatisfaction with interlocutory orders does not justify transfer absent cogent evidence of bias or manifest injustice.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 24 CPC transfer of suit competence of court commercial courts

Sunil Adv v. Rajeev Ranjan

05 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3115-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for seizure disorder, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-related unless conclusively disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces seizure disorder attributable to service