Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Nimit Gandhi v. Harshita G. Gandhi

08 Apr 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:3029-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs. 25,000 per month granted to the wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, upholding the order as reasonable and sustainable.

family appeal_dismissed interim maintenance Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act Family Court coordinate Bench

Food Corporation of India v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

08 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh

The Delhi High Court upheld the liability of the Food Corporation of India as principal employer to pay Provident Fund dues for contract workers under Section 7-A of the EPF Act, dismissing challenges based on non-impleading of contractors and non-production of records.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Section 7-A principal employer liability contract labour

Sameer Bahadur v. Union of India

08 Apr 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:2861-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the DRAT’s pre-deposit requirement and refused to interfere with the ongoing SARFAESI appeals, directing the petitioner to seek early hearing before the tribunal.

civil petition_dismissed SARFAESI Act pre-deposit Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal appeal admission

Appolo Handloom Manufacturing Co-Op. Society Ltd. v. All India Handloom Fabrics Society

08 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6345

The Delhi High Court held that the Central Registrar under the MSCS Act has the exclusive power to appoint a substitute arbitrator upon recusal, directing timely appointment and communication to parties.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Multi State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002 Section 84 MSCS Act Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14(1)(b) Arbitration Act

Gautam Dutta v. Registrar of Societies & Anr.

07 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh, J · 2024:DHC:2453
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that interim relief in a writ petition challenging election rules of a private society cannot be granted without first deciding the writ petition’s maintainability under Article 12 of the Constitution.

administrative other Significant writ petition maintainability Article 12 Constitution of India private society writ jurisdiction interim relief

Jeeramani Nursing School v. Indian Nursing Council

07 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:4675

The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Nursing Council to decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks, disposing of the writ petition with liberty to challenge the decision further.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition representation statutory authority reasonable time

Delhi Technological University v. Mr. Chander Shekhar

05 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2758
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a recovery suit filed beyond the three-year limitation period without valid acknowledgment of debt is barred and liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Section 18 Limitation Act rejection of plaint

Ravish Beniwal v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2817-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking custody of a daughter in a matrimonial dispute, directing the petitioner to seek custody or visitation rights before the Family Court.

family petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus custody dispute matrimonial dispute child welfare

Sh Bhupender v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi

05 Apr 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:2751

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail in a rape case arising from an alleged false promise of marriage, holding that mere breach of promise without mala fide intent does not vitiate consent under Section 375 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail false promise of marriage consent vitiation Section 376 IPC

Gajendra Singh v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

05 Apr 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:2873

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a construction contract, holding that limitation and arbitrability objections are primarily for the arbitral tribunal to decide unless claims are manifestly time barred.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Limitation Act, 1963 Dispute Redressal Committee

Chander Prabha v. Delhi Technological University

05 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2760
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a recovery suit filed beyond the three-year limitation period is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC, and that mere RTI replies or reminders do not extend limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation period Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC rejection of plaint Section 18 Limitation Act

Sanjay Yadav v. Delhi Transport Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Manmohan, ACJ; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J · 2024:DHC:2838-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a public interest litigation challenging the removal of a bus queue shelter as factually incorrect and legally misconceived.

administrative petition_dismissed public interest litigation bus queue shelter administrative action Resident Welfare Association

Container Corporation of India Limited v. Roadwings International Pvt. Limited

05 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:2765

The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 starts from receipt of the majority award, not the dissenting opinion or certified copy, and dismissed the petition as barred by limitation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Majority Award Dissenting Opinion Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

TWC Aviation Capital Limited v. SpiceJet Limited

05 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2850

The Delhi High Court held that UK Court orders relating to aircraft lease disputes are enforceable in India under Sections 13 and 44A CPC and allowed the plaintiff’s suit for declaration and injunction to secure possession of aircraft and engines.

civil appeal_allowed Significant foreign judgment enforcement Section 13 CPC Section 44A CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015

Kuldeep Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

05 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2806
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an accused cannot invoke Section 91 Cr.P.C. at the charge framing stage to summon documents relevant only to defence, dismissing the petition seeking such production as a prohibited fishing inquiry.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 91 Cr.P.C. charge framing stage roving and fishing inquiry production of documents

Dhruva Goel v. M/S Chetanya Buildcon Pvt Ltd & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2783

The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance directing defendants to execute the sale deed for the property after full payment and possession, with conditions on power of attorney and tax discharge.

civil appeal_allowed specific performance agreement to sell sale deed execution power of attorney

Dhruva Goel v. M/S Chetanya Buildcon Pvt Ltd & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2783

The Delhi High Court decreed specific performance directing the defendants to execute the sale deed after the plaintiff paid the sale consideration and took possession, while waiving monetary claims.

civil appeal_allowed specific performance agreement to sell sale deed execution power of attorney

Arjun Mehta v. Saurav Gupta & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2845

The Delhi High Court held that a broadly worded arbitration clause in an MoU is binding and arbitrable despite the petitioner not signing the MoU, and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising therefrom.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration agreement Memorandum of Understanding Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act Arbitrability

Rakesh Chander Chadda v. Shri Vinod Kumar Aggarwal

05 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2784

The Delhi High Court upheld conditional leave to defend in a summary suit for recovery on a dishonoured cheque, emphasizing that admission of signature and promissory note suffice for prima facie defence under Order XXXVII CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit cheque dishonour

Pardeep v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:2890-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a disability sustained during authorized leave without causal connection to military service does not entitle a naval personnel to disability pension.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension military service attributable disability authorized leave