Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Asha Rani v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Apr 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:2883
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of a suicide abetment case, holding that mere mention in a suicide note without proximate causal acts or mens rea is insufficient to proceed under Section 306 IPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC suicide note dying declaration

Pr. Commissioner of I Tax (Central)-II v. M/s Trent East West LPG Bottling Ltd.

09 Apr 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:2827-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Income Tax Settlement Commission's order granting settlement and immunity to the assessee, holding that the requirement of full and true disclosure under Section 245C was satisfied despite inconsistent stands, and dismissed the writ petition challenging the settlement.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission full and true disclosure Section 245C Income Tax Act immunity from prosecution

Jamia Millia Islamia v. Sh. Vikas

09 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:2846

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Tribunal's award holding the termination of a probationer without inquiry and retrenchment benefits illegal, directing reinstatement with 50% back wages and dismissing the writ petition challenging the award.

labor petition_dismissed Significant illegal termination probation period reinstatement back wages

Sanjay Verma v. State Through SHO & Anr.

09 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2899-DB

The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking custody of a major wife who voluntarily chose to stay with her parents, holding that Habeas Corpus cannot be used to override her free will.

family petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus custody major wife free will

Ram Singh v. State

09 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2884-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 376 IPC and POCSO Act but reduced his life sentence to 10 years considering his age, remorse, and period already served.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 376 IPC POCSO Act quantum of sentence life imprisonment

Satyendra Nath Singh v. Union of India

09 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:2918-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that departmental proceedings against a retired government servant must be instituted within four years of the alleged misconduct, quashing a charge framed beyond this period while allowing other independent charges to proceed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant departmental proceedings limitation period Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021 Rule 8(2)(c)(ii)

Ganapa Kalyan Kumar v. Indian Coast Guard & Ors.

09 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:2848-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to participate in a recruitment exam due to delay and laches, holding that relief cannot be granted after subsequent exam stages have commenced.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition delay and laches recruitment examination Indian Coast Guard

Life Insurance Corporation of India and Anr. v. Erina Michael

09 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:2875-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the order granting promotion ignoring a penalty imposed without inquiry, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication after allowing the respondent to challenge the penalty and disciplinary proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant sealed cover procedure promotion disciplinary proceedings minor penalty

Saksham Commodities Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 22(1), Delhi & Anr.

09 Apr 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:2836-DB

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act requires incriminating material specifically linked to the assessment years sought to be reopened, and absent such material, the notices and proceedings are illegal and unsustainable.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act incriminating material reassessment search and seizure

Sanjeev Goyal v. Achal Gupta

09 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5932

The Delhi High Court directed the arbitrator to dispose of the interim relief application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, maintaining the Court's interim order.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration Section 17 Interim relief Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Unthinkable Solutions LLP v. Droom Technology Limited

09 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6185

The Delhi High Court directed the dispute under a Service Agreement to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving all factual and legal issues to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(2) Section 21

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways v. M/S Dilip Buildcon Limited and Mostobudivelnyi Zahin No 112 (Joint Venture)

09 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6673
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that pre-arbitral conciliation steps were directory, the ICADR validly appointed the petitioner’s arbitrator after default, and dismissed the challenge to the arbitral tribunal’s constitution.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration conciliation directory vs mandatory appointment of arbitrator

Union of India v. Shri Sihor Ram

09 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:397-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition, upholding the CAT's order that recovery of excess pension payments from a retired employee without notice is impermissible under established Supreme Court precedents.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant excess payment recovery pay fixation error Class III and IV employees retirement benefits

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Mamta & Ors.

08 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2843
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award holding the insurance company liable to pay compensation as the driver held a valid license for the light motor vehicle category under which the offending vehicle was classified.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driving license validity light motor vehicle heavy passenger motor vehicle

NORTH EAST CENTRE OF TECHNOLOGY APPLICATION AND REACH (NECTAR) v. DIVINE BAMBOO MAT MANUFACTURING PVT. LTD. & ANR.

08 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:2906

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of a substitute Arbitrator after the original Arbitrator abandoned proceedings, ensuring continuation of arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Substitute Arbitrator Section 14 Limitation period

RIKA GLOBAL IMPEX LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

08 Apr 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MANMOHAN; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA · 2024:DHC:2862-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified that it did not grant liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition before the Bombay High Court after withdrawal, leaving maintainability to the latter court's discretion.

constitutional other writ petition liberty to file fresh petition withdrawal of petition maintainability

Union of India and Anr. v. Syed Sajid Ali

08 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2826-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing full pay and allowances for a government servant suspended in contemplation of disciplinary proceedings that ended with a minor penalty, rejecting the petitioners' attempt to justify suspension based on criminal proceedings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension disciplinary proceedings minor penalty Rule 10(1)(a)

Kokila Gupta v. Indu Bala & Anr.

08 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2859

The High Court allowed the petition to transfer a civil suit concerning property to itself to avoid conflicting decisions with related suits pending before it.

civil appeal_allowed transfer of suit civil suit property dispute conflicting decisions

Anju Jain & Anr. v. M/S. WTC Noida Development Company Private Limited

08 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2849

The Delhi High Court held that the seat of arbitration designated as New Delhi confers jurisdiction on it to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, rejecting the respondent's objection based on exclusive jurisdiction of Noida courts.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 seat of arbitration jurisdiction

Kaira District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd & Anr. v. D N Bahri Trading as The Veldon Chemical and Food Product & Anr.

08 Apr 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:2868

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners' rectification petition and ordered removal of respondent no.1’s impugned trademark under Class 32 for non-use and infringement of the well-known 'AMUL' mark.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 47 non-use Well-known trademark Rule 33 Trade Marks Rules, 2017