Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
M/S SATBIR FILING STATION v. DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER WARD 101
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to consider and grant interest on the petitioner's delayed VAT refund under Section 42 of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004.
Tarapore & Co v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed tax refund under the DVAT Act is payable only for three years preceding the petition filing, directing payment of interest at 6% on the refund amount for that period.
Yamal Manojbhai Jagada v. Chief Commissioner of Customs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Additional Commissioner of Customs is competent to adjudicate a Show Cause Notice despite the Commissioner of Customs filing an affidavit in related proceedings, dismissing the petition seeking adjudication only by a Commissioner-level officer.
M/S. BALAJI TRADING CO. v. THE COMMISSIONER & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed adjudication of a GST Show Cause Notice within two weeks after affording personal hearing, without commenting on merits.
Cobra Instalaciones y Servicios, S.A and Shyam Indus Power Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd.
The Delhi High Court ordered release of the deposited arbitral award amount to the petitioner after dismissal of the respondent's challenges, enforcing the award in full.
Rajiv Sinha Deceased Through Legal Representatives v. Teneron Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of commercial execution proceedings to an ordinary court and referred the dispute to mediation for amicable settlement.
M/S SANT STEEL AND ALLOYS PRIVATE LIMITED v. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition after the GST authority vacated the attachment of the petitioner's bank account and directed the bank to comply with the vacating order.
M/S BIBA FASHION LTD v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
Fresenius Medical Care India Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed that the IGST rate on import of dialysis machines under HSN code 90189031 is 5% as per the notification dated 13.10.2023, binding the respondents to this rate subject to HSN code verification.
M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition after the GST authority vacated the attachment of the petitioner's bank account and directed the bank to comply with the vacating order.
Rachna Sagar Pvt Ltd v. Sovereign Mercantile Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court confirmed interim injunction restraining defendants from using marks deceptively similar to plaintiff’s prior-used and registered trademarks, holding that plaintiff demonstrated prima facie passing off.
Vateena Begum v. Shamim Zaffar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for condonation of nearly seven years' delay in filing a first appeal, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Manish Gupta v. M/S P Singh Chit Fund Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition setting aside the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex parte decree due to non-service of summons, directing the petitioner to deposit part of the decree amount and appear for trial.
JK Lakshmi Cement Limited v. Ram Byash Yadav
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to JK Lakshmi Cement Ltd. against unauthorized use of deceptively similar trademarks and trade dress by Defendant No. 1, affirming protection for well-known marks and allowing summary adjudication in absence of defense.
Vodafone Idea Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II
The Delhi High Court held that orders under Section 7-Q of the EPF Act are not independently appealable but interest computations under Section 7-Q included in Section 14-B orders can be challenged, and set aside a recovery certificate issued despite a conditional stay on damages.
D.T.C. v. Ami Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award setting aside a termination order due to a flawed departmental inquiry and limited the scope of writ jurisdiction in labor disputes.
AIIMS v. Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award granting compensation in lieu of reinstatement to a daily wage worker acquitted of theft charges, emphasizing limited writ jurisdiction and discretionary relief in labor disputes.
CP Century Hardware Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Skywood Interior Solutions
The Delhi High Court held that for an application under Order VII Rule 10(2) CPC, the court must accept the plaint's averments as true and if they disclose territorial jurisdiction, the plaint cannot be returned.
Gautam Mehra v. Sonia Mehra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against Family Court directions on child custody visitation due to non-compliance and rendered the appeal ineffective by the passage of time, leaving pending matters to the Family Court.
SPLENDOR BUILDWELL PVT LTD & ANR. v. RAJESH KUMAR PASRICHA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the limited grounds under Section 34 do not permit interference with the arbitrator's reasoned decision awarding principal and interest in a real estate dispute.