Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

AL IRSHAD HAJ GROUP v. Union of India

10 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2937

The Delhi High Court held that experience of a deceased sole proprietor cannot be transferred to a new proprietor for eligibility under the Haj Group Organizer Policy, dismissing the petition challenging the ineligibility order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant sole proprietorship perpetual succession Haj Group Organizer Policy experience transfer

Oscar Tours and Travels v. Union of India

10 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2939

The Delhi High Court held that experience of a deceased sole proprietor cannot be transferred to a new proprietor for eligibility as a Haj Group Organizer under government policy, dismissing the petition challenging the ineligibility order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant sole proprietorship perpetual succession Haj Group Organizer experience transfer

MIC HAJJ CELL v. Union of India

10 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2938

The Delhi High Court held that experience of a sole proprietorship firm does not transfer to a new proprietor upon the original proprietor's death, upholding the firm's ineligibility as a Haj Group Organizer under the new proprietor.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant sole proprietorship perpetual succession Haj Group Organizer experience transfer

Hajj E Betullah Haj Umrah Tour Corporation v. Union of India

10 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2936
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the government's revised Haj Policy categorization, ruling that no vested right exists for the petitioner to be upgraded to Category-I HGO and that policy decisions are subject to limited judicial review.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Haj Group Organizer Haj Policy 2019-23 Haj Policy 2023 Category-I HGO

Bhimavaram Community Network BCN v. M/S Super Cassettes Industries Pvt. Ltd.

10 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:2915

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the dismissal of its application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the respondent's suit alleging copyright infringement and seeking urgent relief was maintainable despite delay and non-compliance with pre-institution mediation, which cannot be bypassed by mere prayer for urgent relief.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pre-institution mediation Section 12-A Commercial Courts Act Order VII Rule 11 CPC urgent interim relief

Union of India & Ors. v. Namrata Semwal

10 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:2896-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order directing conversion of the employee’s provident fund from CPF to GPF based on the Government OM and consistent employee representations, dismissing the Union of India’s writ petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Contributory Provident Fund Scheme General Provident Fund (Pension) Scheme Government of India OM 01.09.1988 option for provident fund scheme

M/S OASIS PROJECTS LTD. v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD

10 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2897

The Delhi High Court held that automatic debarment following contract termination requires a specific notice and hearing under principles of natural justice, and suspended the debarment pending arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant debarment termination natural justice show cause notice

M/S OASIS PROJECTS LTD. v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.

10 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2897
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that debarment following contract termination requires a specific show cause notice and hearing under natural justice, and stayed the two-year debarment imposed on the appellant pending arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant debarment termination natural justice show cause notice

Vikas Chander v. State and Ors

10 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:2969

The Delhi High Court granted probate of the last Will of Mrs. Manorama Dhawal to her son, accepting a joint valuation report and exempting surety bond due to direct descendants as beneficiaries.

civil petition_allowed probate Will executor valuation report

Manu Wadhwa @ Mohit v. The State, Govt of NCT of Delhi

10 Apr 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:2959

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail in a multi-victim cheating case where the accused failed to comply with a mediation settlement and did not cooperate with investigation, necessitating custodial interrogation.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail cheating mediation settlement custodial interrogation

Bhavreen Kandhari v. Mandeep Mittal

10 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2942

The Delhi High Court held that felling a tree based on a forged permission letter in violation of its order constitutes wilful contempt, directing a hearing on punishment under the Contempt of Courts Act.

administrative other Significant contempt of court wilful disobedience forgery tree felling

MG Tours and Travels v. Union of India

10 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:2940

The Delhi High Court held that experience of a deceased sole proprietor cannot be transferred to a partnership firm formed thereafter for eligibility under the Haj Group Organizer Policy, dismissing the petition challenging the ineligibility order.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant sole proprietorship partnership firm Haj Group Organizer Policy experience transfer

Rohit Kumar & Anr. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:2905

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under cheating and IT Act provisions on the basis of an amicable settlement and refund of money, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 420 IPC

Manju Pandey v. State Through SHO PS Wazirpur & Anr.

10 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:2920-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the State to take effective investigative steps and protect complainant privacy in a missing child case, ordering monthly status reports and procedural reforms.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Habeas Corpus missing child Section 363 IPC Article 226 Constitution

Tejbir Singh v. State & Ors.

10 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3056

The Delhi High Court granted Probate to the sole Executor after holding the Will dated 06.04.2012 validly executed and genuine under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

civil petition_allowed Probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Will execution Attesting witnesses

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) 2, Delhi v. Pankaj Buildwell Ltd. & Group

10 Apr 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:2919-DB
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Income Tax Settlement Commission lacks jurisdiction to proceed with settlement applications lacking full and true disclosure under Section 245C of the Income Tax Act, and set aside the ITSC order granting immunity and accepting incomplete disclosures.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245C full and true disclosure bogus share capital

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited v. Rajinder Singh Joon & Ors.

10 Apr 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:2869-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld summary dismissal of BPCL's suit for renewal of lease, holding renewal requires mutual agreement and specific performance is barred for determinable leases.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Lease Deed renewal Specific performance Order XII Rule 6 CPC Transfer of Property Act Section 106

Rajender Prasad Sharma v. NCB

10 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:2866
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case, holding that the prosecution failed to establish prima facie that the mulethi supplied contained heroin and that voluntary statements under Section 67 NDPS Act are inadmissible.

criminal bail_granted Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail voluntary statement inadmissibility

Neerja Tiku v. School of Planning and Architecture & Anr

10 Apr 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:2891

The Delhi High Court held that an employee’s option to continue under the CPF Scheme exercised after the prescribed cutoff date is invalid, deeming her covered under the Pension Scheme as per the 1987 Office Memorandum and Supreme Court precedent.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Contributory Provident Fund Scheme General Provident Fund cum Pension Scheme Office Memorandum 01.05.1987 option exercise cutoff date

Rajesh Kumar Singhal v. The Goods and Services Tax Network

10 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3126-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed a vague and defective GST Show Cause Notice proposing cancellation of registration, directing issuance of a proper notice with particulars and hearing.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice GST registration cancellation vagueness natural justice