Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Mohd Zahid v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avto Ward 10 Zone 2, State GST, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for re-adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
M/S BOXCOWORLD LOGISTICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after a personal hearing.
Spinclabs Private Limited v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand and penalty orders for failure to consider detailed replies and violation of natural justice, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with personal hearing.
Bakshi Aerosole v. Commissioner of DGST Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective satisfaction and due process, setting aside the cancellation order for lack of reasons and hearing.
Tarapore & Co v. Commissioner of Trade & Taxes & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to statutory interest at 1.5% per month on delayed refund under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 for the three years preceding the petition filing, despite the Act's repeal.
M/S. VISHAL CHEM (INDIA) v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte tax demand order under Section 73 of the CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remitted the matter for re-adjudication after affording a proper hearing.
KAYCEE POLYMERS PVT. LTD. v. THE UNION OF INDIA REVENUE SECRETARY & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic order confirming tax demand under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the taxpayer's detailed reply and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with opportunity of hearing.
Jitender Kumar Kushwaha v. Albert Joseph & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a civil suit, emphasizing that procedural timelines are directory and substantial justice must prevail at the initial stage of litigation.
Mallcom (India) Limited v. Shanti Udyog Weldsafe Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction protecting the plaintiff's registered trademark "TIGER" against defendants' deceptively similar "CD TIGER" mark, recognizing prior use and likelihood of consumer confusion.
Rakshit Jain v. Emaar India Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the exclusion of the Capital Tower project from a demerger scheme and confirmed joint custody of title deeds, clarifying that the judgment does not affect pending suits or arbitration rights.
State NCT of Delhi v. Rahul @ Gagan Deep Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a POCSO sexual assault case, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to prove the victim's minority, unexplained delay, and contradictory DNA evidence.
KARMYOGI SHELTERS PVT. LTD. v. BENARSI KRISHNA COMMITTEE & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that interest on an arbitral award amount ceases from the date the judgment-debtor tenders payment in writing which the decree-holder refuses, and dismissed limitation and party impleading objections in the execution petition.
MMTC Ltd v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's finding that workers engaged through changing contractors without valid licenses are employees of the principal employer but are not entitled to regularization as a matter of right.
Reserve Bank of India v. CRB Capital Markets Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed payment of Rs. 25 crores to the Official Liquidator for the company's share in disputed lands and reconstituted the Disbursement Committee to continue claims disbursement in the long-pending CRB liquidation proceedings.
MS ADRIEL HIGH SCHOOL v. DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to decide the petitioner school’s representation on seat reduction and entry-level class designation within three weeks before allotting EWS category students.
Magnum Steels Ltd & Ors. v. Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery proceedings under the RDDB Act can be maintained simultaneously with SARFAESI Act proceedings and dismissed the writ petition challenging the DRT order for recovery of debt.
Ritu Phore v. Ramjas School
The Delhi High Court held that an employee who resigns and joins another institution severs prior employment, and seniority cannot be retained upon reinstatement without continuous service.
Manish Kumar & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of court process.
M/S SLG TRADING CO v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II/ AVATO
The Delhi High Court directed the tax officer to provide personal hearing and conduct a fresh visit before deciding on cancellation of GST registration based on non-existence at the registered premises.
Nawal Kishor Sharma and Ors. v. The State GNCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.