Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

M/S Scindia Potteries and Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3109

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing substitution of legal heirs after the plaintiff's death, condoning delay caused by COVID-19, and held that the right to sue for possession and injunction survives in favor of legal heirs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 3 CPC substitution of legal heirs abatement of suit limitation period

Anurag v. Indira Gandhi National Open University

16 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3079

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking original academic documents after the university confirmed dispatch and arrangements for collection of the mark-sheet and provisional degree.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition original mark-sheet provisional degree result declaration

Arpita Sahu v. GK Pillai

16 Apr 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3066

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition, holding that the petitioners are not entitled to regularization or monetary benefits for the period prior to their regular appointment as LDCs, and that merits of such claims cannot be adjudicated in contempt proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization Lower Division Clerk Central Secretariat Clerical Service Rules, 1962 Rule 12(b)

Surender Singh Deswal v. Delhi Development Authority

16 Apr 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2014:DHC:922-DB

The Delhi High Court held that successful writ petitioners for DDA flats delayed due to State fault must pay the price prevailing on the writ filing date, not the allotment date, with interest.

property appeal_allowed Significant DDA Housing Scheme 2008 wait-listed applicants price of allotment writ petition

Kamal Bhasin v. Ghanshyam Kumar & Anr.

16 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3093

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for failure to prove willful disobedience, holding that the respondents complied with the Court’s RTI disclosure directions regarding complaints against the then CMD of PFCL.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Willful disobedience Right to Information Act Section 8(1)(j) RTI

Jindal India Thermal Power Limited v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3052

The court held that release of pledged equity shares under the MRA requires valid transfer of 10% equity to lenders including execution of a Share Purchase Agreement, and until such compliance, the lenders are not obligated to release the shares.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Master Resolution Agreement pledge release equity shares transfer Share Purchase Agreement

M/S. KAWATRA TENTS AND CATERERS PVT. LTD. v. DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD

16 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3089

The Delhi High Court held that a unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by a disqualified party under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is void ab initio and stayed the arbitration proceedings pending further hearing.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration unilateral appointment disqualification Section 12(5)

Inder Goel v. The State & Anr.

16 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3065

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking police investigation into alleged illegal property transfer, holding the dispute to be civil in nature and not warranting criminal inquiry under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. leasehold to freehold conversion Gift Deed

R K Agarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3017-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the resumption of disciplinary proceedings and penalty of withholding pension imposed on a reinstated government servant, dismissing his writ petition challenging the penalty and denial of promotion.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant departmental inquiry disciplinary proceedings withholding pension reinstatement

Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited v. Amit Bansal

16 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3008

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging acquittal in an electricity theft case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove dishonest meter tampering beyond reasonable doubt and that the forensic report lacked requisite expert basis.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135 theft of electricity expert evidence

Rajeev Dagar v. Mukesh Dagar

16 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3076

The Delhi High Court set aside maintenance order passed by a transferred judicial officer who had become functus officio and remanded the appeals for fresh hearing by the successor court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant functus officio transfer order Section 482 CrPC Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act

Syeda Saiyidain Hameda & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3049-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Ministry of Minority Affairs' decision to dissolve the Maulana Azad Education Foundation, finding the dissolution lawful, supported by audit findings, and consistent with the Ministry's comprehensive minority welfare schemes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Maulana Azad Education Foundation Societies Registration Act, 1860 dissolution of society Ministry of Minority Affairs

Raja Khan v. State

16 Apr 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3034
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Bail was granted to the accused in a POCSO case due to doubts about the victim's age, contradictions in evidence, and prolonged custody without timely trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail POCSO Act minor consent contradictory evidence

Central Public Works Department v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

16 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3019

The Delhi High Court upheld recovery of back wages calculated at par with regular employees for a daily rated workman reinstated by final award but not regularised, dismissing the CPWD's challenge to recovery proceedings.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C Section 17-B Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954

Narendra Yadav v. Dilip Rangwani and Anr.

16 Apr 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3051

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition alleging non-compliance with its order on additional documents in disciplinary enquiry, holding that substantial compliance negates contempt absent wilful disobedience.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary enquiry additional documents conduct discipline and appeal rules contempt of court

Zahid Hussain v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

16 Apr 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:3067

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a possession notice issued under SARFAESI Act on the ground that the petitioner has an alternative remedy before the Debt Recovery Tribunal to raise all objections, including notice to a deceased person.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 17 SARFAESI notice to deceased person Debt Recovery Tribunal

Jeetu Kanwar v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2024 · Acting Chief Justice Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:3071-DB

The Delhi High Court expedited the issuance of the appellant's IPC license card by directing the respondents to decide on the representation within a shortened timeframe, recognizing the ministerial nature of the renewal and the urgency due to upcoming Paralympic qualifiers.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant International Paralympic Committee License ministerial act administrative delay para athlete

Videshi Kumar v. State; Ram Nath v. State

16 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:3062-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted two appellants of murder charges due to failure of prosecution to prove motive and last seen evidence conclusively in a circumstantial evidence case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen together motive bloodstained clothes

Prakash Vasant Ajgaonkar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla

The Delhi High Court held that the power to grant interim compensation under Section 143A of the NI Act is discretionary and can only be directed against the drawer of the cheque, setting aside trial court orders imposing such compensation on company directors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 143A Negotiable Instruments Act interim compensation discretionary power drawer of cheque

Sh. Bal Krishan Sharma v. Smt. Kanta Kumari Sharma and Ors.

15 Apr 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:2990

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to admit belated additional evidence in a property dispute, holding that delay due to incorrect legal advice is insufficient cause to admit new documents at the final stage.

civil petition_dismissed Order VII Rule 14 CPC additional evidence belated documents relinquishment deed