Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Gautam Kumar Laha v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:3259-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking bail guidelines for undertrial prisoners, holding the issues are already under active Supreme Court consideration with established procedures in place.

constitutional petition_dismissed undertrial prisoners prison overcrowding bail judicial restraint

Romilla Sawhney v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:3398-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interim orders maintaining status quo prevent land acquisition from lapsing under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, dismissing the petition challenging acquisition of land in Bamnauli.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) 2013 Act interim orders status quo

Vinod Bansal v. M/S INTEC CAPITAL LTD

24 Apr 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:3485

The Delhi High Court quashed a Section 138 NI Act complaint based on an initial cheque after parties entered into a settlement, holding that only complaints arising from dishonour of cheques issued pursuant to the settlement are maintainable, thereby disallowing parallel prosecutions.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC quashing of complaint settlement agreement

Dr. Alok Kumar Tiwari v. Mamta

24 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla, J.

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's maintenance order fixing Rs. 20,000 per month to the wife, affirming the Court's discretion to estimate income when undisclosed and emphasizing maintenance modification upon changed circumstances.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 Cr.P.C. income estimation wife's entitlement

Small Farmers Agri Business Consortium v. M/S K.D. Agro Industries

24 Apr 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:3375-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting a venture capital loan recovery claim as barred by limitation, holding that the limitation period commences from the contractually fixed repayment date, not the date of bank loan recovery.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 limitation period venture capital loan cause of action

Radiant Cash Management Services Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of State GST

24 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3249-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed cryptic and contradictory GST demand orders for failure to pass speaking orders and directed fresh adjudication with personal hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 73 Central Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 input tax credit speaking order personal hearing

Baby Ashwika v. Maxfort School & Anr.

24 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3509

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the respondent school admitted the petitioner as a Disadvantaged Group student with all entitled facilities, treating the admission as regular and permanent.

administrative petition_dismissed admission Disadvantaged Group Directorate of Education writ petition

Sahil Chopra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

24 Apr 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:3284

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding the petitioner liable for license fee arrears, applying Section 17 of the Limitation Act to start limitation upon discovery of fraud, and dismissed the petition challenging the award.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Limitation Act, 1963 Section 17 Limitation Act Section 34 Arbitration Act

Umesh Chandra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3696
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging a transfer order, holding that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting manifest errors and cannot be used to reargue settled issues or act as an appeal.

civil petition_dismissed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 1 CPC error apparent on the face of the record transfer order

State of Kerala v. National Highway Authority of India & Anr.

24 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3305
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral tribunal's order impleading the State of Kerala in arbitration under a contract it did not sign, affirming party autonomy and the independence of separate arbitration agreements.

administrative petition_allowed Significant party autonomy arbitration agreement impleadment concession agreement

Commissioner of Police and Ors. v. Mandeep Kumar

24 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3226-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a candidate whose candidature was unlawfully cancelled based on FIR involvement, emphasizing that reconsideration of issues already decided by the Tribunal is impermissible.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal Recruitment Rules Screening Committee Cancellation of candidature

Manmohan Singh & Anr v. Shital Singh & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3185

The Court held that a life estate granted to a Hindu wife by Will in lieu of maintenance matures into absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the property devolves by intestate succession after her death.

property petition_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 14(1) Section 14(2) life estate

Ester Industries Ltd. v. Indus Polyfilms Specialists Pvt Ltd.

24 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3168

The Delhi High Court transferred a winding up petition pending under the Companies Act, 1956 to the NCLT under the Companies Act, 2013 and Insolvency Code, holding that nascent winding up proceedings must be decided by the NCLT.

corporate other Significant winding up Companies Act 1956 Companies Act 2013 Section 434

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Rakesh Gupta

24 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3225-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing that ad hoc service be counted towards eligibility for promotion when regular promotion was delayed due to administrative failure.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant ad hoc promotion regular promotion Departmental Promotion Committee eligibility criteria

Vaibhav v. Jawaharlal Nehru University

24 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3188
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld JNU's admission policy distinguishing recent Class XII pass-outs from earlier pass-outs as constitutionally valid and dismissed the petition challenging the quota system.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 14 Admission policy Intelligible differentia Academic policy

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nisha Devi & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3194

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the insurer liable for compensation despite the deceased being a gratuitous passenger, affirming insurer liability under a comprehensive policy for rash and negligent driving causing death.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 rash and negligent driving gratuitous passenger insurance liability

THDC India Ltd. v. M/S PCL-INTERTECH LENHYDRO CONSORTIUM JV

24 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3210-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting damages for delay attributable to the appellant, including revision of contract rates beyond the original period, and regularized subletting, dismissing the appellant's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration Act Contract delay Price escalation

MAHAMAYA INFRABUILD PVT. LTD v. EARTHCON CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD

24 Apr 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:3223

The Delhi High Court held that a consent arbitral award providing for revival of arbitration upon non-payment is not enforceable as a decree unless payments are made within stipulated time, dismissing enforcement petition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consent award arbitration enforcement Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996

Sanjay Arora v. Jasmer

24 Apr 2024 · Anish Dayal · 2024:DHC:3221

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining a former employee from using the 'TIGER' trademark, holding that prior continuous use and dishonest adoption justify protection against infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement dishonest adoption former employee interim injunction

Amarjeet Singh v. Union of India

24 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3189-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a BSF constable due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards in recording his guilty plea under Rule 142(2) of the BSF Rules, ordering his reinstatement with benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Border Security Force Act, 1968 Rule 142(2) BSF Rules Summary Security Force Court Plea of guilty