Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Parul Aneja v. Ankit Aneja

24 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2014

The Delhi High Court allowed the transfer of matrimonial proceedings to the Family Court at Patiala House where related cases were pending, to ensure judicial convenience and consistency.

family appeal_allowed transfer petition matrimonial proceedings family court Section 125 Cr.P.C.

Dr Suraj Prakash Seth and Others v. Shukla Uppal

24 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3731
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to set aside an ex parte decree, holding that summons service was valid and the delay in filing the application was inordinate and unexplained despite COVID-19 extensions.

civil petition_dismissed ex parte decree service of summons Order IX Rule 13 CPC Order V Rule 15 CPC

Chima Ram Harnand Rai v. Principal Commissioner Department of Trade and Taxes Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr

24 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3283-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration requires objective reasons and procedural fairness, and modified the cancellation date to the petitioner's application date instead of an arbitrary retrospective date.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation Section 29(2) CGST Act procedural fairness

Natco Pharma v. Novartis AG

24 Apr 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3198-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction in favor of Novartis, holding that the salt form ELT-O patent was prima facie valid under Section 3(d) of the Patents Act and Natco failed to raise a credible challenge to its validity.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patent validity Section 3(d) Patents Act enhanced therapeutic efficacy interim injunction

Sambita Mehta v. Sabita Bose and Anr.

24 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3241

The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of a necessary party and held that dismissal of an earlier suit for non-filing of evidence does not automatically bar a subsequent suit under res judicata, directing production of original documents for adjudication of a property dispute.

civil other Significant res judicata Section 11 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC property dispute

GA Digital Web Word Pvt Ltd v. The Group General Manager Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd

24 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3272

The Delhi High Court upheld the blacklisting of a bidder for submitting a false declaration in a tender but reduced the blacklisting period to the time already served in light of a subsequent court order and government policy.

administrative other Significant blacklisting false declaration tender process No Conviction Certificate

Anil Kumar v. State & Anr.

24 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3265

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to release a seized vehicle on Superdari with reduced surety and struck down the condition prohibiting its future use without legal basis.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Superdari Vehicle release Delhi Excise Act Illicit liquor

Sanjay Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging ICC recommendations and disciplinary proceedings against a Customs Officer, holding that alternate statutory remedies must be exhausted before approaching the Court.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 Internal Complaints Committee disciplinary proceedings alternative remedy

Haryana Shakti College of Education v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

24 Apr 2024 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:3196

The Delhi High Court held that land declared for public purpose under the Delhi Land Reforms Act retains its status despite zoning plans, and an educational institution on such land need not obtain a NoC from DDA for university affiliation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Delhi Development Authority Act, 1957 No Objection Certificate Non-conforming area

Puri Investment & Ors. v. New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:3264

The Delhi High Court set aside a property tax assessment order passed without hearing, quashed related sealing and attachment actions, and directed a fresh hearing and order under the NDMC Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 Section 72 NDMC Act Section 102 NDMC Act principles of natural justice

Purnima Sharma & Ors. v. Renu Sharma & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3240

The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction to allow redevelopment of a property based on unchallenged registered Wills and a development agreement, excluding grandchildren not named in the Wills from property rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim injunction registered Will property partition development agreement

Rumit Kumar v. Transport Department GNCTD

24 Apr 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:3266

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an appeal against vehicle registration suspension for bullet proofing, directing the appellate authority to pass a reasoned order considering statutory grounds under Section 53 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

administrative other Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 53 vehicle registration suspension bullet proofing

Dev Raj Chaudhry v. Raj Kumar & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3377

The Delhi High Court held that a partition suit involving disputed Wills is maintainable without prior declaration of title and can proceed alongside probate proceedings, dismissing applications for rejection and stay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit probate proceedings Will validity court fee

AL ISLAM TOUR CORPORATION v. UNION OF INDIA

24 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3271
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the forfeiture of security deposit and 10-year blacklisting of an unregistered Haj Group Organizer for violating Haj Policy, affirming administrative action independent of criminal proceedings and applying the doctrine of proportionality.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Haj Group Organizer Haj Policy security deposit forfeiture blacklisting

M.C.K.R. Hospital & Ayurvedic R v. Satish Kumar

24 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3203

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's orders setting aside defective domestic enquiries and invalidating the dismissal of a hospital employee, affirming the Tribunal's jurisdiction to adjudicate merits under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act when natural justice is violated.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(2)(b) domestic enquiry principles of natural justice

Larsen and Toubro Limited v. Ireo Victory Valley Private Limited

24 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3186
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a full and final Settlement Agreement superseding original contracts extinguishes the arbitration clause therein, allowing suit for enforcement of the settlement to proceed before the court.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Agreement Arbitration Clause Supersession of Contract Full and Final Settlement

Jeeteshwari Ju Devi v. Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

24 Apr 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:3273

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition concerning gifted defense lands in Madhya Pradesh for lack of territorial jurisdiction under Article 226 and held that disputes arising from pre-Constitution political agreements are barred under Article 363.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 jurisdiction territorial jurisdiction cause of action forum conveniens

Deepak Sangwan v. V. Kameswar Rao & Rajnish Bhatnagar

24 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:3299-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CRPF recruit for impersonation in the written examination based on conclusive forensic evidence of thumb impression and handwriting mismatch.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant impersonation departmental inquiry handwriting analysis thumb impression

Soukin v. The State of NCT of Delhi

24 Apr 2024 · Amit Mahajan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed pre-arrest bail applications in a sextortion and extortion case, holding that serious allegations and prima facie evidence justified custodial interrogation and denial of anticipatory bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail Section 438 CrPC sextortion organized crime

Suruchi Bhasin @ Suruchi Bajaj v. Rajiv Bajaj

24 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3430

The Delhi High Court held that a court-mediated Settlement Agreement, once endorsed and partly performed, is binding and cannot be unilaterally withdrawn, directing decree in terms of the Settlement despite defendant's opposition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Settlement Agreement Partition Suit Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Mediation