Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Rajan Singh v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Others

29 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3361

The Delhi High Court directed police protection for a transgender petitioner contesting Lok Sabha elections, affirming the State's duty under Article 14 to safeguard fundamental rights and ensure equality in the electoral process.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 14 Constitution of India transgender rights police protection fundamental rights

Zulfikar @ Bobby v. State of NCT of Delhi

29 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3336

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC due to unreliable prosecution evidence and failure to prove intentional aiding beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC mens rea witness credibility

Anand Rathi Global Finance Limited v. Accurate Engineering Works & Ors.

29 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3432

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a secured loan dispute where respondents failed to appear despite valid notice.

civil petition_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator secured loan dispute notice of arbitration

Jitendra Kumar Ojha v. Union of India

29 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3342-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the compulsory retirement of a government servant under FR 56(j), ruling that the authority’s discretion was lawfully exercised despite procedural timeline deviations and the petitioner’s exemplary service record.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Fundamental Rule 56(j) compulsory retirement voluntary retirement scheme administrative tribunal

Ashok Kumar Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.

29 Apr 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:3424-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking authoritative interpretation of Section 66 of the PMLA, holding such issues must be raised in proper proceedings and not via PIL.

criminal petition_dismissed Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Section 66 PMLA Enforcement Directorate FIR under Section 154 Cr.P.C.

Shakuntala Devi & Ors. v. Sunil; Shakuntala Devi & Ors. v. Vijay

29 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3341

The Delhi High Court held the vehicle owner and driver liable for a motor accident caused by rash driving, reduced compensation due to claimants' contributory negligence including triple riding and possible intoxication, and upheld partial appeal allowing reduction of compensation.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence triple riding vicarious liability

The Executive Engineer & Ors. v. M/S Bholasingh Jaiprakash Construction Ltd. & Anr.

29 Apr 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:3438-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked to bypass statutory remedies under the MSMED Act and Arbitration Act for challenging arbitration proceedings and awards.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant MSMED Act Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 writ jurisdiction Articles 226 and 227

Deepak Rana v. The Principal VSPK International School & Anr.

29 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar

The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions directing the school to regularize provisional admissions granted under the EWS/DG category and provide all associated facilities.

administrative petition_allowed provisional admission EWS/DG category regularization of admission writ petition

Commissioner of Police Delhi and Ors v. Yash Vir Singh

29 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3386-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order setting aside a police constable's dismissal without departmental enquiry, emphasizing the necessity of cogent reasons under Article 311(2) of the Constitution for dispensing with such enquiry.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant Article 311(2) Constitution of India departmental enquiry dismissal from service preliminary enquiry

Commissioner of Police and Ors. v. Ravinder Singh

29 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3384-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the dismissal of a police constable without departmental enquiry, emphasizing the necessity of cogent reasons before dispensing with enquiry under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 311(2)(b) Constitution of India departmental enquiry dismissal from service natural justice

Union of India and Ors. v. Sheo Narayan Prasad

29 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming that the employer bears the burden to prove non-attribution to military service and limiting certiorari interference to errors of law only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Abhash Kumar Jha v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors.

28 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3558

The Delhi High Court directed Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan to decide the petitioner’s representation for grace marks in Class IX Mathematics within two weeks by a reasoned order.

other other grace marks compartment examination Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan representation

Yuvraj Singh Bundhel v. M/S Brilliant Etoile Private Limited

27 Apr 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to appointing an arbitrator upon existence of an arbitration agreement, without examining merits or pre-arbitral mediation compliance.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arbitration agreement pre-arbitral mediation Section 21 notice

Ajay Medi v. Hemant Mehta

26 Apr 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:3309

The Delhi High Court set aside the stay on a suit for declaration and injunction, holding that a summary possession suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act cannot bar separate suits on different causes of action under Section 10 CPC.

civil petition_allowed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act Section 10 CPC stay of suit summary remedy

Kishore Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

26 Apr 2024 · Rekha Palli; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3297-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that below benchmark ACR entries must be communicated to employees and directed reconsideration of MACP benefits ignoring uncommunicated below benchmark ACRs where representation is futile.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report MACP below benchmark grading communication of ACR

ABB India Ltd v. Power Finance Corporation Limited & Anr.

26 Apr 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:3345

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint, holding that the June 2017 MoM creates a cause of action against the defendants for payment obligations, and the suit is maintainable despite the document being unstamped and insolvency proceedings against other parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action unstamped document Indian Stamp Act 1899

Rahul v. The State and Anr.

26 Apr 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:3603

The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail in a rape case considering delay in FIR, inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's statements, absence of corroborative evidence, and the applicant's cooperation with investigation, imposing conditions to safeguard the victim and investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant pre-arrest bail Section 438 CrPC Section 376 IPC delay in FIR

Sonu @ Sunil v. State of NCT of Delhi

26 Apr 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:3583
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under IPC, POCSO, and Child Marriage Act against a man married to a minor girl with whom he was living happily post-majority, holding that continuing prosecution would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR child marriage POCSO Act

Ram Prakash Yadav and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:3332-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim for financial upgradation beyond the immediate next grade pay under the MACP Scheme, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling that MACP benefits are limited to the immediate next grade pay.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme MACP financial upgradation grade pay

Sachin Kumar v. Union of India; Dnyaneshwar Devarshe v. Union of India

26 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:3301-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions challenging its direction for re-examination of petitioners' fitness after tattoo removal, affirming limited judicial discretion under Article 226 despite MHA guidelines permitting only one Review Medical Examination.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Review Medical Examination Detailed Medical Examination tattoo guidelines Central Armed Police Forces recruitment