Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Bimla v. The Executive Engineer, CPWD

29 Apr 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:3793
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that gratuity is payable for muster roll service under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, rejecting limitation defense and directing payment with interest, thereby protecting employee rights under social welfare legislation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 muster roll employee gratuity claim continuous wrong

Kirpa Ram Thr Devender Kumar Monga v. Durga Devi & Ors.

29 Apr 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:3349

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order setting aside the abatement of a suit and condoning delay in substituting legal representatives of a deceased defendant under Order XXII CPC and the Limitation Act, emphasizing a liberal approach to advance substantial justice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXII Rule 9 CPC abatement of suit condonation of delay sufficient cause

Narender Vats & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

29 Apr 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3362

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a minor road rage incident based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., and imposed a condition of planting saplings as restorative justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement minor offences

Rajat Dhingra v. Emanshi Gulati Marwaha

29 Apr 2024 · Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:3620

The Delhi High Court set aside the Trial Court's non-speaking order dismissing the temporary injunction application in a suit for specific performance and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant temporary injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC specific performance non-speaking order

Saquib Nisar v. State

29 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:3358-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused in the 2008 Delhi serial bomb blasts case under UAPA, holding that prima facie evidence and statutory bar preclude bail despite trial delay and parity arguments.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail under UAPA serial bomb blasts Delhi 2008 Section 43D(5) UAPA prima facie true accusation

Vaishali Jaggi v. Deepak Wasson

29 Apr 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:3456-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed modification of interim custody and visitation arrangements by mutual consent, emphasizing the child's comfort and directing the respondent to cooperate in the child's passport renewal.

family appeal_allowed custody visitation rights interim arrangement child welfare

M/S. SWASTIK ENTERPRISES v. Union of India

29 Apr 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:3757-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for lack of proper communication and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after granting the petitioner an opportunity to respond.

tax remanded Significant Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST Act Show Cause Notice ex-parte order

Mubeen Kadar Shaikh v. State of NCT of Delhi

29 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:3357-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under the NIA Act and UAPA, holding that the accusations against him in the 2008 serial bomb blasts case are prima facie true and statutory bar against bail applies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail under UAPA Section 21(4) NIA Act Section 43-D(5) UAPA terrorism

Azim Khan v. State NCT of Delhi

29 Apr 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3412

The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life convict on humanitarian grounds despite prior re-arrest during parole, emphasizing the rehabilitative purpose of parole and imposing strict conditions.

criminal petition_allowed Significant parole life imprisonment Section 302 IPC Delhi Prison Rules 2018

Shriram General Ins Co Ltd v. Meena Uppal & Ors.

29 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3385

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's writ petition challenging the MACT's refusal to allow belated impleading of parties and summoning of witnesses, affirming that contributory negligence does not absolve insurer liability and emphasizing the claimants' control over party impleadment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Motor Accident Claim Order I Rule 10 CPC Contributory Negligence Joint and Several Liability

Daljit Singh v. Gagandeep Sidhu

29 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3344

The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition setting aside the trial court's dismissal of an application under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and granted possession to the father-in-law against his daughter-in-law, holding that her defence was sham and admissions in pleadings entitled the petitioner to decree on possession.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC admission possession ownership

National Highways Authority of India v. M/S KCC Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

29 Apr 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:3403

The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal despite respondent's unsubstantiated bias allegations, emphasizing that procedural delays caused by parties do not justify tribunal replacement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Tribunal Extension of mandate Section 29A Arbitration and Conciliation Act Bias allegations

Sameer @ Yogesh v. The State of NCT of Delhi

29 Apr 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:3423

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused declared a Proclaimed Offender, considering personal circumstances and trial progress, subject to strict conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Proclaimed Offender Section 439 CrPC robbery

Puneet Goel v. Ajay Nagpal & Anr.

29 Apr 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:3429

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint to seek termination and damages, holding that introducing a fresh cause of action during the pendency of a suit for specific performance is impermissible.

civil petition_dismissed amendment of plaint specific performance termination of contract fresh cause of action

Mansoor Asghar Peerbhoy v. State

29 Apr 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:3359-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under UAPA, holding the statutory bar applicable as accusations were prima facie true, while directing expeditious trial completion.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail Section 43D(5) UAPA prima facie true terrorism

Atma Ram Properties Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Anr

29 Apr 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:3322-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring the suit for trial, holding that a suit cannot be summarily dismissed without deciding all framed issues and that questions of coercion in payment require evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant misuser charges perpetual lease Order XIV Rule 2 CPC summary dismissal

Satpal Singh Sarna & Ors. v. Satya Prakash Bansal

29 Apr 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:3323

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the landlord's bona fide requirement to return and reside in the premises is a sufficient ground for eviction and the Rent Controller's dismissal was perverse.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction petition

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Asit Kumar & Ors

29 Apr 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:3310

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal but enhanced the compensation awarded to a claimant with aggravated permanent disability, clarifying principles for assessing loss of earning capacity and affirming the appellate court's power to suo motu enhance compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Permanent disability compensation Loss of earning capacity Multiplier method

Social Jurist v. Government of NCT of Delhi

29 Apr 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J · 2024:DHC:3353-DB

The Delhi High Court directed immediate delegation of financial powers to the MCD Commissioner to ensure timely provision of free textbooks, uniforms, and writing materials to school children, upholding their fundamental right to education under Article 21-A.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Right to Education Article 21-A RTE Act 2009 statutory benefits

R.S. Misra v. UOI & Ors

29 Apr 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:3343-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ and contempt petitions challenging denial of Selection Grade and pension benefits, upholding the petitioner’s notional promotion to Vice Principal and confirming forfeiture of pension due to termination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant promotion notional promotion service termination ACR grading