Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Jagannath D Parkhi v. Y. Hari Kumar & Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:2602

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR and criminal proceedings for cheating and forgery, holding that a prima facie case existed and the arrest was lawful.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR illegal arrest exemplary damages forgery

Manpreet & Anr v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

19 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2588

The Delhi High Court held that an FIR involving rape under Section 376 IPC cannot be quashed on settlement grounds, but quashed proceedings against the co-accused under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and marriage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC Section 498A IPC dowry demand

Mamta Devi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr

19 Apr 2018 · Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:2589-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the recruitment process for Special Educators as the respondents had taken timely and adequate steps to conduct the recruitment.

administrative petition_dismissed Special Educators recruitment Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board DSSSB writ petition

X v. State of NCT Delhi

19 Apr 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:2591

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a sexual offence trial, holding that mere apprehension of unfair trial without substantive proof does not warrant transfer.

criminal appeal_dismissed transfer petition apprehension of unfair trial recording of evidence victim statement

Mohd. Fahim v. State & Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · S. P. Garg · 2018:DHC:2590

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking FIR registration in a civil tenancy dispute, holding that statutory remedies under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.

civil petition_dismissed Article 226 Constitution of India Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. writ petition FIR registration

Champa & Ors. v. Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd

19 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2593

The Delhi High Court held that labourers traveling as helpers on a garbage vehicle are entitled to compensation as non-gratuitous passengers and adjusted non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant motor accident claim gratuitous passenger helpers on duty compensation

Kaushalya Saini v. Management of Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar Adarsh Vidyalaya and Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2594

The Delhi High Court directed the managing society of a derecognized school to consider and decide the petitioner’s claim for salary arrears by passing a speaking order, enabling further legal recourse.

labor other salary arrears termination of service derecognition of school managing society liability

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. v. Lalu Kumar and Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2592

The Delhi High Court held the insurer liable despite the driver's fake license, reduced future prospects addition to 40%, and upheld 100% disability, modifying the compensation accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurer liability fake driving license disability assessment

Subhash Chaudhary v. Nirmala Devi & Ors.

19 Apr 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:2598
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the principal employer is liable to pay compensation under Section 12 of the Employees’ Compensation Act for fatal injuries to a casual worker during residential construction, and imposed penalty despite compensation payment.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Section 12 liability principal employer contractor liability

Shree Vinayak Iron Works v. Flowmore Limited

19 Apr 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:2599

The Delhi High Court dismissed a winding up petition as the debt claimed was bona fide disputed and the petition was being used as a pressure tactic to enforce payment.

corporate petition_dismissed Significant winding up petition Companies Act 1956 disputed debt rejection of goods

Vinod Kumar & Anr. v. Ajay Kumar Singhal

19 Apr 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:2600

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition against the setting aside of an eviction order, holding that review jurisdiction cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or seek rehearing absent an error apparent on the face of the record.

civil petition_dismissed Significant review petition error apparent on face of record Order 47 Rule 1 CPC bona fide requirement

Somnath Chugh v. Vinod Kumar Chugh & Anr

19 Apr 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:2596

The Delhi High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging eviction orders under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that bona fide requirement of the landlord was established and alternative accommodation was unsuitable.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alternative accommodation

Somnath Chugh v. Vinod Kumar Chugh

19 Apr 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:2595

The Delhi High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging eviction orders under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlords' bona fide need for the premises genuine and alternative accommodations unsuitable.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alternative accommodation

Sushila Devi @ Meera & Ors. v. Union of India

19 Apr 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:2597

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and directed the Railways to pay compensation to the family of a bona fide passenger who died after falling from a crowded train, affirming strict liability under the Railways Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act, 1989 compensation railway accident bona fide passenger

Shamsher Bahadur Nagpal LR's v. Sham Arora

19 Apr 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2584

The High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court’s rejection of specific performance, holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract as required under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance readiness and willingness Section 16(c) Specific Relief Act financial capacity

Kavya Pal Chaudhary v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

19 Apr 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:2583
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that admissions under the EWS category for the academic year 2017-18 cannot be granted after 31st December, dismissing the petition while directing unfilled seats to be carried forward to the next year.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Economically Weaker Section Right to Education Act, 2009 Delhi Right of Children to Free & Compulsory Education Rules, 2011 Admission cut-off date

Anshu Sachdeva v. The State NCT of Delhi

18 Apr 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:8184

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 406, 498-A, and 34 IPC following a settlement between parties, imposing conditions to ensure cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed anticipatory bail Section 406 IPC Section 498-A IPC Section 34 IPC

Chaman Singh & Ors. v. Land Acquisition Collector (East) & Ors.

18 Apr 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:2575-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a landowner whose Section 18 application under the Land Acquisition Act is rejected on grounds of delay is entitled to file a fresh reference under Section 28-A, quashing the dismissal of such an application by the Land Acquisition Collector.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18 Section 28-A reference application

IMV INDIA PVT LTD v. STRIDEWEL INTERNATIONAL

18 Apr 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:2557

The Delhi High Court held that no valid arbitration agreement existed based on a clause printed on the reverse of invoices referring disputes to a non-existent arbitration institution, and dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement consensus ad idem invoice terms and conditions incorporation of arbitration clause

IMV INDIA PVT LTD v. STRIDEWEL INTERNATIONAL

18 Apr 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:2565

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause printed unilaterally on the reverse of invoices without clear consent and reference does not constitute a valid arbitration agreement, and dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement consensus ad idem invoice arbitration clause Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act