Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Gulshan Kumar v. Shyam Lal Through LRs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's refusal of specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness, particularly financial capacity, under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
Sobha Applied DSP Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking injunction against fresh tender for GPS devices, holding that the determinable Service Agreement was not specifically enforceable and DTC, not party to the contract, could procure independently.
Kashish Aujla v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a Director accused under Sections 420 and 120B IPC, finding no prima facie involvement in the alleged fraud and considering prolonged custody.
Jasbir Singh Chawla v. CBI
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to summon the prosecution file after the sanctioning authority was cross-examined, holding that mere production of the file without proof does not assist in assessing the validity of sanction.
Nalanda Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial and revisional courts' rejection of the petitioners' claim to adjust an earlier payment against a clear settlement amount under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Nalanda Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial and revisional courts' rejection of the petitioners' claim to adjust an earlier payment against a subsequent settlement amount in Section 138 NI Act proceedings.
Nalanda Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a settlement under Section 138 NI Act, holding that prior payments not expressly included in the settlement cannot be adjusted against the agreed amount.
Nalanda Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial and revisional courts' rejection of the petitioner's claim that an earlier payment should be adjusted against a subsequent settlement amount in a Section 138 NI Act case.
Badal & Ors. v. M/s Niranjan Proptech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging the urbanization status and applicability of Section 33 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, holding that the appeal was rightly dismissed and the review petition was an abuse of process.
Travellers Exchange Corporation Limited & Ors. v. Celebrities Management Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's review petition challenging the disposal of interlocutory applications, holding that review cannot be used to re-agitate settled issues or substitute an appeal.
Manjula Saha & Anr. v. Maya Rani Saha Through Lrs
The Delhi High Court allowed the respondent to continue renting the disputed property under status quo, requiring periodic rent account filings, and dismissed the petitioners' restrictions on tenancy changes.
Ajit Ravi v. Delhi Jal Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging Delhi Jal Board's repair work order, directing authorities to expedite permissions and work, while leaving investigation and FIR matters to be pursued through proper legal channels.
Federation of All India Bhel Engineers and Officers Association v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to consider and decide the petitioner's Representation within a stipulated timeframe, disposing of the writ petition with liberty to supplement the Representation.
Sh. Umesh Kumar & Ors. v. Delhi State Health Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed compliance with a prior order and mandated a procedure for contractual employees to seek regularization through representation and a speaking order.
Sukhbeer Singh v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the employer to consider and pass a reasoned order on the petitioner's representation for promotion based on an SC/ST Cell recommendation, ensuring procedural fairness.
N K Wadhwa; A K Rajput v. Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Vigilance Commission and Disciplinary Authority to expedite clearance and decision on departmental proceedings against retired employees to facilitate timely release of retiral benefits.
Ashish Nischal and Arun Nischal v. Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisation
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Vigilance Commission and Disciplinary Authority to expedite decision-making on departmental inquiry reports against retired employees to avoid undue delay in release of retiral benefits.
Kuldeep Singh & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs under IPC Sections 323, 506, 509, and 354 based on a voluntary settlement arrived at through mediation, emphasizing the court's power to promote peace through alternative dispute resolution.
N K Wadhwa; A K Rajput v. Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the CVC and Disciplinary Authority to expedite clearance and decision on departmental proceedings against retired government employees to facilitate timely release of retiral benefits.
N K Wadhwa; A K Rajput v. Central Government Employees Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Vigilance Commission and Disciplinary Authority to expedite clearance and final orders in departmental proceedings against retired employees to facilitate timely release of retiral benefits.