Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

ANILNAGAR & ORS v. STATE & ORS; AMIT DHAWAN & ORS v. STATE & ORS

26 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva

The Delhi High Court quashed cross-FIRs arising from a neighborly dispute after the parties amicably settled their differences, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC cross-FIRs amicable settlement

Sanyam Suneja v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:9020

Delhi High Court stayed the disqualification of directors for non-filing of statutory returns, reactivated their DIN and DSC, and permitted compliance under the Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant disqualified directors non-filing of financial statements Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018 Director Identification Number

M/S Crystal Crop Protection Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India and Anr

26 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:9021

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw pending writ petitions with liberty to challenge the Appellate Authority's final order through fresh proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition withdrawal Appellate Authority final decision

ICICI Lombard General Ins. Co Ltd v. Jallan & Ors.

26 Apr 2018 · J. R. Midha · 2018:DHC:2779

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying future prospects and multiplier, upheld 50% contributory negligence, and disallowed loss of love and affection as a head of damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of dependency future prospects

Ashok Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Apr 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:2775-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penal rent deduction for unauthorized retention of government accommodation but allowed a fresh representation to be considered sympathetically.

administrative petition_dismissed penal rent government accommodation Central Industrial Security Force Article 226

Sanjay v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Apr 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:2772-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging land acquisition proceedings, holding that acceptance of compensation and admission of possession preclude claims of lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition actual physical possession Section 24(2) of 2013 Act compensation acceptance

Harish Kumar Bandhu v. Navyug School Educational Society

26 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2767

The Delhi High Court directed the respondent School to reconsider the petitioner's promotion eligibility to PGT (Hindi) in light of a government Circular and pass a reasoned order after hearing the petitioner’s representation.

administrative other Departmental Promotion Committee Post Graduate Teacher Recruitment Rules teaching experience

Neelam & Ors. v. Lt. Governor through Chief Secretary Delhi and Ors.

26 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2766

The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to consider and decide the petitioners' representation for regularization of Guest Teachers under the Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Bill, 2017, while maintaining status quo on their service.

administrative petition_allowed Guest Teachers Regularization Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan Bill, 2017 Representation

Virender Khanna & Associates v. Airport Authority of India

26 Apr 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:2765
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award for not refunding ₹26 lakhs wrongly encashed from the petitioner's bank guarantee and held interest must be awarded from the actual date of cause of action.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 bank guarantee performance guarantee interest

Ravinder v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

26 Apr 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2760-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the detention of a person without compliance with the Mental Health Act, 1987 and denial of legal representation violates fundamental rights under Article 21, setting aside illegal detention orders and directing immediate release.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Mental Health Act, 1987 Article 21 illegal detention habeas corpus

Kamla Sahoo v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

26 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2761

The Delhi High Court upheld anticipatory bail granted to an Army personnel, ruling that non-joining of mediation and complainant's refusal to receive dowry articles do not justify bail cancellation.

criminal petition_dismissed anticipatory bail breach of bail conditions mediation proceedings dowry articles

Mohd. Yasir v. State; State v. Mohd. Faizan

26 Apr 2018 · S. P. Garg; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:2756-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Mohd. Yasir for murder and robbery based on last seen evidence, recovery of stolen property, and forensic corroboration, while allowing the State's appeal against the acquittal of Mohd. Faizan.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant last seen theory murder robbery forensic evidence

Mohd. Yasir v. State; State v. Mohd. Faizan

26 Apr 2018 · S. P. Garg; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:2757-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld Mohd. Yasir's murder conviction and set aside Mohd. Faizan's acquittal based on last seen evidence, confession, forensic proof, and recovery of stolen property.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen evidence confession forensic evidence DNA fingerprinting

Indeen Bio Power Limited v. M/S. EFS Facilities Service (India) Pvt. Ltd.

26 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. · 2018:DHC:2758

The Delhi High Court held that an Arbitral Tribunal's order accepting lack of jurisdiction is appealable under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, and not challengeable only under Section 34.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 16 jurisdiction Section 37 appeal Section 34 setting aside award

Lal Mahal Limited v. Abdul Ghaffar Abdul Rehman

26 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:2759

The Delhi High Court held that a suit filed beyond the three-year limitation period for breach of contract is barred even after excluding arbitration time under Section 43(4) of the Arbitration Act, and Section 14 of the Limitation Act does not apply to arbitration proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 14 Limitation Act Section 43 Arbitration Act

Gopal Dutt v. State (NCT of Delhi)

26 Apr 2018 · S. Muralidhar; I.S. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2762-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murdering his wife based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and proper framing of an alternative charge under Section 302 IPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC alternative charge Section 313 CrPC

S C SOOD v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

26 Apr 2018 · S.P. Garg · 2018:DHC:2764

The Delhi High Court held that a Lok Adalat settlement does not extinguish criminal liability under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act unless payments are made, and an appellate court must decide the appeal on merits if settlement terms are not honored.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Lok Adalat settlement compounding of offence appeal dismissal

Rameez @ Ramish Ahmed v. The State NCT of Delhi

26 Apr 2018 · S.P. Garg; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:2763-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's rape conviction based on credible child testimony and forensic evidence but set aside the SC/ST Act conviction for lack of caste-based motive, modifying the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape child victim testimony SC/ST Act Section 3(2)(v)

Ashok Bajaj v. Lalit Bajaj & Anr.

26 Apr 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:2770

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff with valid title is entitled to recover possession from defendants occupying as licensees, awarding possession, injunctions, and mesne profits while rejecting defendants' limitation and family settlement defenses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant recovery of possession licensee mesne profits limitation

Hemant Dandona v. Naveen Bareja

25 Apr 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:634

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside dismissal of cheque bounce complaints for non-prosecution, holding that sufficient cause including inadvertence of counsel and death of complainant justified restoration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 256 CrPC non-prosecution non-appearance