Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Sardar Rai @ Brajesh Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

01 May 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:2810

The Delhi High Court held that after chargesheet filing, the accused must seek regular bail from the trial court, and interim protection granted during anticipatory bail proceedings continues only until such application is decided.

criminal appeal_dismissed anticipatory bail interim protection regular bail chargesheet

Vijay Kumar v. Seema Gupta

01 May 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:2821

The Delhi High Court granted leave to contest and set aside eviction orders where tenants raised triable issues of bona fide need and suppression of facts by the landlord under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 25-B bona fide need

Rajesh Kumar Dixit v. Somdutt Sharma

01 May 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:2819

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree passed on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for recovery of Rs.4,85,000 with interest, holding that clear admissions in pleadings and documents are binding and cannot be withdrawn by the Defendant.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC judgment on admissions loan agreement mortgage deed

Meadow Infradevelopers Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer

01 May 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:2818-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the reopening of income tax assessment under Section 148, holding that reopening is impermissible without fresh material when the Assessing Officer had already considered the relevant documents during the original assessment.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act reopening of assessment change of opinion fresh and new material

Sanghamitra Mohanty v. HSCC (India) Limited and Anr.

01 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2815

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a contractual employee’s representation for absorption with a reasoned order, restraining replacement of contractual employees without due process.

administrative other Significant contractual employment absorption speaking order arbitrariness

Ram Karan v. Union of India & Anr

01 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2814

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of a compassionate appointment claim supported by RTI information despite a ban on filling outsourced Group D posts, emphasizing reasoned decisions by authorities.

administrative other compassionate appointment daily wages Group D posts outsourced posts

Uma Mitra v. Shyama Prasad Vidyalaya Managing Committee and Ors

01 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2816

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to challenge adverse ACR gradings affecting her financial upgradation under ACP and MACP Schemes and directed reconsideration upon revision of ACRs.

service_law other Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Annual Confidential Reports financial upgradation

Azad Devi & Ors. v. School Management of Ring Midways Senior Secondary Public School & Anr

01 May 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2817

The Delhi High Court held that reinstated employees are entitled to back-wages unless gainful employment elsewhere is proved, and directed the School to reconsider their Representation without denying relief on procedural grounds.

labor appeal_allowed Significant back-wages reinstatement Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Managing Committee

Rhiti Sports Management Pvt. Ltd. v. Power Play Sports & Events Ltd.

01 May 2018 · Vibhu Bakhrur · 2018:DHC:2808
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal's procedural order rejecting production of additional documents is not an arbitral award and thus not challengeable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral award Interim award Procedural order Section 34 Arbitration Act

Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra v. Brahmaputra Capital & Financial Services Ltd.

01 May 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:2805-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that interest income on advances classified as NPAs under RBI prudential norms does not accrue for tax purposes and is not taxable as real income under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Non-Banking Financial Company RBI Prudential Norms Non-Performing Assets Interest Income

Kiran Lohia v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors

01 May 2018 · Vipin Sanghi; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:2806-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a writ of habeas corpus is maintainable for interim custody of a minor child under five years, ordinarily favoring the mother under Section 6(a) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, and directed continuation of interim custody with the mother pending final custody determination by the Family Court.

family petition_allowed Significant writ of habeas corpus custody of minor child Section 6(a) Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act interim custody

Laxmi Narayan Soni v. Sudha Gupta & Ors.

01 May 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2807

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in a possession suit holding it barred by limitation and for failure to prove the identity of the suit property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation cause of action possession suit Order IX Rule 9 CPC

Gagnish Arora v. Union of India

27 Apr 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:2795-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the wrongful disqualification of a director due to the company’s failure to file his resignation with the Registrar of Companies, emphasizing that valid resignation precludes disqualification under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant director resignation Section 164(2)(a) Companies Act 2013 disqualification of directors Form 32 filing

Manjeet v. State of NCT of Delhi

27 Apr 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:9090

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging ongoing investigations under Section 420 IPC, allowing withdrawal with liberty to seek remedies before the trial court.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 420 IPC Cheating Investigation Withdrawal of petition

The Kangra Co Operative Bank Ltd v. Seema Sharma

27 Apr 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:2803-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a Presenting Officer cannot be the sole witness to prove a domestic enquiry report before an Industrial Adjudicator as it violates natural justice, dismissing the management's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Presenting Officer domestic enquiry principles of natural justice bias

Indrajeetsingh v. Union of India & Anr

27 Apr 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:9014-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging a Railway Protection Force selection process due to gross delay and laches, declining to exercise writ jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed delay and laches writ petition Article 226 selection process

JAI RASH ARORA v. STATE

27 Apr 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8453

The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs arising from a neighborly dispute based on an amicable settlement to restore peace and harmony, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC restoration of peace

Dr. Vikas Kumar Teotia & Ors. v. The Director, Central Council for Research in Yoga and Naturopathy & Ors.

27 Apr 2018 · Sunil Gaur · 2018:DHC:2784

The Delhi High Court refused to quash the administrative communication but postponed the scheduled examination and directed modification of the test pattern to ensure fairness.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition examination postponement administrative communication test pattern modification

Darshan Singh (Deceased) Thr Lrs. v. Bhagya Wanti & Ors.

27 Apr 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:2789

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered Will executed by the deceased, dismissing the partition suit filed by his legal heirs claiming intestate succession.

civil appeal_dismissed registered Will partition suit intestate succession attesting witnesses

Amit Saxena v. State and Ors.

27 Apr 2018 · Manmohan · 2018:DHC:2791

The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the petitioner after the executor renounced executorship, confirming the validity of the Will and compliance with procedural requirements under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

civil petition_allowed Indian Succession Act, 1925 probate Letters of Administration executor renunciation