Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Dr. Prannoy Roy v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax
The Delhi High Court held that ITAT orders for early hearing require formal judicial orders and additional documents cannot be admitted without proper application under Rule 29, setting aside the impugned order and directing compliance with procedural safeguards.
Dr. Prannoy Roy v. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax
The Delhi High Court held that ITAT orders for early hearing are judicial and require formal pronouncement, and additional documents must be admitted only following proper procedure under Rule 29, setting aside the impugned order for non-compliance.
Suraj @ Bhagat v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner two weeks' parole to attend a family marriage on humanitarian grounds subject to furnishing bond and surety.
Surender v. The State NCT of Delhi
The High Court held that an accused cannot be penalized for non-service of summons on prosecution witnesses beyond his control and directed the Trial Court to issue fresh process to secure their presence.
Rajbir Singh v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act for failing to disclose essential ingredients of the offence, holding the FIR to be mala fide and a counterblast to the petitioner's action against unauthorized construction.
India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd v. Rajiv Kumar Saxena
The Delhi High Court dismissed ITDC's delayed challenge to an arbitral award upholding compensation for furniture stored due to ITDC's failure to accept delivery, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation periods under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Richa Shailja v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal must pass reasoned orders and remanded the petitioner's transfer stay application for fresh hearing with reasons.
Rajesh Kumar Singh v. Arshay & Ors (Tata AIG Insurance Co Ltd)
The Delhi High Court directed release of a settled motor accident claim amount to the petitioner’s wife upon obtaining NOCs from other legal heirs.
Shalini Sharma v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed non-speaking orders denying pay protection to a petitioner and directed the University to reconsider her representation with a reasoned order, emphasizing the need for parity and proper administrative reasoning.
Ashok Kumar Maheshwari v. Director of Education
The Delhi High Court directed the fourth respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass a speaking order within four weeks, ensuring compliance with an earlier direction and enabling the petitioner to seek further remedies.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Golu Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, upholding the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award of compensation for injuries caused by the bus driver’s negligence.
Kulranjan Toppo; Sunil Dwivedi v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an Office Order clarifying eligibility for Executive Car Facility cannot be applied retrospectively to deny benefits already granted or legitimately claimed by employees holding DGM posts.
Kulranjan Toppo; Sunil Dwivedi v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an Office Order clarifying entitlement to Executive Car Facility cannot be applied retrospectively to deny benefits already granted or claimed before its issuance, directing the respondent to provide the facility to the petitioners.
Shyam Kunvar v. C.L. Bhalla D.A.V. Senior Secondary School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent school to treat the petitioner’s Legal Notice as a representation and pass a speaking order within six weeks, ensuring compliance with the Directorate of Education’s directions.
Santosh Kumar v. State Bank of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary findings against a bank officer but directed reconsideration of the proportionality of dismissal penalty under service rules.
Raj Singh v. District and Sessions Judge (HQS)
The Delhi High Court directed the authority to reconsider the petitioner's seniority fixation claim by passing a speaking order after allowing a fresh representation, as the earlier order failed to address the parity issue.
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India v. Idea Cellular Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal's interim order staying certain provisions of the 2018 Telecommunication Tariff Order, emphasizing the need to balance regulatory transparency with protection of sensitive commercial information.
M/S 2 BANDITS RESTAURANT v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed immediate de-sealing of the petitioner's premises in compliance with the Financial Commissioner's stay order against the Excise Commissioner's sealing order.
SHUBH MARKETING PVT. LTD. & ORS v. STATE & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from a commercial dispute on the basis of a valid settlement between the parties and consent of the complainant.
Abhishek Verma & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes amicably and filed for divorce by mutual consent.