Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Himanshu Kumar v. Pragati Power Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the employer to provide a reasoned response on the petitioner’s lien and resignation withdrawal requests, ensuring procedural fairness without deciding the substantive issue.
Kaanchan Azad v. National Commission for Scheduled Caste & Scheduled Tribe
The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission's recommendation against de-reservation of a reserved promotion post is not binding, directing the Government to consider the petitioner's representation afresh in light of Supreme Court precedent and DoPT guidelines.
Amit Yadav v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Director of Education to consider and respond to the petitioner’s Representation within a specified time, ensuring administrative accountability.
Sundar Lal; Fateh Singh Sanwariya v. Central Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that employees compulsorily retired are entitled to leave encashment benefits with interest on arrears limited to three years prior to the petition date.
Sundar Lal; Fateh Singh Sanwariya v. Central Bank of India
The Delhi High Court held that compulsorily retired employees are entitled to leave encashment benefits with interest payable for three years prior to petition filing, directing the bank to comply accordingly.
Krishan v. Manager Canara Bank and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the disciplinary punishment imposed on a bank employee for assault, holding that the punishment was justified and proportionate given the petitioner’s admission of the incident.
Devendra Prasad Chandola v. Directorate of Education and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Education to provide a personal hearing and a reasoned response to the petitioner's fresh representation within a stipulated timeframe, ensuring procedural fairness.
Latif @ Dallu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murdering his wife by smothering, relying on corroborated child witness, medical, and forensic evidence.
Manoj v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of two accused for the rape of a minor, emphasizing that minor contradictions in the victim's testimony do not vitiate the prosecution case when supported by medical and DNA evidence, while modifying the sentence of one accused under Section 376(2)(g) IPC.
D.T.C. v. Rumal Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed DTC's writ petition and upheld the Labour Court's order directing payment of full back wages to the employee for the period between the award and reinstatement, emphasizing the binding nature of unchallenged awards and prohibiting employers from withholding dues due to delay.
Aamir v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellant Aamir for robbery with use of a weapon under Sections 392 and 397 IPC, while releasing appellant Fahad on the period already undergone, finding the prosecution evidence credible despite minor contradictions and procedural gaps.
Aamir v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Aamir for armed robbery under Sections 392/397 IPC and released Fahad on the period already undergone, affirming that immediate recovery and credible witness testimony suffice despite minor contradictions.
IBI Group UK Ltd. and IBI Group (Consortium) and Anr. v. National Highways Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions filed by IBI Group UK Ltd. and others against the National Highways Authority of India without order as to costs.
EFKON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED AND STRABAG AG CONSORTIUM v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld NHAI's technical disqualification of bidders in a public tender for toll management systems, emphasizing limited judicial interference absent arbitrariness or mala fide.
Raymond Ltd. v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court struck down a tender condition requiring prior supply of school uniform fabric as arbitrary and discriminatory, allowing new entrants to participate fairly in the bidding process.
S.E. Investments Ltd v. Jay Polychem (India) Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's finding that ₹5 crores was loan repayment, not cash collateral, but set aside the reduced pendente lite interest rate, holding the contractual interest rate must apply.
Jay Polychem (India) Ltd v. S.E. Investment Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award for being barred by limitation and upheld the award on merits, refusing to condone delay in refiling under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Baljeet Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court altered the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part II IPC and reduced the sentence from life imprisonment to eight years' rigorous imprisonment based on the nature of a solitary injury and relevant precedent.
Kulamani Biswal v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to expeditiously consider and decide the petitioner's representations against suspension imposed during a CBI investigation for illegal gratification.
Manoj Kumar v. Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU)
The Delhi High Court directed IGNOU to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representations within a specified timeframe, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.