Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Vinod Kumar & Anr. v. Asha Devi & Ors.

08 May 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:3014

The Delhi High Court issued a corrigendum correcting the description of a party and upheld the recorded date of death in a partition suit judgment without altering substantive findings.

civil other Procedural corrigendum partition suit clerical error correction verbatim testimony extract

Mahesh Chandra Sharma v. Tycoon Seeds Pvt. Ltd.

08 May 2018 · Jayant Nath · 2018:DHC:2951

The High Court dismissed the appeal against the Company Law Board's order rejecting a company petition as barred by res judicata and because the company was defunct and not carrying on business.

corporate appeal_dismissed Companies Act, 1956 Section 397 Section 398 Section 10(F)

Surjeetbhalla v. State NCT of Delhi

08 May 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:9094

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC after charge sheet filing placed the petitioners in column No. 12, holding that no quashing remedy survives at this stage.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 34 IPC

Nokia Solutions and Networks India Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.

08 May 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:9025-DB

The Delhi High Court confirmed an interim stay on tax recovery pending appeal before the CIT(A) and disposed of writ petitions without adjudicating merits, urging expeditious disposal of appeals.

tax appeal_allowed interim stay tax demand Income Tax Act, 1961 appeal before CIT(A)

Syed Afshan Rehman & Anr v. Jawed Zia

08 May 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8594

The High Court dismissed revision petitions challenging an interim order refusing summons for documents as infructuous since the interim order merged with the Family Court's final order.

family petition_dismissed Family Court summoning documents interim order final order

Deepak Goyal & Ors v. State, NCT of Delhi & Anr

08 May 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8465

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs under Sections 308/34 and 323/325/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be futile.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR settlement cross FIRs Section 308 IPC

Rajinder Singh @ Ladi & Ors v. State (NCT) of Delhi & Anr

08 May 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:8460

The Delhi High Court quashed multiple FIRs arising from disputes over cremation ground management following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC settlement between parties criminal proceedings

Rinku @ Rajwant Singh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

08 May 2018 · Anu Malhotra · 2018:DHC:8388

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 341, 427, 506, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the complainant and accused, with no opposition from the State.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC settlement Indian Penal Code Sections 308, 341, 427, 506, 34

Praveen Kumar Sharma v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors

08 May 2018 · A. K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8387

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 467, 468, 471, and 120-B IPC based on an amicable compromise accepted by the complainant's legal heirs.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise deed property fraud legal heirs

Bunti v. Gaurav Goswarni and Priti Goswami

08 May 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:8211

The Delhi High Court granted bail to petitioners not directly implicated in forcible sexual intercourse after prolonged custody, imposing conditions to ensure trial attendance.

criminal bail_granted bail sexual offence forcible sexual intercourse prosecutrix statement

State v. Bittu Mandal

08 May 2018 · Vipin Sanghi; P. S. Teji · 2018:DHC:3036-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused for rape of a minor, holding that the victim's credible testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence and school records sufficiently proved the offence and the victim's age.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape victim testimony proof of age school records

Union of India v. R.K. Jain

08 May 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:3035

The Delhi High Court held that the Central Information Commission does not have jurisdiction under the RTI Act, 2005 to recommend disciplinary action against the First Appellate Authority, limiting such powers to the Central Public Information Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Central Information Commission First Appellate Authority Central Public Information Officer

Abdul Gaffur @ Abd. Gafur & Anr. v. Sachit Bhagat

08 May 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3033

The Delhi High Court held that for jurisdiction under the Employee's Compensation Act, the employer's place of business or residence can be treated as the registered office when no formal registered office exists, allowing the compensation claim to proceed in Delhi.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 jurisdiction registered office place of business

M/S Durga Cable Network v. Sunita

08 May 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:3032

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation and penalty awarded against M/s Durga Cable Network for the death of an employee sustained during the course of employment, dismissing the employer's appeal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees Compensation Act employer-employee relationship compensation for death workplace injury

Himani Malhotra v. The Indraprastha College for Women & Anr

08 May 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Deepa Sharma · 2018:DHC:3031-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's challenge to disciplinary proceedings, holding that prior waiver of the right to challenge precludes belated objections and dilatory tactics.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary enquiry waiver delay tactics recusal

Harun Sheikh v. State & Anr.

08 May 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:3034

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR for offences under Sections 224, 225, and 34 IPC, holding that fleeing from custody constitutes an offence and the Magistrate had jurisdiction to order arrest and interrogation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Sections 224, 225, 34 IPC arrest and custody Magistrate jurisdiction

SPORTZ & LIVE ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED v. VOLLEYBALL FEDERATION OF INDIA

08 May 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3027

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, holding that disputed authority and internal governance issues preclude interim relief for exclusive rights to conduct volleyball leagues.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act interim injunction exclusive rights authority to contract

M/S AGYA HOLDING PVT. LTD v. JONES LANG LASALLE PROPERTY

08 May 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3028

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing the petitioner’s fee refund claim on res judicata grounds, affirming the Company Law Board’s jurisdiction and rejecting the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant res judicata arbitration agreement Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Radical Builders v. Pharmaceutical Employees Corporation

08 May 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:3029

The Delhi High Court upheld the Supplementary Award rejecting escalation claims, affirming that courts cannot re-appreciate evidence under the Arbitration Act and that subsequent agreements override prior communications.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration Act, 1940 Supplementary Award Escalation Charges Price Variation

Amrik Singh v. Braham Prakash Yadav

08 May 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3026

The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant's revision petition, set aside the eviction order, and granted leave to contest based on the availability of suitable alternative commercial accommodation concealed by the landlord.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 25B eviction