Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

St Marks Sr Sec Public School v. Director of Education

11 May 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:3126-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Directorate of Education's order disallowing a tuition fee hike for air conditioning running costs, directing recovery under annual charges and mandating proper maintenance of depreciation funds for development fees.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant tuition fee development fee Delhi School Education Act, 1973 Duggal Committee report

Lt. Colonel Vineet Mehta v. The Estate Officer & Ors.

11 May 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:3125-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of an Army officer from public premises, affirming the absolute right of the owner to terminate allotment and limiting judicial review where statutory remedies exist.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Public Premises Act Eviction Unauthorized Occupant Lease Termination

Anshul Aggarwal v. Union of India & Ors.

11 May 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:3124-DB

The Delhi High Court examined the constitutional validity of MCI amendments disqualifying open school candidates and imposing upper age limits for NEET, emphasizing the need for reasonable restrictions under Article 19(6) and applying the doctrine of proportionality.

constitutional other Significant Medical Council of India Regulations NEET eligibility Open School Boards Article 19(1)(g)

Indu Singh and Anr. v. Prem Chaudhary and Ors.

11 May 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Valmiki J. Mehta; R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3119-DB

The Delhi High Court Full Bench held that an order for sale in a partition suit is a final decree and an instrument of partition under the Stamp Act, attracting stamp duty and being immediately executable.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit final decree preliminary decree order for sale

IRB Ahmedabad Vadodara Super Express Toll Ways Pvt Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India

11 May 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:3120-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award and held that the concessionaire is contractually obliged to grant discounts and concessions on both NH-8 and the Ahmedabad-Vadodara Expressway under the Concession Agreement and National Highways Fee Rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Concession Agreement National Highways Fee Rules 2008 Expressway NH-8

Kamal Jeet v. Sneh Lata Chaturvedi

11 May 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3121
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture of earnest money under an agreement to sell immovable property must be reasonable and supported by proof of loss, and ordered refund of the amount paid with interest after dismissal of specific performance suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant agreement to sell earnest money forfeiture specific performance

M/s UNITED ELECTRONICS & ANR. v. M/s COMPUAGE INFOCOM LTD. & ANR.

11 May 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3123

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in an Order XXXVII CPC suit, holding that an unsubstantiated defence of defective goods without rejection notice under Section 42 Sale of Goods Act does not constitute a triable issue warranting leave to defend.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend substantial defence frivolous defence

Parveen Garg v. Satpal Singh & Anr.

11 May 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:3122

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking specific performance of a property sale agreement due to lack of privity with the actual owner and failure to prove continuous readiness and willingness with substantial payment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance privity of contract readiness and willingness financial capacity

Eros Resorts & Hotels Ltd v. Explorer Associates Pvt Ltd & Anr

11 May 2018 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; A.K. CHAWLA · 2018:DHC:3118-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the order rejecting the application to reject the plaint against the appellant, holding no cause of action was disclosed against it due to lack of privity of contract and that the appeal was maintainable as the suit was instituted before the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil appeal_allowed Significant cause of action privity of contract Order VII Rule 11 CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015

MS. Pooja Khatri & Ors. v. Delhi University & Ors.

11 May 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:3116

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the practical examination results of a Physical Education degree, holding that the examiners acted within their discretion and the petitioners' claims were belated and without merit.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant practical examination external examiner academic evaluation judicial review

Vikas Bhaskar v. University of Delhi and Anr.

11 May 2018 · Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:3117

The Delhi High Court held that the University of Delhi cannot retrospectively apply amended supplementary examination rules to students admitted before 2017-18, protecting their legitimate expectation and directing the University to allow supplementary exams as per the earlier scheme.

administrative petition_allowed Significant retrospective application legitimate expectation supplementary examination academic policy

The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Delhi (N) v. M/s Kangan Security Service (Regd)

11 May 2018 · Siddharth Mridul; Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:3153-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the reduction of provident fund damages to 60% considering mitigating circumstances of delayed cheque encashment, emphasizing correct application of Sections 14-B and 7Q of the EPF Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Employees Provident Fund Act Section 14-B Section 7Q damages

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SEEMA DEVI & ORS

11 May 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:3151

Delhi High Court recalculated and enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying Supreme Court guidelines on dependency loss and non-pecuniary damages, allowing the insurance company's appeal in part.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency personal and living expenses deduction non-pecuniary damages

Ram Shankar & Anr v. Binod Kumar Rai & Ors

11 May 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:3150

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by applying Delhi minimum wages, adding future prospects, and increasing the multiplier as per Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement loss of dependency future prospects

PVR INOX LTD. v. SHEETAL ANSAL & ORS.

11 May 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5637

The Delhi High Court referred disputes between the petitioner and respondents 1 and 3 to arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, leaving the inclusion of respondent 2 to the arbitrator's determination.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Section 12(2)

Mahipal v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

10 May 2018 · A.K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8212

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioners in a dowry case, subject to furnishing personal bonds and sureties, considering disputed facts about the return of dowry articles.

criminal bail_granted bail dowry return of dowry articles personal bond

Kharbanda and Lalita v. State

10 May 2018 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:8172

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Gurudwara office bearers accused of misappropriation, considering partial accounting of funds, delay in complaint, and ongoing civil disputes.

criminal bail_granted Significant anticipatory bail misappropriation Gurudwara funds office bearers

Bholanath Lal v. M/S. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd.

10 May 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3111

The Delhi High Court held that illegally terminated workmen are entitled to reinstatement with full back wages unless the employer proves gainful employment, setting aside an award granting only 10% back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant illegal termination back wages reinstatement industrial dispute

Bholanath Lal v. M/S. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd.

10 May 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3112

The Delhi High Court held that employees illegally terminated are entitled to full back wages unless the employer proves gainful employment, setting aside a Labour Court award granting only 10% back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant illegal termination back wages reinstatement burden of proof

Bholanath Lal v. M/S. Shree Om Enterprises (P) Ltd.

10 May 2018 · Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:3110

The Delhi High Court held that illegally terminated workmen are entitled to reinstatement with full back wages unless the employer proves gainful employment, setting aside a Labour Court award that granted only partial back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant illegal termination back wages reinstatement burden of proof