Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
UMESH GARG v. UNION BANK OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement of a bank employee for connivance in fraud but directed reconsideration of recovery from retiral benefits after hearing the employee.
Lalwati & Ors. v. D D A
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging possession orders by the DDA, holding that the petition was barred by delay and an alternative remedy under the Public Premises Act existed.
FCI Handling Workers Union v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging a departmental request letter for de-notification of FCI depots, holding that such a letter is not a justiciable order and the petition was premature.
Satinder Kumar v. New India Assurance Company Ltd.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking appointment on compassionate grounds by directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation and the respondent to decide it within a stipulated timeframe.
Anil Srivastava v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner's representation regarding pay allowances in accordance with applicable rules, ensuring procedural fairness and enabling further legal recourse.
Anita Soharu Guleria v. Director of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to exhaust administrative remedies by submitting representations for service benefits and mandated speaking orders and personal hearings before judicial intervention.
Anita Soharu Guleria v. Director of Education & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed petitioners to exhaust administrative remedies through representations and granted them the right to personal hearings before adjudicating their claims for service benefits.
Sanjeev Mahajan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that Members of Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions are not entitled to allowances and perquisites in 'Last Pay Drawn' for pension calculation under existing rules, dismissing their petitions without challenge to the relevant rule.
Prof. Dr. Md. Ishtiaque v. Jamia Millia Islamia
The Delhi High Court directed the university to consider the petitioner's fresh representation regarding damage charges for retention of accommodation during deputation and pass a reasoned order within a stipulated time.
R N Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners one final opportunity to produce a handwriting expert witness despite prior closure of defence evidence, subject to costs, to ensure fair trial and expeditious disposal.
R N Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners one final opportunity to produce a handwriting expert witness in their defence, subject to costs, emphasizing procedural fairness and expeditious trial.
R N Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners one final opportunity to examine a handwriting expert in their criminal trial, balancing procedural finality with the right to a fair defence.
R N Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners one final opportunity to examine a handwriting expert witness in their defence, subject to costs and fixed timelines, ensuring fair trial rights while maintaining procedural discipline.
R N Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners a final opportunity to produce a handwriting expert witness despite prior closure of defence evidence, subject to costs and strict timelines.
R N Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners one final opportunity to produce a handwriting expert witness in their defence, subject to costs and fixed timelines, ensuring a fair yet expeditious trial.
R N Gupta Technical Educational Society v. Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioners one final opportunity to produce a handwriting expert witness in their defence, subject to costs and strict timelines, ensuring fair trial and expedition.
Mahender Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 304B and 498A IPC due to lack of direct evidence of dowry demand and pending examination of witnesses.
Raju Chaudhary v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under Sections 354A and 370 IPC and child protection laws, observing that the petitioner’s limited role and prosecutrix’s non-cooperation justified bail with protective conditions.
Devender Tyagi v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail with conditions in a rape case pending trial court cognizance, directing the petitioner to seek regular bail thereafter.
St Marks Sr Sec Public School v. Director of Education
Delhi High Court held that schools cannot recover capital-related costs through tuition fees and must maintain separate accounts for development fees, directing fresh inspection to determine permissible annual charges for air conditioning plant running costs.