Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
DELH TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. RAKESH KUMAR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's decision setting aside punishment imposed on a workman due to the management's failure to reserve the right to lead fresh evidence after the domestic enquiry was found vitiated.
National Highways Authority of India v. Patel – KNR (JV)
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting compensation to the contractor for delay in site possession, idling charges, overheads, escalation, and interest, dismissing NHAI's challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Pankaj Bhadana v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition and upheld the conviction of the petitioner for rash and negligent driving causing death based on credible eyewitness police testimony and concurrent findings of the courts below.
The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Sujeet Rajak @ Vishal
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused from kidnapping charges where the minor prosecutrix voluntarily accompanied him and they had married and lived together.
Sunil Kumar Gupta v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition after the government amended prison guidelines to remove gender-based discrimination against women prisoners in eligibility for semi-open and open jails.
Gaurav Kumar Bansal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the tribunal chairperson selection process following the Supreme Court's directive to continue the process without entertaining litigation.
Pravin Singh Chauhan v. Delhi Transco Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a notice invoking arbitration need not be addressed to the specifically named authority and that failure to appoint an arbitrator within the prescribed time results in forfeiture of the right, entitling the petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act.
Pushpa Devi v. Sushila
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 NI Act due to lack of credible evidence and discrepancies in the prosecution’s case.
Kamla & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Railways are strictly liable to pay compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased bona fide passenger in a railway accident even if the train ticket is not recovered, reversing the Tribunal's rejection of the claim.
Suresh Kumar Sharma v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner one opportunity to cross-examine a prosecution witness under Section 311 Cr.P.C., recognizing the accused's lack of representation when the right was initially closed.
Shashi v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a disputed FIR alleged to be a counterblast, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and non-prejudice to prosecution.
Sandeep Kumar v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of rape and causing miscarriage, noting the complainant's no objection and the petitioner's cooperation with the investigation.
Mohammad Asif v. State
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving assault allegations, relying on CCTV evidence and the petitioner’s cooperation with the investigation.
Tayyab Ali v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving alleged assault, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and imposing conditions to safeguard the prosecution.
Kuldeep Sharma & Ors. v. Surinder Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in a partition suit holding that the issue of prior partition was conclusively decided in an earlier suit and barred by res judicata.
IDOL SH CHHOTTE HANUMANJI MAHARAJ & ANR. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the suit for possession was barred by limitation and the Government validly resumed possession due to misuse of the allotted land.
Rajbir Singh & Anr. v. Jaswant Yavdav
The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture of earnest money under an agreement to sell is governed by Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, allowing only reasonable compensation and requiring proof of loss when the earnest money is substantial, thereby restricting the seller's right to forfeit the entire amount without such proof.
The Procter & Gamble Company v. Midas Healthcare Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and ex parte decree in favor of Procter & Gamble against defendants for infringement and passing off of the well-known trademark 'P&G'.
Rajesh Ohri v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed registered Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, in favor of the petitioner executor after no objections were raised by legal heirs.
Vinod Kumar v. Kay International Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a commercial recovery suit for non-production of documents, permitting filing of additional evidence and directing a fresh expeditious trial with security and procedural safeguards.